Assessment of Corruption Level as a Component of Governance Indicator: International Experience and Russian Practices

E. Bakhtairova, Alexandra Anganova
{"title":"Assessment of Corruption Level as a Component of Governance Indicator: International Experience and Russian Practices","authors":"E. Bakhtairova, Alexandra Anganova","doi":"10.17150/2411-6262.2021.12(4).15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As corruptions is one of the most important problems in most modern states, its assessment forms an important part of integral governance indicator. Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI), a technique, worked out by The World Bank, is widely used in the international level. Since 2019 the technique “Methodology of Conducting Sociological Surveys for Corruption Assessment in the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation” (further in the text — Methodology of the Russian Federation Government), adopted by the Government Decree of the Russian Federation, is used in the national level. The main purpose of the present research is to evaluate how the national methodology of corruption assessment reflects the quality of governance in this sphere. The research focuses on the main techniques for corruption assessment in different levels. The study analyses the main scientific statements for corruption assessment as a component of integral quality indicator of governance. Secondary data of corruption survey’s findings formed the information and empirical base of the research. The novelty of the study is in developing original author’s approach towards methodological aspects of comprehensive governance assessment. It was found that the national methodology is an alternative approach, characterizing the quality of governance in this sphere. The research revealed several drawbacks of the indicative methodology issued by the World Bank. The Methodology of the Russian Federation Government more appropriately reflects the corruption level and more accurately characterizes the governance quality in the sphere of fighting corruption in the regions of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":8692,"journal":{"name":"Baikal Research Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baikal Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6262.2021.12(4).15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As corruptions is one of the most important problems in most modern states, its assessment forms an important part of integral governance indicator. Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI), a technique, worked out by The World Bank, is widely used in the international level. Since 2019 the technique “Methodology of Conducting Sociological Surveys for Corruption Assessment in the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation” (further in the text — Methodology of the Russian Federation Government), adopted by the Government Decree of the Russian Federation, is used in the national level. The main purpose of the present research is to evaluate how the national methodology of corruption assessment reflects the quality of governance in this sphere. The research focuses on the main techniques for corruption assessment in different levels. The study analyses the main scientific statements for corruption assessment as a component of integral quality indicator of governance. Secondary data of corruption survey’s findings formed the information and empirical base of the research. The novelty of the study is in developing original author’s approach towards methodological aspects of comprehensive governance assessment. It was found that the national methodology is an alternative approach, characterizing the quality of governance in this sphere. The research revealed several drawbacks of the indicative methodology issued by the World Bank. The Methodology of the Russian Federation Government more appropriately reflects the corruption level and more accurately characterizes the governance quality in the sphere of fighting corruption in the regions of the Russian Federation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为治理指标组成部分的腐败程度评估:国际经验和俄罗斯做法
腐败是大多数现代国家最重要的问题之一,其评估是整体治理指标的重要组成部分。世界治理指标(WGI)是世界银行制定的一项技术,在国际上得到了广泛的应用。自2019年以来,俄罗斯联邦政府令通过的“在俄罗斯联邦组成实体进行腐败评估的社会学调查方法”技术(详见文本-俄罗斯联邦政府的方法)在国家一级使用。本研究的主要目的是评估国家评估腐败的方法如何反映这一领域的治理质量。重点研究了不同层次的腐败评估的主要技术。本文分析了将腐败评估作为治理整体质量指标的主要科学表述。腐败调查结果的二次数据构成了本研究的信息和实证基础。该研究的新颖之处在于将原作者的方法发展到综合治理评估的方法论方面。人们发现,国家方法是另一种办法,可以说明这一领域的管理质量。这项研究揭示了世界银行发布的指示性方法的几个缺点。俄罗斯联邦政府的方法更恰当地反映了腐败程度,更准确地描述了俄罗斯联邦各地区在反腐败领域的治理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
NP-Difficult Tasks: Automatic Proof of Theorems and Turings Machine Harnessing the Irkutsk Oblast Recreational Potential for the Innovation-Driven Growth the Region Improvement of the Adaptive Properties of the National Financial Market to Respond the Globalization Risks On the Frequency of Monitoring and Updating a Company's Strategic Business Development Plans Meaning of Life Crisis and Self-Attitude of Fetishistic Transvestites (Internet Research)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1