‘Integration is not a one-way process’: students negotiating meanings of integration and internationalization at home (IaH) in Finnish higher education

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Higher Education Research & Development Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI:10.1080/07294360.2023.2193731
C. Mendoza, Fred Dervin, Heidi Layne
{"title":"‘Integration is not a one-way process’: students negotiating meanings of integration and internationalization at home (IaH) in Finnish higher education","authors":"C. Mendoza, Fred Dervin, Heidi Layne","doi":"10.1080/07294360.2023.2193731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Internationalization at home (IaH) policies in higher education institutions (HEIs) are rarely negotiated with and by students. Therefore, students’ takes on such policies could be missed opportunities for HEIs. This qualitative study investigates international and local students’ negotiations and meaning-making of integration and IaH as stated by institutional policies. The data consist of online forum entries and reports from small group discussions between 40 students in English medium master’s programs in Finland (Europe). The key concepts of ideology and imaginary serve as entries into data analysis, which consists of enunciative discourse analysis. The findings indicate a perceived hierarchy of mutual but not equal integration between university staff, local and international students. Furthermore, the categories of ‘international as guests’ and ‘local students as hosts’ are challenged by the participants. Local students are considered as ‘guests with more privilege’ and international students as ‘guests with less opportunities’. The responsibility to achieve IaH goals is perceived to be unequally distributed among these actors. Practical implications include reconsidering the categories of ‘international’ and ‘local’ students and how IaH policies could share the responsibilities to achieve their goals more equally among students and staff.","PeriodicalId":48219,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Research & Development","volume":"20 1","pages":"1150 - 1164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2193731","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Internationalization at home (IaH) policies in higher education institutions (HEIs) are rarely negotiated with and by students. Therefore, students’ takes on such policies could be missed opportunities for HEIs. This qualitative study investigates international and local students’ negotiations and meaning-making of integration and IaH as stated by institutional policies. The data consist of online forum entries and reports from small group discussions between 40 students in English medium master’s programs in Finland (Europe). The key concepts of ideology and imaginary serve as entries into data analysis, which consists of enunciative discourse analysis. The findings indicate a perceived hierarchy of mutual but not equal integration between university staff, local and international students. Furthermore, the categories of ‘international as guests’ and ‘local students as hosts’ are challenged by the participants. Local students are considered as ‘guests with more privilege’ and international students as ‘guests with less opportunities’. The responsibility to achieve IaH goals is perceived to be unequally distributed among these actors. Practical implications include reconsidering the categories of ‘international’ and ‘local’ students and how IaH policies could share the responsibilities to achieve their goals more equally among students and staff.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“整合不是一个单向的过程”:学生们在芬兰高等教育中讨论整合和国际化的意义
高等教育机构(HEIs)的国内国际化(IaH)政策很少与学生协商或由学生协商。因此,学生对这些政策的接受可能会使高等教育机构错失机会。本质性研究调查了国际学生和本地学生对学校政策所规定的整合和IaH的谈判和意义建构。数据包括芬兰(欧洲)40名英语硕士课程学生的在线论坛条目和小组讨论报告。意识形态和想象这两个关键概念是数据分析的入口,数据分析包括阐述性话语分析。调查结果表明,大学员工、本地学生和国际学生之间存在着相互但不平等的融合等级。此外,“国际作为客人”和“本地学生作为主人”的分类也受到了参与者的挑战。本地学生被视为“享有更多特权的客人”,而国际学生被视为“机会较少的客人”。实现独立评估目标的责任被认为在这些行动者之间分配不均。实际影响包括重新考虑“国际学生”和“本地学生”的类别,以及如何在学生和教职员工之间更公平地分担责任,以实现其目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education Research & Development
Higher Education Research & Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Intentions versus outcomes in doctoral degree completion Using crowdfunding as a source of research funding: challenges and required competences Students’ informal learning interactions in health professions education: insights from a qualitative synthesis Including LGBTQ+ early career higher education staff: learning from the policy and practice for supporting LGBTQ+ students Professional adaptation of international academics: a critical discussion through the lens of complexity theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1