A mixed logit model of U.K. household demand for alternative-fuel vehicles.

IF 0.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ECONOMICS International Journal of Transport Economics Pub Date : 2004-02-01 DOI:10.1400/16901
R. Batley, J. Toner, M. J. Knight
{"title":"A mixed logit model of U.K. household demand for alternative-fuel vehicles.","authors":"R. Batley, J. Toner, M. J. Knight","doi":"10.1400/16901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerns regarding the environmental impacts of petrol and diesel cars have stimulated the development of vehicle technologies based on alternative fuels. In contrast to the scientific research which has led to these significant technological developments, there has been a relative paucity of published academic research on the demand from consumers for such vehicles, and this small literature has been almost entirely US-based. This paper, which reports work funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council, represents the first study of its kind in the UK. Two stated preference experiments based on households' purchase choices between conventional vehicles and alternative-fuel vehicles were conducted. The data were analysed using various state-of-the-art formulations of logit models including error components logit and random parameters logit. Elasticities derived from the preferred models show that demand for alternative-fuel vehicles is much more sensitive to purchase price than demand for conventional vehicles, although the operating cost elasticities are more in line with existing evidence. It is concluded that alternative-fuel vehicles are unlikely to achieve a significant market share without non-marginal technological and/ or legislative/ fiscal developments to encourage their take-up. (A)","PeriodicalId":44910,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transport Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"1000-1023"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"72","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transport Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/16901","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

Abstract

Concerns regarding the environmental impacts of petrol and diesel cars have stimulated the development of vehicle technologies based on alternative fuels. In contrast to the scientific research which has led to these significant technological developments, there has been a relative paucity of published academic research on the demand from consumers for such vehicles, and this small literature has been almost entirely US-based. This paper, which reports work funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council, represents the first study of its kind in the UK. Two stated preference experiments based on households' purchase choices between conventional vehicles and alternative-fuel vehicles were conducted. The data were analysed using various state-of-the-art formulations of logit models including error components logit and random parameters logit. Elasticities derived from the preferred models show that demand for alternative-fuel vehicles is much more sensitive to purchase price than demand for conventional vehicles, although the operating cost elasticities are more in line with existing evidence. It is concluded that alternative-fuel vehicles are unlikely to achieve a significant market share without non-marginal technological and/ or legislative/ fiscal developments to encourage their take-up. (A)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国家庭替代燃料汽车需求的混合logit模型。
对汽油和柴油汽车对环境的影响的关注刺激了基于替代燃料的汽车技术的发展。与导致这些重大技术发展的科学研究相比,发表的关于消费者对此类车辆需求的学术研究相对较少,而且这些小文献几乎完全是基于美国的。这篇论文报告了由英国经济和社会研究委员会资助的工作,代表了英国同类研究的第一项研究。基于家庭在传统汽车和替代燃料汽车之间的购买选择,进行了两个陈述偏好实验。使用各种最先进的logit模型公式分析数据,包括误差分量logit和随机参数logit。优选模型的弹性表明,尽管运营成本弹性更符合现有证据,但替代燃料汽车的需求对购买价格的敏感性远高于传统汽车的需求。结论是,如果没有非边际技术和/或立法/财政方面的发展来鼓励使用替代燃料汽车,它们不可能取得很大的市场份额。(一)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
E-Commerce and the Last Mile in Urban Goods Distribution: Criticalities and the Need for Change Can process and lean thinking optimize order picking performance Combined optimization methodology for operational planning and service policies: a case study of urban ropeway transport An Analysis of Inverse of Airport Choice Leakage in China Multi-Airport Regions Statistical analysis of Texas state highways' cost indices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1