Did China follow the East Asian development model

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Comparative Economics Pub Date : 2009-12-01 DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139962858.009
A. Boltho, M. Weber
{"title":"Did China follow the East Asian development model","authors":"A. Boltho, M. Weber","doi":"10.1017/CBO9781139962858.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China is located in East Asia and, just as Japan, Taiwan or (South) Korea at earlier stages of their development, has now grown very rapidly for some three decades. That is not enough, however, for it to qualify for membership of the club. The East Asian development model has a number of additional and important characteristics. Four are selected for discussion: the almost constant encouragement given to investment, the manufacturing sector and external competitiveness, and pursued via a variety of fairly interventionist industrial, trade and financial policies; a concomitant belief in the virtues of intense domestic (Japan and Taiwan) and foreign (Korea) competition; a set of broadly sensible and appropriate macroeconomic policies; and a number of favourable (pre-)conditions, such as the presence of a homogeneous population, a relatively high stock of human capital, reasonable income equality and fairly authoritarian governments. China, since reforms began in the late 1970s, has shared some of these characteristics, but not all. In particular, it is still much more of a command economy than the other three countries have ever been, yet, at the same time, has embraced globalization with, arguably, much greater enthusiasm than was done, in earlier times, by Japan, Taiwan or Korea. If China's experience, however, is compared with that of other, more or less successful, developing countries, the similarities with the East Asia development model would seem to dwarf such differences","PeriodicalId":43449,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Comparative Economics","volume":"17 1","pages":"267-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"57","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Comparative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139962858.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

Abstract

China is located in East Asia and, just as Japan, Taiwan or (South) Korea at earlier stages of their development, has now grown very rapidly for some three decades. That is not enough, however, for it to qualify for membership of the club. The East Asian development model has a number of additional and important characteristics. Four are selected for discussion: the almost constant encouragement given to investment, the manufacturing sector and external competitiveness, and pursued via a variety of fairly interventionist industrial, trade and financial policies; a concomitant belief in the virtues of intense domestic (Japan and Taiwan) and foreign (Korea) competition; a set of broadly sensible and appropriate macroeconomic policies; and a number of favourable (pre-)conditions, such as the presence of a homogeneous population, a relatively high stock of human capital, reasonable income equality and fairly authoritarian governments. China, since reforms began in the late 1970s, has shared some of these characteristics, but not all. In particular, it is still much more of a command economy than the other three countries have ever been, yet, at the same time, has embraced globalization with, arguably, much greater enthusiasm than was done, in earlier times, by Japan, Taiwan or Korea. If China's experience, however, is compared with that of other, more or less successful, developing countries, the similarities with the East Asia development model would seem to dwarf such differences
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国是否遵循了东亚发展模式
中国位于东亚,就像日本、台湾或(韩国)在发展的早期阶段一样,现在已经快速增长了大约30年。然而,这还不足以使它有资格成为该俱乐部的成员。东亚发展模式还有其他一些重要特点。本文选择了四个方面进行讨论:对投资、制造业和外部竞争力给予几乎持续的鼓励,并通过各种相当干涉主义的工业、贸易和金融政策来实现;随之而来的是对激烈的国内(日本和台湾)和国外(韩国)竞争的好处的信念;一套大体合理和适当的宏观经济政策;还有一些有利的(前提)条件,比如同质人口的存在、相对较高的人力资本存量、合理的收入平等和相当专制的政府。自20世纪70年代末开始改革以来,中国已经具备了其中的一些特征,但并非全部。尤其值得一提的是,与其他三个国家相比,中国仍然更像一个计划经济,然而,与此同时,可以说,它以比早期日本、台湾或韩国更大的热情接受了全球化。然而,如果将中国的经验与其他或多或少成功的发展中国家进行比较,中国与东亚发展模式的相似之处似乎会使这些差异相形见绌
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Comparative Economics
European Journal of Comparative Economics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Several years have elapsed since the beginning of transition in Eastern Europe, and the profession has learnt a lot about the importance of institutions in the economy and our deep need for additional research on their influence on the interaction of the units that play the economic game. The study of economies that do not fit the paradigm of the competitive market, a field of enquiry that used to belong to the sideline of scientific enquiry, has been joined by leading scientists in the field, who were inspired by the new knowledge gained through the processes of transition and intrigued bthe policy problems posed by transformation of bureaucratically run socialist economies into capitalist market economies. The same institutional and social understanding is equally relevant to questions of conomic development, to the elimination of cleavages between North and South, and to the solution of problems of globalization.
期刊最新文献
Oil price shocks, equity markets, and contagion effect in OECD countries Export-led growth or growth-led exports? Western Europe in the "golden age" Energy policy of fossil fuel–producing countries: does global energy transition matter? Economic integration and exchange rate arrangements in the post-soviet period : The Baltic states in comparative perspective Globalization, regulation and profitability of banks: a comparative analysis of Europe, United States, India and China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1