Protocol for a Pilot Study of the NODE Trial, a Prospective Multicentre Randomised Trial of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for High-Risk Prostate Cancer

G. McClintock, Hadia Khanani, A. de Rosa, S. Leslie, N. Ahmadi, J. Fallot, P. Ferguson, H. Woo
{"title":"Protocol for a Pilot Study of the NODE Trial, a Prospective Multicentre Randomised Trial of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for High-Risk Prostate Cancer","authors":"G. McClintock, Hadia Khanani, A. de Rosa, S. Leslie, N. Ahmadi, J. Fallot, P. Ferguson, H. Woo","doi":"10.48083/hahe3801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To test the hypothesis that a randomised trial of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) can recruit at a rate acceptable for a larger scale trial. To compare the following secondary endpoints between the 2 arms: the rate of protocol violations, the intraoperative and postoperative morbidity of ePLND, and complications, and to evaluate short-term oncological outcomes comparing biochemical recurrence, clinical recurrence, and survival between arms. Patients and Methods A pilot study will be undertaken at Chris O’Brien Lifehouse and Royal Prince Alfred Hospitals for the NODE trial. Twenty patients will be randomised 1:1 to radical prostatectomy with or withoutePLND. Eligible participants will have high-risk prostate cancer and will be scheduled for robotic radical prostatectomy. High-risk disease will be defined as in the 2019 NCCN guidelines (stage ≥ T3a, ISUP Grade Group ≥ 4 or PSA ≥ 20ng/mL). PSMA PET/CT staging not showing any extraprostatic disease will be required. Quality control measures to ensure consistent delivery of high-quality extended lymph node dissections are in place,and surgeons have been selected for their consistent ability to perform such procedures. Results The trial is currently underway. Conclusion On current available evidence, it is unclear if ePLND provides additional benefit over radicalprostatectomy.","PeriodicalId":21961,"journal":{"name":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48083/hahe3801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives To test the hypothesis that a randomised trial of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) can recruit at a rate acceptable for a larger scale trial. To compare the following secondary endpoints between the 2 arms: the rate of protocol violations, the intraoperative and postoperative morbidity of ePLND, and complications, and to evaluate short-term oncological outcomes comparing biochemical recurrence, clinical recurrence, and survival between arms. Patients and Methods A pilot study will be undertaken at Chris O’Brien Lifehouse and Royal Prince Alfred Hospitals for the NODE trial. Twenty patients will be randomised 1:1 to radical prostatectomy with or withoutePLND. Eligible participants will have high-risk prostate cancer and will be scheduled for robotic radical prostatectomy. High-risk disease will be defined as in the 2019 NCCN guidelines (stage ≥ T3a, ISUP Grade Group ≥ 4 or PSA ≥ 20ng/mL). PSMA PET/CT staging not showing any extraprostatic disease will be required. Quality control measures to ensure consistent delivery of high-quality extended lymph node dissections are in place,and surgeons have been selected for their consistent ability to perform such procedures. Results The trial is currently underway. Conclusion On current available evidence, it is unclear if ePLND provides additional benefit over radicalprostatectomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NODE试验的试点研究方案,这是一项前瞻性多中心随机试验,用于扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗高危前列腺癌
目的验证一项扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫(ePLND)的随机试验是否能够以可接受的速率进行更大规模的试验。比较两组间的以下次要终点:方案违反率、术中和术后ePLND的发病率和并发症,并比较两组间生化复发、临床复发和生存率的短期肿瘤预后。患者和方法将在Chris O 'Brien Lifehouse和Royal Prince Alfred医院进行NODE试验的试点研究。20名患者将按1:1随机分组,接受根治性前列腺切除术,伴或不伴plnd。符合条件的参与者将患有高风险前列腺癌,并将计划进行机器人根治性前列腺切除术。高危疾病将在2019年NCCN指南中定义(分期≥T3a, ISUP分级组≥4或PSA≥20ng/mL)。PSMA PET/CT分期未显示前列腺外病变。质量控制措施,以确保持续交付高质量的延伸淋巴结清扫是到位的,外科医生已经选择了他们一贯的能力来执行这类程序。试验目前正在进行中。结论根据现有证据,尚不清楚ePLND是否比根治性前列腺切除术有更多的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education: A Bladder Cancer Consultation with ChatGPT Perioperative Blood Transfusion Is Associated with Worse Survival in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer RE: Prevalence of MRI Lesions in Men Responding to a GP-Led Invitation for a Prostate Health Check: A Prospective Cohort Study Quality and Readability of Google Search Information on HoLEP for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia A Quality and Completeness Assessment of Testicular Cancer Health Information on TikTok
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1