Effect of dynamic muscular stabilization training over conventional exercise program on mechanical low back pain in office workers to improve the quality of life: A randomized controlled study

M. Mulye, Rashmi S Yeradkar
{"title":"Effect of dynamic muscular stabilization training over conventional exercise program on mechanical low back pain in office workers to improve the quality of life: A randomized controlled study","authors":"M. Mulye, Rashmi S Yeradkar","doi":"10.4103/ijoth.ijoth_23_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Most jobs nowadays are sedentary in nature. Due to incorrect posture, strain on the spine, pelvis, muscles, tendons, joints, bones, and discs can lead to fatigue and deformation. Low back pain (LBP) is the most common one among all pains. It has a profound impact on the quality of life (QoL). Core training has emerged as a major trend in LBP management and prevention. In Dynamic Muscular Stabilization Training (DMST), adequate dynamic control of lumbar spine forces is achieved, which reduces the repetitive injury to the structures of the spinal segments and related tissues. Thus, the aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of DMST on LBP in office workers. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of DMST in mechanical LBP to improve the QoL in office workers. Study Design: Prospective, experimental, randomized controlled, comparative study design was chosen for the research. Methods: One hundred and twenty-four office workers (male and female, aged 30-50 years) were screened on Cornell musculoskeletal discomfort questionnaire (CMDQ). Fifty office workers were selected after screening, those who met the inclusion criteria (mechanical LBP and CMDQ for lower back more than 1.5). Office workers were equally divided into two groups, namely study group which received DMST and control group which received conventional exercises. Follow-up assessments were conducted at the baseline, 4th week, and 8th week on Oswestry LBP disability questionnaire (OLBPDQ) and World Health Organization QoL-BREF. Results: Both the study (n = 25) and control (n = 25) groups equally improved with their respective intervention. In the study group, LBP reduced more (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.636-14.764) postintervention. Whereas, a significant improvement in physical (P < 0.001, 95% CI: 86.099-91.301) and psychological (P < 0.001, 95% CI: 60.725-69.475) domains of QoL was found in the study group compared to the control group. The correlation between OLBPDQ score and QoL domains was significant. Conclusion: DMST improves QoL by a significant reduction in pain in office workers with mechanical LBP.","PeriodicalId":75019,"journal":{"name":"The Indian journal of occupational therapy","volume":"41 1","pages":"121 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian journal of occupational therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoth.ijoth_23_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most jobs nowadays are sedentary in nature. Due to incorrect posture, strain on the spine, pelvis, muscles, tendons, joints, bones, and discs can lead to fatigue and deformation. Low back pain (LBP) is the most common one among all pains. It has a profound impact on the quality of life (QoL). Core training has emerged as a major trend in LBP management and prevention. In Dynamic Muscular Stabilization Training (DMST), adequate dynamic control of lumbar spine forces is achieved, which reduces the repetitive injury to the structures of the spinal segments and related tissues. Thus, the aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of DMST on LBP in office workers. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of DMST in mechanical LBP to improve the QoL in office workers. Study Design: Prospective, experimental, randomized controlled, comparative study design was chosen for the research. Methods: One hundred and twenty-four office workers (male and female, aged 30-50 years) were screened on Cornell musculoskeletal discomfort questionnaire (CMDQ). Fifty office workers were selected after screening, those who met the inclusion criteria (mechanical LBP and CMDQ for lower back more than 1.5). Office workers were equally divided into two groups, namely study group which received DMST and control group which received conventional exercises. Follow-up assessments were conducted at the baseline, 4th week, and 8th week on Oswestry LBP disability questionnaire (OLBPDQ) and World Health Organization QoL-BREF. Results: Both the study (n = 25) and control (n = 25) groups equally improved with their respective intervention. In the study group, LBP reduced more (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.636-14.764) postintervention. Whereas, a significant improvement in physical (P < 0.001, 95% CI: 86.099-91.301) and psychological (P < 0.001, 95% CI: 60.725-69.475) domains of QoL was found in the study group compared to the control group. The correlation between OLBPDQ score and QoL domains was significant. Conclusion: DMST improves QoL by a significant reduction in pain in office workers with mechanical LBP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态肌肉稳定训练对办公室职员机械性腰痛改善生活质量的影响:一项随机对照研究
背景:现在大多数工作本质上都是久坐不动的。由于不正确的姿势,对脊柱、骨盆、肌肉、肌腱、关节、骨骼和椎间盘的压力会导致疲劳和变形。腰痛是所有疼痛中最常见的一种。它对生活质量(QoL)有着深远的影响。核心训练已成为腰痛管理和预防的主要趋势。在动态肌肉稳定训练(DMST)中,实现了对腰椎力的充分动态控制,从而减少了对脊柱节段结构和相关组织的重复性损伤。因此,本研究的目的是评估DMST对上班族LBP的有效性。目的:本研究旨在探讨DMST在机械性腰痛中的作用,以改善上班族的生活质量。研究设计:本研究采用前瞻性、实验性、随机对照、比较研究设计。方法:对124名30 ~ 50岁的上班族(男、女)进行康奈尔肌肉骨骼不适问卷调查(CMDQ)。经筛选,选取50名办公室职员,符合纳入标准(机械性腰痛和腰背部CMDQ大于1.5)。将上班族平均分为两组,实验组接受DMST锻炼,对照组接受常规锻炼。在基线、第4周和第8周对Oswestry下bp残疾问卷(OLBPDQ)和世界卫生组织QoL-BREF进行随访评估。结果:研究组(n = 25)和对照组(n = 25)在各自的干预下均有相同的改善。在研究组中,干预后LBP降低更多(P < 0.001, 95%可信区间[CI]: 10.636-14.764)。然而,与对照组相比,研究组在生理(P < 0.001, 95% CI: 86.099-91.301)和心理(P < 0.001, 95% CI: 60.725-69.475)领域的生活质量有显著改善。OLBPDQ评分与生活质量域有显著相关性。结论:DMST通过显著减轻办公室工作人员机械性腰痛来改善生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality of Occupational Therapy Research in India - A Descriptive Review. Understanding daily routine and schedule of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A qualitative study 35th WFOT council meeting, world ot day and AIOTA's fellowship program Occupational therapy interventions survey study part I: Practices and types of interventions used in daily practice by indian versus global occupational therapists Attitudes of Indian undergraduate occupational therapy students toward mental health and psychiatry: A cross-sectional survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1