Anticipatory Futures: Framing the Socio-technical Visions of Online Ratings and Reviews in Wired

IF 1.5 3区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Culture & Critique Pub Date : 2021-01-18 DOI:10.1093/CCC/TCAA034
Ngai Keung Chan
{"title":"Anticipatory Futures: Framing the Socio-technical Visions of Online Ratings and Reviews in Wired","authors":"Ngai Keung Chan","doi":"10.1093/CCC/TCAA034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Drawing insights from the sociology of expectations and recent studies on future visions in communication studies, this article traces and analyzes how Wired—a technology news provider and socio-technical vanguard whose vision is to uncover technological innovations—anticipated socio-technical visions of online ratings and reviews over two decades (1998–2018). The qualitative textual analysis of Wired’s coverage revealed two socio-technical visions, namely, promissory futures and problematic futures. The former embraced neoliberal discourses of consumer empowerment and accountability, whereas the latter entailed a pessimistic evaluation of the manipulation of online ratings and the potential of adopting online ratings beyond e-commerce platforms. The visions represented in Wired largely followed the logic of “technological solutionism.” This study affords opportunities for thinking about the role of popular media discourses and temporalities in shaping imagined futures of emerging technologies.","PeriodicalId":54193,"journal":{"name":"Communication Culture & Critique","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Culture & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CCC/TCAA034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Drawing insights from the sociology of expectations and recent studies on future visions in communication studies, this article traces and analyzes how Wired—a technology news provider and socio-technical vanguard whose vision is to uncover technological innovations—anticipated socio-technical visions of online ratings and reviews over two decades (1998–2018). The qualitative textual analysis of Wired’s coverage revealed two socio-technical visions, namely, promissory futures and problematic futures. The former embraced neoliberal discourses of consumer empowerment and accountability, whereas the latter entailed a pessimistic evaluation of the manipulation of online ratings and the potential of adopting online ratings beyond e-commerce platforms. The visions represented in Wired largely followed the logic of “technological solutionism.” This study affords opportunities for thinking about the role of popular media discourses and temporalities in shaping imagined futures of emerging technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预期的未来:构建在线评级和评论的社会技术愿景
从期望社会学和最近对传播研究中未来愿景的研究中获得见解,本文追踪并分析了wired -一家技术新闻提供商和社会技术先锋,其愿景是揭示技术创新-如何预测20年来在线评级和评论的社会技术愿景(1998-2018)。对Wired报道的定性文本分析揭示了两种社会技术愿景,即期票未来和问题未来。前者接受了消费者赋权和问责制的新自由主义话语,而后者则对在线评级的操纵以及在电子商务平台之外采用在线评级的潜力进行了悲观的评估。《连线》杂志所呈现的愿景很大程度上遵循了“技术解决方案主义”的逻辑。这项研究为思考大众媒体话语和暂时性在塑造新兴技术的想象未来中的作用提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: CCC provides an international forum for critical research in communication, media, and cultural studies. We welcome high-quality research and analyses that place questions of power, inequality, and justice at the center of empirical and theoretical inquiry. CCC seeks to bring a diversity of critical approaches (political economy, feminist analysis, critical race theory, postcolonial critique, cultural studies, queer theory) to bear on the role of communication, media, and culture in power dynamics on a global scale. CCC is especially interested in critical scholarship that engages with emerging lines of inquiry across the humanities and social sciences. We seek to explore the place of mediated communication in current topics of theorization and cross-disciplinary research (including affect, branding, posthumanism, labor, temporality, ordinariness, and networked everyday life, to name just a few examples). In the coming years, we anticipate publishing special issues on these themes.
期刊最新文献
Cartography of Afro-Asian relations in America: co-racialization and nanohealing Not just platform, nor cooperatives: worker-owned technologies from below When mass culture meets high culture: reality television and big data at the art museum Afrofemtrism: a critical examination of the relationship between gender, technology, and society Kū Kia‘i Kahuku: indigenizing social media, civic streaming, and sociospatial symmetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1