Judgment Creditors, Resulting Trusts, and the Matrimonial Home

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW American Bankruptcy Law Journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3546959
P. Spiro
{"title":"Judgment Creditors, Resulting Trusts, and the Matrimonial Home","authors":"P. Spiro","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3546959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One often finds that a person in business puts the title to the family home only in the name of the other spouse, rather than holding it in joint title. The hope is that the house will remain safe from his creditors if he cannot pay his business debts. This can backfire for a variety of reasons, particularly if the spouses later separate. One situation in which it will fail to provide protection is when unpaid debts were already looming at the time the transfer occurred. If such a transfer of ownership is done with the intent of defeating creditors, it can be deemed to be a fraudulent conveyance and set aside by a court as void against creditors. Putting the house in only one name does sometimes offer protection, but it should be approached with careful planning.","PeriodicalId":44862,"journal":{"name":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3546959","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One often finds that a person in business puts the title to the family home only in the name of the other spouse, rather than holding it in joint title. The hope is that the house will remain safe from his creditors if he cannot pay his business debts. This can backfire for a variety of reasons, particularly if the spouses later separate. One situation in which it will fail to provide protection is when unpaid debts were already looming at the time the transfer occurred. If such a transfer of ownership is done with the intent of defeating creditors, it can be deemed to be a fraudulent conveyance and set aside by a court as void against creditors. Putting the house in only one name does sometimes offer protection, but it should be approached with careful planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
判决债权人,结果信托,和婚姻之家
人们经常发现,做生意的人把家庭房屋的所有权只放在另一方配偶的名下,而不是以共同所有权的形式持有。他的希望是,如果他无法偿还商业债务,他的房子将不会受到债权人的威胁。由于各种原因,这可能会适得其反,尤其是如果夫妻俩后来分开了。它无法提供保护的一种情况是,在转移发生时,未偿债务已经迫在眉睫。如果这种所有权转让的目的是击败债权人,它可以被视为欺诈性转让,并由法院宣布对债权人无效。把房子只放在一个名字上有时确实能提供保护,但应该仔细规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Steering Loan Modifications Post-Pandemic Passing the Parcel? Relationship Banking at the Onset of Financial Distress Treatment of Disputed Claims in Corporate Insolvency: Evolving Jurisprudence Paper Series VII - Arrangements and Compromise Government Activism in Bankruptcy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1