Making a Case for Religious Freedom: The Church of Scientology Responds to Claims Made in an Unauthorized Biography of Tom Cruise

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION Journal of Media and Religion Pub Date : 2017-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15348423.2017.1311121
Jessalynn R. Strauss
{"title":"Making a Case for Religious Freedom: The Church of Scientology Responds to Claims Made in an Unauthorized Biography of Tom Cruise","authors":"Jessalynn R. Strauss","doi":"10.1080/15348423.2017.1311121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines a 14-page statement released by the Church of Scientology in response to author Andrew Morton’s unauthorized biography of Tom Cruise, one of Scientology’s most notable celebrity adherents. Placing this situation within the larger context of media coverage of new religious movements, the study uses a modified version of Burke’s (1973) “cluster-agon” analysis to show how the Scientology statement attempts to define the church’s legitimacy in opposition to what they portray as baseless character defamation by a journalist of questionable credibility. Analysis of the statement also reveals an interesting attempt by the Church of Scientology to access shared cultural symbols by portraying itself as a persecuted religion seeking sanctuary in the American tradition of religious freedom.","PeriodicalId":55954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media and Religion","volume":"21 1","pages":"39 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2017.1311121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines a 14-page statement released by the Church of Scientology in response to author Andrew Morton’s unauthorized biography of Tom Cruise, one of Scientology’s most notable celebrity adherents. Placing this situation within the larger context of media coverage of new religious movements, the study uses a modified version of Burke’s (1973) “cluster-agon” analysis to show how the Scientology statement attempts to define the church’s legitimacy in opposition to what they portray as baseless character defamation by a journalist of questionable credibility. Analysis of the statement also reveals an interesting attempt by the Church of Scientology to access shared cultural symbols by portraying itself as a persecuted religion seeking sanctuary in the American tradition of religious freedom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为宗教自由辩护:山达基教会回应一本未经授权的汤姆克鲁斯传记中的言论
山达基教会发表了一份长达14页的声明,以回应作者安德鲁·莫顿未经授权的汤姆·克鲁斯传记,汤姆·克鲁斯是山达基最著名的名人信徒之一。将这种情况置于媒体报道新兴宗教运动的更大背景下,该研究使用了伯克(1973)“集群-agon”分析的修改版本,以显示山达基的声明如何试图定义教会的合法性,以反对他们所描述的毫无根据的人格诽谤,这些诽谤是由一个可信度可疑的记者进行的。对该声明的分析也揭示了山达基教会的一个有趣的尝试,它将自己描绘成一个受迫害的宗教,在美国的宗教自由传统中寻求庇护,从而获得共同的文化符号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Still Fighting the God-Vs.-Gays Battle: Twitter Reaction to Presidential Candidate Pete Buttigieg’s Identification as a Gay Member of the Christian Left Tweeting for Religion: How Indonesian Islamic Fundamentalist Organizations Use Twitter Differences in Religious Framing of Muslims and Islam in American Media Coverage Before and After the Trump Campaign Faith Discourses in the Context of Racial Tension: Black Lives Matter and Its Counter-Narratives Digital Merit: A Case Study of a Chinese Buddhist Meditation Group on WeChat During the Early Outbreak of Covid-19 in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1