Evaluation of the dose-response for electrostimulation with Aussie current in the core strength

Andressa Bonito Lopes, Dhebora Espindola Amboni, Marilis Macedo Schmidel, Miriélly Junges Maciel, A. R. de Carvalho, G. Bertolini
{"title":"Evaluation of the dose-response for electrostimulation with Aussie current in the core strength","authors":"Andressa Bonito Lopes, Dhebora Espindola Amboni, Marilis Macedo Schmidel, Miriélly Junges Maciel, A. R. de Carvalho, G. Bertolini","doi":"10.15584/ejcem.2020.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Muscle strengthening to improve joint stability is widely used in the rehabilitation process, and the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation is a useful tool, but the use of Aussie current still has little documentation about its effectiveness. Aim. To verify if there is a dose-response effect to Aussie current, both in the strength and in the static and dynamic stability of the deep pelvic lumbar muscles. Material and methods. 39 volunteers divided into four groups, one control and three electrostimulation with intensity variation, one with intensity at the contraction threshold (GT), another with intensity maintained at 20% more (G20), and another with intensity maintained at 30% more (G30) than the intensity at the contraction threshold. The intervention lasted four weeks, with three weekly sessions lasting 15 minutes. Initially and after the intervention period, the strength and stability of the deep muscles of the pelvic lumbar region were measured in a static and dynamic manner by a biofeedback pressure unit. Results. There was a significant increase of pressure under the lordoses in the pre- and post-evaluation moments, there were no differences in the evaluation of indirect force (dynamic stability), but there was an increase in the time for GT. The effect sizes presented advantages for the electrostimulated groups in static stability. Conclusion. The doses used did not promote significant statistical differences, but the effects were positive for the electrostimulated groups, especially with respect to static stability.","PeriodicalId":15378,"journal":{"name":"临床和实验医学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床和实验医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2020.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Muscle strengthening to improve joint stability is widely used in the rehabilitation process, and the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation is a useful tool, but the use of Aussie current still has little documentation about its effectiveness. Aim. To verify if there is a dose-response effect to Aussie current, both in the strength and in the static and dynamic stability of the deep pelvic lumbar muscles. Material and methods. 39 volunteers divided into four groups, one control and three electrostimulation with intensity variation, one with intensity at the contraction threshold (GT), another with intensity maintained at 20% more (G20), and another with intensity maintained at 30% more (G30) than the intensity at the contraction threshold. The intervention lasted four weeks, with three weekly sessions lasting 15 minutes. Initially and after the intervention period, the strength and stability of the deep muscles of the pelvic lumbar region were measured in a static and dynamic manner by a biofeedback pressure unit. Results. There was a significant increase of pressure under the lordoses in the pre- and post-evaluation moments, there were no differences in the evaluation of indirect force (dynamic stability), but there was an increase in the time for GT. The effect sizes presented advantages for the electrostimulated groups in static stability. Conclusion. The doses used did not promote significant statistical differences, but the effects were positive for the electrostimulated groups, especially with respect to static stability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳洲电流电刺激对核心强度的剂量反应评估
介绍。肌肉强化以提高关节稳定性在康复过程中被广泛使用,神经肌肉电刺激是一种有用的工具,但使用澳氏电流仍然很少有关于其有效性的文献。的目标。为了验证澳大利亚电流是否存在剂量反应效应,无论是在强度方面还是在骨盆深腰肌的静态和动态稳定性方面。材料和方法。39名志愿者被分为四组,一组为对照组,三组为强度变化电刺激组,一组为收缩阈值强度(GT),另一组为比收缩阈值强度高20% (G20),另一组为比收缩阈值强度高30% (G30)。干预持续四周,每周三次,每次15分钟。干预期开始和结束后,通过生物反馈压力装置以静态和动态方式测量骨盆腰椎区深部肌肉的强度和稳定性。结果。在评估前后,电刺激组的压力显著增加,间接力(动态稳定性)的评估没有差异,但GT的评估时间有所增加。在静态稳定性方面,效应量表现出电刺激组的优势。结论。使用的剂量并没有促进显著的统计学差异,但对电刺激组的影响是积极的,特别是在静态稳定性方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18331
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Low generation polyamidoamine dendrimers (PAMAM) and biotin-PAMAM conjugate – the detailed structural studies by 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy Membrane lipids under norm and pathology Fibromatosis-like spindle-cell metaplastic carcinoma of the breast – a case report Primary breast angiosarcoma – a case report An aggressive locoregional orbital rhabdomyosarcoma and Li Fraumeni syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1