[Drug abuse].

R. Westerling
{"title":"[Drug abuse].","authors":"R. Westerling","doi":"10.1097/00041444-199508001-00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The wide array of therapeutic responses to substance use/abuse suggests that there is not one best approach to solve the problems of any one adolescent or young adult. Indeed, most young people require a variety of therapeutic interventions, which may include inpatient treatment, ambulatory therapeutic groups, and individual counseling, as well as self-help groups. In choosing a therapeutic program, the physician must be circumspect when interpreting the reported success or \"cure\" rates of any of these modalities. Such citations often are misleading because frequently they fail to reflect accurately the therapeutic influence of several important patient population variables that distinguish the programs. For example, an outpatient program may report better \"cure\" rates than an inpatient program because the ambulatory program may have enrolled clients who have more limited substance use patterns and who are more committed to abstinence. Furthermore, there is no standard methodology for reporting \"rates of success.\" Some programs simply report a compliance rate for clients who attend meetings or scheduled therapeutic sessions, some report the numbers of clients who complete the program without any reference to recidivism, and some report the numbers of clients who are \"drug-free\" after 1 year. Given these caveats, the experience of most clinicians suggests that many adolescents who experiment with the traditional \"gateway\" drugs (eg, tobacco, alcohol, marijuana) respond well to outpatient group and individual therapy, those adolescents committed to a substance use/abuse pattern respond best to inpatient or residential programs, and adolescents who have a psychiatric/behavioral problem complicated by substance use/abuse require formal psychiatric treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)","PeriodicalId":22178,"journal":{"name":"Svensk farmaceutisk tidskrift","volume":"19 1","pages":"197-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Svensk farmaceutisk tidskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00041444-199508001-00023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The wide array of therapeutic responses to substance use/abuse suggests that there is not one best approach to solve the problems of any one adolescent or young adult. Indeed, most young people require a variety of therapeutic interventions, which may include inpatient treatment, ambulatory therapeutic groups, and individual counseling, as well as self-help groups. In choosing a therapeutic program, the physician must be circumspect when interpreting the reported success or "cure" rates of any of these modalities. Such citations often are misleading because frequently they fail to reflect accurately the therapeutic influence of several important patient population variables that distinguish the programs. For example, an outpatient program may report better "cure" rates than an inpatient program because the ambulatory program may have enrolled clients who have more limited substance use patterns and who are more committed to abstinence. Furthermore, there is no standard methodology for reporting "rates of success." Some programs simply report a compliance rate for clients who attend meetings or scheduled therapeutic sessions, some report the numbers of clients who complete the program without any reference to recidivism, and some report the numbers of clients who are "drug-free" after 1 year. Given these caveats, the experience of most clinicians suggests that many adolescents who experiment with the traditional "gateway" drugs (eg, tobacco, alcohol, marijuana) respond well to outpatient group and individual therapy, those adolescents committed to a substance use/abuse pattern respond best to inpatient or residential programs, and adolescents who have a psychiatric/behavioral problem complicated by substance use/abuse require formal psychiatric treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(吸毒)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Local anesthetics]. [Drug abuse]. [Experiences in information services in pharmacies]. [History of pharmacy in Heidelberg]. [Prescribed drugs benefit. More replies].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1