The Crisis of Legitimacy and the Appropriation of Resistance in Capitalism

Jernej Amon Prodnik
{"title":"The Crisis of Legitimacy and the Appropriation of Resistance in Capitalism","authors":"Jernej Amon Prodnik","doi":"10.31269/triplec.v21i1.1403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capitalism has become so naturalised in recent decades that there seems to exist little to no alternative to it. Common acceptance of this social formation begs the basic question of how particular systems are legitimised. In this paper, I look at some legitimation mechanisms at play by focusing on the capitalist tendency to ideologically appropriate criticism emerging from social struggles. I draw on the study The New Spirit of Capitalism by Boltanski and Chiapello and the cool capitalism thesis put forward by McGuigan. Both provide a basis for a case study of two advertising campaigns by Slovenia’s biggest mobile network operators. During the period of mass uprisings following the 2008/09 economic crisis, the two operators harnessed the symbolism of resistance in their advertising targeted at young people. In each case, the messages of the protests in the ads were deradicalised and largely stripped of any meaningful political content. While it is clear the advertising industry plays an important systemic role in capitalism, the two case studies hint at another way that advertisements can help perpetuate the system: by reinterpreting the critical messages emerging from within society, they become neutralised, with the critical voices thereby becoming more easily integrated into the capitalist social structure.","PeriodicalId":45788,"journal":{"name":"TRIPLEC-Communication Capitalism & Critique","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRIPLEC-Communication Capitalism & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v21i1.1403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capitalism has become so naturalised in recent decades that there seems to exist little to no alternative to it. Common acceptance of this social formation begs the basic question of how particular systems are legitimised. In this paper, I look at some legitimation mechanisms at play by focusing on the capitalist tendency to ideologically appropriate criticism emerging from social struggles. I draw on the study The New Spirit of Capitalism by Boltanski and Chiapello and the cool capitalism thesis put forward by McGuigan. Both provide a basis for a case study of two advertising campaigns by Slovenia’s biggest mobile network operators. During the period of mass uprisings following the 2008/09 economic crisis, the two operators harnessed the symbolism of resistance in their advertising targeted at young people. In each case, the messages of the protests in the ads were deradicalised and largely stripped of any meaningful political content. While it is clear the advertising industry plays an important systemic role in capitalism, the two case studies hint at another way that advertisements can help perpetuate the system: by reinterpreting the critical messages emerging from within society, they become neutralised, with the critical voices thereby becoming more easily integrated into the capitalist social structure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资本主义的合法性危机与抵抗的挪用
近几十年来,资本主义已经变得如此自然,似乎几乎没有其他选择。对这种社会形态的普遍接受回避了一个基本问题,即特定的制度是如何合法化的。在本文中,我通过关注资本主义倾向于从社会斗争中产生的意识形态上适当的批评,来研究一些起作用的合法化机制。我借鉴了Boltanski和Chiapello的研究《资本主义的新精神》和McGuigan提出的酷资本主义理论。两者都为斯洛文尼亚最大的移动网络运营商的两个广告活动的案例研究提供了基础。在2008/09年经济危机之后的大规模起义期间,这两家运营商在针对年轻人的广告中利用了抵抗的象征意义。在每一种情况下,广告中抗议的信息都被去极端化了,基本上没有任何有意义的政治内容。虽然很明显,广告业在资本主义中扮演着重要的系统角色,但这两个案例研究暗示了广告可以帮助系统永久化的另一种方式:通过重新解释来自社会内部的批评信息,它们变得中立,批评的声音因此变得更容易融入资本主义社会结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advertising – a Necessary “Elixir of Life” for Capitalism: On the Critique of the Political Economy of Advertising How Work as a Category of Thought Has Been Disrupted in Neoliberal Capitalist Societies Media, Journalism, and the Public Sphere in Private Family Ownership. On the Critique of the Political Economy of Capitalist Media Enterprises “There is a better you in you”: Promises and Ideologies of Self-Tracking Technologies Toward a Reevaluation of Siegfried Kracauer and the Frankfurt School
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1