Dominique Heinke, Eirini Nestoridi, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, Paige L Williams, Janet W Rich-Edwards, Angela E Lin, Carla M Van Bennekom, Allen A Mitchell, Wendy N Nembhard, Ruth C Fretts, Drucilla J Roberts, C Wes Duke, Suzan L Carmichael, Mahsa M Yazdy
{"title":"Risk of Stillbirth for Fetuses With Specific Birth Defects.","authors":"Dominique Heinke, Eirini Nestoridi, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, Paige L Williams, Janet W Rich-Edwards, Angela E Lin, Carla M Van Bennekom, Allen A Mitchell, Wendy N Nembhard, Ruth C Fretts, Drucilla J Roberts, C Wes Duke, Suzan L Carmichael, Mahsa M Yazdy","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000003614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the risk of stillbirth (fetal death at 20 weeks of gestation or more) associated with specific birth defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified a population-based retrospective cohort of neonates and fetuses with selected major birth defects and without known or strongly suspected chromosomal or single-gene disorders from active birth defects surveillance programs in nine states. Abstracted medical records were reviewed by clinical geneticists to confirm and classify all birth defects and birth defect patterns. We estimated risks of stillbirth specific to birth defects among pregnancies overall and among those with isolated birth defects; potential bias owing to elective termination was quantified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 19,170 eligible neonates and fetuses with birth defects, 17,224 were liveborn, 852 stillborn, and 672 electively terminated. Overall, stillbirth risks ranged from 11 per 1,000 fetuses with bladder exstrophy (95% CI 0-57) to 490 per 1,000 fetuses with limb-body-wall complex (95% CI 368-623). Among those with isolated birth defects not affecting major vital organs, elevated risks (per 1,000 fetuses) were observed for cleft lip with cleft palate (10; 95% CI 7-15), transverse limb deficiencies (26; 95% CI 16-39), longitudinal limb deficiencies (11; 95% CI 3-28), and limb defects due to amniotic bands (110; 95% CI 68-171). Quantified bias analysis suggests that failure to account for terminations may lead to up to fourfold underestimation of the observed risks of stillbirth for sacral agenesis (13/1,000; 95% CI 2-47), isolated spina bifida (24/1,000; 95% CI 17-34), and holoprosencephaly (30/1,000; 95% CI 10-68).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Birth defect-specific stillbirth risk was high compared with the U.S. stillbirth risk (6/1,000 fetuses), even for isolated cases of oral clefts and limb defects; elective termination may appreciably bias some estimates. These data can inform clinical care and counseling after prenatal diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":55057,"journal":{"name":"Hereditas","volume":"27 1","pages":"133-140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003614","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the risk of stillbirth (fetal death at 20 weeks of gestation or more) associated with specific birth defects.
Methods: We identified a population-based retrospective cohort of neonates and fetuses with selected major birth defects and without known or strongly suspected chromosomal or single-gene disorders from active birth defects surveillance programs in nine states. Abstracted medical records were reviewed by clinical geneticists to confirm and classify all birth defects and birth defect patterns. We estimated risks of stillbirth specific to birth defects among pregnancies overall and among those with isolated birth defects; potential bias owing to elective termination was quantified.
Results: Of 19,170 eligible neonates and fetuses with birth defects, 17,224 were liveborn, 852 stillborn, and 672 electively terminated. Overall, stillbirth risks ranged from 11 per 1,000 fetuses with bladder exstrophy (95% CI 0-57) to 490 per 1,000 fetuses with limb-body-wall complex (95% CI 368-623). Among those with isolated birth defects not affecting major vital organs, elevated risks (per 1,000 fetuses) were observed for cleft lip with cleft palate (10; 95% CI 7-15), transverse limb deficiencies (26; 95% CI 16-39), longitudinal limb deficiencies (11; 95% CI 3-28), and limb defects due to amniotic bands (110; 95% CI 68-171). Quantified bias analysis suggests that failure to account for terminations may lead to up to fourfold underestimation of the observed risks of stillbirth for sacral agenesis (13/1,000; 95% CI 2-47), isolated spina bifida (24/1,000; 95% CI 17-34), and holoprosencephaly (30/1,000; 95% CI 10-68).
Conclusion: Birth defect-specific stillbirth risk was high compared with the U.S. stillbirth risk (6/1,000 fetuses), even for isolated cases of oral clefts and limb defects; elective termination may appreciably bias some estimates. These data can inform clinical care and counseling after prenatal diagnosis.
目的估算与特定出生缺陷相关的死胎(妊娠 20 周或更长时间的胎儿死亡)风险:方法:我们从美国九个州的出生缺陷监测项目中筛选出患有特定主要出生缺陷的新生儿和胎儿,这些新生儿和胎儿没有已知或强烈怀疑的染色体或单基因疾病。临床遗传学家对抽取的医疗记录进行了审查,以确认所有出生缺陷和出生缺陷模式并对其进行分类。我们估算了整体妊娠和孤立出生缺陷妊娠中因出生缺陷导致死胎的风险,并对选择性终止妊娠可能造成的偏差进行了量化:在 19170 名符合条件的新生儿和出生缺陷胎儿中,活产 17224 例,死产 852 例,选择性终止妊娠 672 例。总体而言,死胎风险从膀胱外翻的千分之十一(95% CI 0-57)到肢体-体壁复合体的千分之四百九十(95% CI 368-623)不等。在不影响主要重要器官的孤立出生缺陷中,观察到唇裂伴腭裂(10;95% CI 7-15)、横向肢体缺损(26;95% CI 16-39)、纵向肢体缺损(11;95% CI 3-28)和羊膜带导致的肢体缺损(110;95% CI 68-171)的风险升高(每千名胎儿)。量化偏差分析表明,如果不考虑终止妊娠,可能会导致骶骨发育不全(13/1,000;95% CI 2-47)、孤立性脊柱裂(24/1,000;95% CI 17-34)和全瘫(30/1,000;95% CI 10-68)的死胎风险被低估四倍:结论:与美国的死胎风险(6/1000)相比,出生缺陷特异性死胎风险很高,即使是孤立的口腔裂隙和肢体缺陷病例;选择性终止妊娠可能会明显偏离某些估计值。这些数据可为产前诊断后的临床护理和咨询提供参考。
期刊介绍:
For almost a century, Hereditas has published original cutting-edge research and reviews. As the Official journal of the Mendelian Society of Lund, the journal welcomes research from across all areas of genetics and genomics. Topics of interest include human and medical genetics, animal and plant genetics, microbial genetics, agriculture and bioinformatics.