Influence of reference circles on the evaluation results of axis straightness errors

Zexiang Zhao, Xinyu Zhao, Tianhao Wu
{"title":"Influence of reference circles on the evaluation results of axis straightness errors","authors":"Zexiang Zhao, Xinyu Zhao, Tianhao Wu","doi":"10.1177/00202940231180830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measurement principle of axis straightness error of cylindrical parts was introduced based on their roundness profiles. The evaluation models of the center coordinates of four kinds of the reference circles were built, and the evaluation models of the axis straightness errors were established by using the least-square and minimum zone criteria. The roundness profiles of eight simulated cylinders, eight holes, and eight shafts were extracted, and their axis straightness errors were evaluated based on the different reference circles and evaluation criteria. The “minimax” issues in the evaluation process of axis straightness errors were be solved by using Equilibrium Optimizer, and its implementation flows were given. Their evaluation results were analyzed under the used reference circles and evaluation criteria. The analysis results showed that both reference circles and evaluation criteria have much influence on the evaluation results, and that among the evaluation results based on the centers’ coordinates of four reference circles and two evaluation criteria, the axis straightness errors evaluated based on the center coordinates of least-square reference circle and the minimum zone criteria is the least one for most of cylindrical parts, the roundness profiles of which may have no singularities, and the differences among the axis straightness errors evaluated on the basis of different reference circles and different evaluation criteria are very large sometimes, which should be noted in checking whether the axis straightness errors of parts are qualified.","PeriodicalId":18375,"journal":{"name":"Measurement and Control","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940231180830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement principle of axis straightness error of cylindrical parts was introduced based on their roundness profiles. The evaluation models of the center coordinates of four kinds of the reference circles were built, and the evaluation models of the axis straightness errors were established by using the least-square and minimum zone criteria. The roundness profiles of eight simulated cylinders, eight holes, and eight shafts were extracted, and their axis straightness errors were evaluated based on the different reference circles and evaluation criteria. The “minimax” issues in the evaluation process of axis straightness errors were be solved by using Equilibrium Optimizer, and its implementation flows were given. Their evaluation results were analyzed under the used reference circles and evaluation criteria. The analysis results showed that both reference circles and evaluation criteria have much influence on the evaluation results, and that among the evaluation results based on the centers’ coordinates of four reference circles and two evaluation criteria, the axis straightness errors evaluated based on the center coordinates of least-square reference circle and the minimum zone criteria is the least one for most of cylindrical parts, the roundness profiles of which may have no singularities, and the differences among the axis straightness errors evaluated on the basis of different reference circles and different evaluation criteria are very large sometimes, which should be noted in checking whether the axis straightness errors of parts are qualified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参考圆对轴直线度误差评定结果的影响
介绍了基于圆度轮廓的圆柱零件轴线直线度误差测量原理。建立了四种参考圆中心坐标的评价模型,采用最小二乘准则和最小区域准则建立了轴直线度误差的评价模型。提取了8个仿真圆柱、8个孔和8个轴的圆度轮廓,并根据不同的参考圆和评价标准对其轴线直线度误差进行了评价。利用平衡优化器解决了轴直线度误差评定过程中的“极小极大”问题,给出了平衡优化器的实现流程。根据所采用的参考圈和评价标准对评价结果进行了分析。分析结果表明,参考圆和评价准则对评价结果影响较大,在基于4个参考圆中心坐标和2个评价准则的评价结果中,基于最小二乘参考圆中心坐标和最小区域准则评价的轴直线度误差对大多数圆度轮廓可能不存在奇异点的圆柱件来说是最小的;而根据不同参考圆和不同评定标准评定的轴线直线度误差有时差异很大,在检查零件轴线直线度误差是否合格时应注意这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Train timetable and stopping plan generation based on cross-line passenger flow in high-speed railway network Enhancing water pressure sensing in challenging environments: A strain gage technology integrated with deep learning approach Photovoltaic MPPT control and improvement strategies considering environmental factors: based on PID-type sliding mode control and improved grey wolf optimization Tracking controller design for quadrotor UAVs under external disturbances using a high-order sliding mode-assisted disturbance observer Evaluating vehicle trafficability on soft ground using wheel force information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1