{"title":"Home visitation: A South African process evaluation","authors":"W. Odendaal, S. Atkins, A. Niekerk, M. Seedat","doi":"10.4314/ASP.V2I2.31607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Home visitation programmes (HVPs) are a moderately effective mechanism for promoting childhood \nhealth and, recently, childhood safety. This paper presents the findings of a process evaluation of an \nHVP focusing on the prevention of childhood unintentional injuries that was implemented in 45 \nhouseholds in four low-income communities in Johannesburg and Cape Town. The aim of the \nevaluation was to contribute to an understanding of the processes that underpin effective home \nvisitation. A combination of qualitative methods was utilised, namely, individual interviews, focus group \ndiscussions and a review of project documentation. The results provide insights into the many \npotential confounders that can impact on home visitation, such as recipient suspicion, visitor morale \nand individualised interpretations of protocols across sites. Process evaluations such as this one are \ninvaluable to the contextualisation of an intervention and the identification of best practices.","PeriodicalId":41085,"journal":{"name":"African Safety Promotion","volume":"69 1","pages":"15-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Safety Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ASP.V2I2.31607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Home visitation programmes (HVPs) are a moderately effective mechanism for promoting childhood
health and, recently, childhood safety. This paper presents the findings of a process evaluation of an
HVP focusing on the prevention of childhood unintentional injuries that was implemented in 45
households in four low-income communities in Johannesburg and Cape Town. The aim of the
evaluation was to contribute to an understanding of the processes that underpin effective home
visitation. A combination of qualitative methods was utilised, namely, individual interviews, focus group
discussions and a review of project documentation. The results provide insights into the many
potential confounders that can impact on home visitation, such as recipient suspicion, visitor morale
and individualised interpretations of protocols across sites. Process evaluations such as this one are
invaluable to the contextualisation of an intervention and the identification of best practices.