Fiabilidad interobservador del test de movilidad pasiva accesoria intervertebral lumbar y su correlación con la galvanopalpación en sujetos sanos

F.J. Minaya Muñoz, F. Valera Garrido, X. Veiga Monasterioguren
{"title":"Fiabilidad interobservador del test de movilidad pasiva accesoria intervertebral lumbar y su correlación con la galvanopalpación en sujetos sanos","authors":"F.J. Minaya Muñoz,&nbsp;F. Valera Garrido,&nbsp;X. Veiga Monasterioguren","doi":"10.1016/j.rifk.2009.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The physical therapy diagnosis of a vertebral dysfunction is essential in order to classify musculoskeletal diseases. Passive assessment of quantity and quality of movement on the different vertebral segments guides the decision-making process relative to manual therapy treatment.</p><p>The aims of this present study have been to determine the interobserver reliability of passive accessory intervertebral postero-anterior unilateral lumbar motion test as a test to identify subjects with joint dysfunction, and to analyze galvanic current as a diagnostic tool to identify joint dysfunction in the lumbar spine with the motion test.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Two physiotherapists, experts in manual therapy, carried out the test in 30 asymptomatic subjects at L1 to L5 levels (right and left sides), performing a total of 300 tests. To determine the diagnostic value of galvanic current, two other physiotherapists performed galvanic palpation consecutively to the motion test in lumbar zygapophysial joints in the same asymptomatic subjects.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Percentage agreement was 86.3% for the motion test. The Kappa index showed substantial agreement (according to Landis and Koch, 1977) (<em>k</em>=0.5). PA accessory motion test was more reliable to identify symptomatic spinal L4-L5 and L5-S1 level.</p><p>Regarding galvanic palpation, the agreement percentage was 83%. Kappa coefficient (k) showed moderate agreement for identification of joint dysfunction (<em>k</em>=0.41). Sensitivity was high in the lumbar level L3-L4 and L4-L5 and was low in L1-L2 level; specificity was high (82.7–96.3%) throughout the lumbar spine.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Interobserver reliability of the passive motion test is moderate (<em>k</em>=0.5).</p><p>Galvanic palpation identifies joint dysfunction, however sensitivity is low in the upper lumbar spine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101113,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 4-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rifk.2009.09.002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138604510000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

The physical therapy diagnosis of a vertebral dysfunction is essential in order to classify musculoskeletal diseases. Passive assessment of quantity and quality of movement on the different vertebral segments guides the decision-making process relative to manual therapy treatment.

The aims of this present study have been to determine the interobserver reliability of passive accessory intervertebral postero-anterior unilateral lumbar motion test as a test to identify subjects with joint dysfunction, and to analyze galvanic current as a diagnostic tool to identify joint dysfunction in the lumbar spine with the motion test.

Material and methods

Two physiotherapists, experts in manual therapy, carried out the test in 30 asymptomatic subjects at L1 to L5 levels (right and left sides), performing a total of 300 tests. To determine the diagnostic value of galvanic current, two other physiotherapists performed galvanic palpation consecutively to the motion test in lumbar zygapophysial joints in the same asymptomatic subjects.

Results

Percentage agreement was 86.3% for the motion test. The Kappa index showed substantial agreement (according to Landis and Koch, 1977) (k=0.5). PA accessory motion test was more reliable to identify symptomatic spinal L4-L5 and L5-S1 level.

Regarding galvanic palpation, the agreement percentage was 83%. Kappa coefficient (k) showed moderate agreement for identification of joint dysfunction (k=0.41). Sensitivity was high in the lumbar level L3-L4 and L4-L5 and was low in L1-L2 level; specificity was high (82.7–96.3%) throughout the lumbar spine.

Conclusions

Interobserver reliability of the passive motion test is moderate (k=0.5).

Galvanic palpation identifies joint dysfunction, however sensitivity is low in the upper lumbar spine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎间辅助被动活动试验的观察者间可靠性及其与健康受试者电镀锌的相关性
椎体功能障碍的物理治疗诊断是必要的,以分类肌肉骨骼疾病。相对于手工治疗,被动评估不同椎节上运动的数量和质量指导决策过程。本研究的目的是确定被动式副椎间后前侧单侧腰椎运动试验作为识别关节功能障碍试验的观察者之间的可靠性,并分析电流作为诊断工具,通过运动试验来识别腰椎关节功能障碍。材料和方法2名物理治疗师,手工治疗专家,对30名无症状受试者进行L1至L5水平(右侧和左侧)的测试,共进行300次测试。为了确定电电流的诊断价值,另外两名物理治疗师对同一无症状受试者的腰椎关节进行了连续的电触诊和运动试验。结果运动测试的符合率为86.3%。Kappa指数显示了实质性的一致(根据Landis和Koch, 1977) (k=0.5)。PA辅助运动试验对诊断症状性脊髓L4-L5和L5-S1水平更可靠。电触诊的符合率为83%。Kappa系数(k)对关节功能障碍的识别有中等程度的一致性(k=0.41)。腰椎L3-L4和L4-L5水平敏感性高,L1-L2水平敏感性低;整个腰椎特异性高(82.7-96.3%)。结论被动运动测试的观察者信度为中等(k=0.5)。电触诊可识别关节功能障碍,但上腰椎的敏感性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disminución del dolor en cervicalgias mediante la aplicación de microcorrientes Arquitectura muscular y momento de fuerza: relación en el erector espinal durante extensión isométrica máxima Efectos de la técnica de Mulligan en un paciente quemado. A propósito de un caso Procedimiento fisioterapéutico en esclerosis múltiple en fase aguda. A propósito de 2 casos Calidad de la información sobre ejercicios en las páginas de Internet dirigida a sobrevivientes de cáncer de seno
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1