The Legal Regime of Property of De Facto Spouses

D. O. Osmanova
{"title":"The Legal Regime of Property of De Facto Spouses","authors":"D. O. Osmanova","doi":"10.18572/1812-3929-2023-3-48-54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The applicable laws do not regulate the legal regime of property relations between de facto spouses notwithstanding the growing number of such forms of family structure. The judicial practice follows the logic of regulations and, inter alia, ignores the pressing need to solve the issues related to property protection of parties to such union. Multiple appeals to courts falling within the indicated dispute categories are solved in an extremely formal manner when claimants in need of protection are left without it because of the absence of due regulation. The motive for writing the article was a recent ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, when the court arrived at a bold conclusion extremely dangerous for further use on the a priori gratuitous character of reciprocal grants of de facto spouses. The author provides logical grounds to prove inconsistency of the conclusions proposed by the supreme judicial authority, insists on the need for acknowledgment of the opportunity to change the property regime at the establishment of a de facto marriage relation and application to such persons of the legal provisions dedicated to a simple partnership agreement for legal justification of the origination of the regime of joint shared ownership in respect of property acquired by de facto spouses. It is important to differentiate family law problems that may arise in case of formalization of the cohabitation institution, indifferent civil law spheres and the objective need to create an efficient mechanism of protection of property rights of parties to such union.","PeriodicalId":81750,"journal":{"name":"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2023-3-48-54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The applicable laws do not regulate the legal regime of property relations between de facto spouses notwithstanding the growing number of such forms of family structure. The judicial practice follows the logic of regulations and, inter alia, ignores the pressing need to solve the issues related to property protection of parties to such union. Multiple appeals to courts falling within the indicated dispute categories are solved in an extremely formal manner when claimants in need of protection are left without it because of the absence of due regulation. The motive for writing the article was a recent ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, when the court arrived at a bold conclusion extremely dangerous for further use on the a priori gratuitous character of reciprocal grants of de facto spouses. The author provides logical grounds to prove inconsistency of the conclusions proposed by the supreme judicial authority, insists on the need for acknowledgment of the opportunity to change the property regime at the establishment of a de facto marriage relation and application to such persons of the legal provisions dedicated to a simple partnership agreement for legal justification of the origination of the regime of joint shared ownership in respect of property acquired by de facto spouses. It is important to differentiate family law problems that may arise in case of formalization of the cohabitation institution, indifferent civil law spheres and the objective need to create an efficient mechanism of protection of property rights of parties to such union.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
事实配偶财产的法律制度
尽管这种形式的家庭结构越来越多,但适用的法律并没有规定事实上的配偶之间财产关系的法律制度。司法实践遵循规则逻辑,除其他外,忽视了迫切需要解决与这种联盟当事方的财产保护有关的问题。在需要保护的索赔人由于缺乏适当的管制而得不到保护的情况下,向属于上述争端类别的法院提出的多项上诉以极其正式的方式得到解决。写这篇文章的动机是俄罗斯联邦最高法院最近的一项裁决,当时法院对事实配偶相互给予的先天无理由性质作出了一个大胆的结论,这一结论对于进一步使用是极其危险的。发件人提供了合乎逻辑的理由来证明最高司法当局提出的结论不一致,坚持认为有必要承认在建立事实上的婚姻关系时改变财产制度的机会,并对这些人适用专门用于简单合伙协议的法律规定,以证明就事实上的配偶所取得的财产建立共同所有权制度的法律理由。重要的是要区分同居制度正式化时可能出现的家庭法问题、不同的民法领域以及建立有效机制保护这种结合各方产权的客观需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subjects of Legal Relations of Digital Platforms as a Financial Technology Implementation Mechanism The Metaverse and Tasks in the Sphere of Legal Regulation of Data Cyber Sports vs. E-Sports: On the Conceptual Framework Features of Exercising of Digital Rights The Legal Regime of Property of De Facto Spouses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1