Measurement uncertainty for detection of visual impurities in granular feed and food materials in relation to the investigated amount of material

L. V. van Raamsdonk, H. van der Voet
{"title":"Measurement uncertainty for detection of visual impurities in granular feed and food materials in relation to the investigated amount of material","authors":"L. V. van Raamsdonk, H. van der Voet","doi":"10.1080/19440049.2022.2066193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The presence is regulated of visually detectable seeds from a selection of toxic plants and fungi mycelium bodies (sclerotia) in feed (Directive 2002/32/EC) and in food (Regulation (EC) 1881/2006). Homogenisation as typical for chemical analyses is not applicable, and dedicated approaches are needed for visual examination methods. Visual methods require two parameters to characterise measurement uncertainties for both unit counts and unit weights. A new approach is to divide approximately 2 kg of sample material into four subsamples of approximately 500 g and to separately examine the four subsamples for numbers and particle weights of seeds or sclerotia. This study is the first to produce datasets on inhomogeneity among subsamples of a sample for visually detectable undesirable substances. Analytical thresholds were calculated from a simulation model and bootstrap procedures based on our data. The analytical thresholds assuring a controlled false-negative rate of 5% for decisions in compliance with legal limits depend on the diversity of the unit counts and weights, the level of the legal limit and the amount of material examined initially in the step-wise approach, either one or two subsamples. A procedure is proposed for examination in practice where only two subsamples, or alternatively even only one subsample, would be examined. If the resulting level of contamination exceeds the relevant threshold additional subsamples need to be examined as well. In most of the investigated cases, analytical thresholds could be established for the examination of just one subsample (500 g) taken from a sample of 2 kg. However, for ergot sclerotia in food with a legal limit of 200 mg kg−1, at least two subsamples (1000 g) need to be examined in the first step. Other groups of visually detectable undesirable substances exist which need further attention. Graphical Abstract","PeriodicalId":12121,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A","volume":"20 1","pages":"1265 - 1283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2022.2066193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The presence is regulated of visually detectable seeds from a selection of toxic plants and fungi mycelium bodies (sclerotia) in feed (Directive 2002/32/EC) and in food (Regulation (EC) 1881/2006). Homogenisation as typical for chemical analyses is not applicable, and dedicated approaches are needed for visual examination methods. Visual methods require two parameters to characterise measurement uncertainties for both unit counts and unit weights. A new approach is to divide approximately 2 kg of sample material into four subsamples of approximately 500 g and to separately examine the four subsamples for numbers and particle weights of seeds or sclerotia. This study is the first to produce datasets on inhomogeneity among subsamples of a sample for visually detectable undesirable substances. Analytical thresholds were calculated from a simulation model and bootstrap procedures based on our data. The analytical thresholds assuring a controlled false-negative rate of 5% for decisions in compliance with legal limits depend on the diversity of the unit counts and weights, the level of the legal limit and the amount of material examined initially in the step-wise approach, either one or two subsamples. A procedure is proposed for examination in practice where only two subsamples, or alternatively even only one subsample, would be examined. If the resulting level of contamination exceeds the relevant threshold additional subsamples need to be examined as well. In most of the investigated cases, analytical thresholds could be established for the examination of just one subsample (500 g) taken from a sample of 2 kg. However, for ergot sclerotia in food with a legal limit of 200 mg kg−1, at least two subsamples (1000 g) need to be examined in the first step. Other groups of visually detectable undesirable substances exist which need further attention. Graphical Abstract
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颗粒饲料和食品原料中视觉杂质检测的测量不确定度与所调查物料量的关系
饲料(指令2002/32/EC)和食品(法规(EC) 1881/2006)中有毒植物和真菌菌丝体(菌核)的目视可检测种子的存在受到监管。化学分析中典型的均质化不适用,目视检查方法需要专门的方法。目测方法需要两个参数来表征单位计数和单位权重的测量不确定度。一种新的方法是将大约2公斤的样品材料分成四个大约500克的子样品,并分别检查四个子样品的种子或菌核的数量和颗粒重量。这项研究是第一个产生的数据集在一个样品的子样品之间的不均匀性的视觉检测不良物质。分析阈值是根据我们的数据从模拟模型和bootstrap程序计算出来的。确保符合法律限制的决定的假阴性率控制在5%的分析阈值取决于单位计数和权重的多样性,法律限制的水平以及在逐步方法中最初检查的材料数量,一个或两个子样本。提出了一种在实践中只检查两个子样本,或者甚至只检查一个子样本的检查程序。如果产生的污染水平超过相关阈值,还需要检查额外的子样本。在大多数调查的病例中,可以为从2公斤样品中提取的一个子样品(500克)的检查建立分析阈值。然而,对于法定限量为200 mg kg - 1的食品中的麦角菌菌核,在第一步中至少需要检查两个子样品(1000 g)。还有一些目测不到的不良物质需要进一步注意。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Infant nutrition at risk: a global systematic review of ochratoxin A in human breast milk-human health risk assessment. Determination and evaluation of canthaxanthin and β-apo-8'-carotenoid ethyl ester in chicken eggs and meat in Tianjin. A worldwide systematic review of ochratoxin A in various coffee products - human exposure and health risk assessment. Determination of azodicarbonamide in flour samples using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with xanthydrol pre-column derivatisation. Food process contaminants: formation, occurrence, risk assessment and mitigation strategies – a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1