Effects of Post–Isometric Relaxation on Ankle Plantarflexion and Timed Flutter Kick in Pediatric Competitive Swimmers

Lauren Noto-Bell, Brittany N Vogel, Danielle E Senn
{"title":"Effects of Post–Isometric Relaxation on Ankle Plantarflexion and Timed Flutter Kick in Pediatric Competitive Swimmers","authors":"Lauren Noto-Bell, Brittany N Vogel, Danielle E Senn","doi":"10.7556/jaoa.2019.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Context Ankle plantarflexion is thought to play an important role in swimming performance; thus, coaches and swimmers often seek ways to increase range of motion (ROM) in the ankles. Objective To assess whether osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), specifically applying the muscle energy technique (MET) principle of post–isometric relaxation, increases ankle plantarflexion and therefore improves swimming performance. Methods Healthy young male and female competitive swimmers were randomly assigned to either a control, sham, or MET group. At baseline, ankle plantarflexion was measured via goniometer, and a 25-yard flutter kick swim with a kickboard was timed. After receiving the ascribed intervention, the ankle plantarflexion measurements and timed flutter kick were repeated. The initial plantarflexion measurement was retrospectively used to determine the presence of somatic dysfunction, by way of restricted motion, with reference to expected normal ranges based on age and gender. Paired t tests were used to analyze the pre- to postintervention changes in ROM and flutter kick speed within each group. Results Fifty-five swimmers (32 girls and 23 boys; mean age, 12 years) participated in this study. Sixteen participants were in the control group, 17 in the sham group, and 22 in the MET intervention group. Among participants with restricted ROM, those in the MET group showed a statistically significant increase in ankle plantarflexion for the left and right ankles (P=.041 and P=.011, respectively). There was no significant difference in ROM of the control or sham groups. For flutter kick speed, there was no significant pre- to postintervention difference in any group. Conclusion Although a single application of MET, using post–isometric relaxation, on participants with restricted ROM immediately significantly increased swimmers’ ROM for bilateral ankle plantarflexion, it did not immediately improve their swimming performance.","PeriodicalId":16639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"569 - 577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2019.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Context Ankle plantarflexion is thought to play an important role in swimming performance; thus, coaches and swimmers often seek ways to increase range of motion (ROM) in the ankles. Objective To assess whether osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), specifically applying the muscle energy technique (MET) principle of post–isometric relaxation, increases ankle plantarflexion and therefore improves swimming performance. Methods Healthy young male and female competitive swimmers were randomly assigned to either a control, sham, or MET group. At baseline, ankle plantarflexion was measured via goniometer, and a 25-yard flutter kick swim with a kickboard was timed. After receiving the ascribed intervention, the ankle plantarflexion measurements and timed flutter kick were repeated. The initial plantarflexion measurement was retrospectively used to determine the presence of somatic dysfunction, by way of restricted motion, with reference to expected normal ranges based on age and gender. Paired t tests were used to analyze the pre- to postintervention changes in ROM and flutter kick speed within each group. Results Fifty-five swimmers (32 girls and 23 boys; mean age, 12 years) participated in this study. Sixteen participants were in the control group, 17 in the sham group, and 22 in the MET intervention group. Among participants with restricted ROM, those in the MET group showed a statistically significant increase in ankle plantarflexion for the left and right ankles (P=.041 and P=.011, respectively). There was no significant difference in ROM of the control or sham groups. For flutter kick speed, there was no significant pre- to postintervention difference in any group. Conclusion Although a single application of MET, using post–isometric relaxation, on participants with restricted ROM immediately significantly increased swimmers’ ROM for bilateral ankle plantarflexion, it did not immediately improve their swimming performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等长后放松对儿童竞技游泳运动员踝关节跖屈和定时扑踢的影响
踝关节跖屈被认为在游泳表现中起着重要作用;因此,教练和游泳运动员经常寻求增加脚踝活动范围(ROM)的方法。目的探讨骨疗法手法治疗(OMT),特别是应用肌肉能量技术(MET)原理进行等距后放松,是否能增加踝关节跖屈,从而提高游泳成绩。方法健康的年轻男女竞技游泳运动员随机分为对照组、假手术组和MET组。基线时,通过测角仪测量踝关节跖屈曲度,并对使用踢水板进行25码颤踢游泳进行计时。在接受指定的干预后,重复测量踝关节跖屈和定时扑动踢。最初的跖屈曲测量是回顾性的,通过限制运动来确定躯体功能障碍的存在,参考基于年龄和性别的预期正常范围。采用配对t检验分析各组干预前后ROM和颤振踢腿速度的变化。结果游泳运动员55人,其中女生32人,男生23人;平均年龄12岁)参加本研究。对照组16人,假手术组17人,MET干预组22人。在ROM受限的参与者中,MET组的左、右踝关节跖屈曲有统计学意义上的显著增加(P=。041和P=。011年,分别)。对照组和假手术组的ROM无显著性差异。对于扑动踢腿速度,任何组在干预前和干预后都没有显著差异。结论:虽然对限制踝关节屈曲的参与者单次应用MET,使用后等距放松,可以立即显著增加游泳者的双侧踝关节屈曲活动度,但并不能立即提高他们的游泳成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous neonatal subcutaneous emphysema: analysis of neonatal management Further insight on AOA ophthalmology residency program closure data Cranial osteopathic techniques and electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power: a controlled crossover trial Response to “Further insight on AOA ophthalmology residency program closure data” UGRC 2021 recommendations on GME transition: pros and cons, opportunities and limitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1