COMPARISON BETWEEN DYNAMIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS WITH ASCE 7-10 AND ASCE 7-16 IN CONCRETE FRAMES WITH VISCOUS DAMPERS INCORPORATED

Juan Sebastián Cundumí García, Orlando Cundumí Sánchez
{"title":"COMPARISON BETWEEN DYNAMIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS WITH ASCE 7-10 AND ASCE 7-16 IN CONCRETE FRAMES WITH VISCOUS DAMPERS INCORPORATED","authors":"Juan Sebastián Cundumí García, Orlando Cundumí Sánchez","doi":"10.7712/120121.8870.19422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last few years, different methodologies have been developed for the analysis of the structural seismic response, such as the performance-based design, the systems of energy dissipation, seismic isolation. Based on these efforts, a number of devices, known collectively as protection systems have emerged. They are divided into three types of systems: passive, active, and semi-active. Passive systems dissipate energy through friction, viscous fluid dampers, and inelastic behavior of the material, among others. On the other hand, active control systems can be implemented by applying time varying forces to counteract those imposed by the excitation. which can be active, passive, semi-active, active, etc. This paper presents the response of the structure when it enters the nonlinear range and is being controlled by the Viscous Damper. To obtain the nonlinear response of the structure system through numerical simulation are used the Methodologies of ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 7-16. To examine the behavior of the structures and the application of each methodology, simulations using concrete frames of 5, 7 and 11-story buildings were performed. The models were subjected to the horizontal components of different earthquakes, for the ASCE 7-10 were used three earthquakes, for the ASCE 7-16 were used seven earthquakes. These seismic records are subjected to a matching process to obtain records that match the corresponding building code design spectrum for a high seismic risk zone. The history displacement and acceleration results were compared with those obtained with the uncontrolled structure with nonlinear behavior.","PeriodicalId":66281,"journal":{"name":"地震工程与工程振动","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"地震工程与工程振动","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7712/120121.8870.19422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the last few years, different methodologies have been developed for the analysis of the structural seismic response, such as the performance-based design, the systems of energy dissipation, seismic isolation. Based on these efforts, a number of devices, known collectively as protection systems have emerged. They are divided into three types of systems: passive, active, and semi-active. Passive systems dissipate energy through friction, viscous fluid dampers, and inelastic behavior of the material, among others. On the other hand, active control systems can be implemented by applying time varying forces to counteract those imposed by the excitation. which can be active, passive, semi-active, active, etc. This paper presents the response of the structure when it enters the nonlinear range and is being controlled by the Viscous Damper. To obtain the nonlinear response of the structure system through numerical simulation are used the Methodologies of ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 7-16. To examine the behavior of the structures and the application of each methodology, simulations using concrete frames of 5, 7 and 11-story buildings were performed. The models were subjected to the horizontal components of different earthquakes, for the ASCE 7-10 were used three earthquakes, for the ASCE 7-16 were used seven earthquakes. These seismic records are subjected to a matching process to obtain records that match the corresponding building code design spectrum for a high seismic risk zone. The history displacement and acceleration results were compared with those obtained with the uncontrolled structure with nonlinear behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加入粘性阻尼器的混凝土框架asce 7-10和asce 7-16动力非线性分析的比较
在过去的几年里,不同的方法已经发展用于分析结构的地震反应,如基于性能的设计,耗能系统,隔震。基于这些努力,出现了一些统称为保护系统的设备。它们分为三种类型的系统:被动、主动和半主动。被动系统通过摩擦、粘性流体阻尼器和材料的非弹性行为等来耗散能量。另一方面,主动控制系统可以通过施加时变力来抵消激励施加的力来实现。可分为主动、被动、半主动、主动等。本文研究了结构在非线性范围内受粘性阻尼器控制时的响应。采用ASCE 7-10和ASCE 7-16方法进行数值模拟,得到结构体系的非线性响应。为了检查结构的行为和每种方法的应用,使用5层、7层和11层建筑的混凝土框架进行了模拟。模型对不同地震的水平分量进行了分析,其中ASCE 7-10使用了3次地震,ASCE 7-16使用了7次地震。这些地震记录经过匹配过程,以获得与高地震危险区相应的建筑规范设计谱相匹配的记录。对具有非线性行为的非受控结构的位移和加速度历史结果进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4781
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
GENETIC OPTIMIZATION FOR THE DESIGN OF SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF PLANE RC FRAMES WITH BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES (BRBS) LARGE-DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY STRUCTURES: COMPARISON BETWEEN ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS AND DEM MODELS INCLUDING OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE CYCLIC TESTING OF 1:40 SCALE CANTILEVER RC ELEMENTS WITH DIGITALLY MANUFACTURED REINFORCEMENT 3D ROCKING MOTION: BLIND PREDICTION CONTEST RESULTS AND INFLUENCE OF EVALUATION METRIC ON THE RANKINGS EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PLASTIC CYCLIC BEHAVIOUR OF SIMPLE STEEL COUPONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1