Effect of Three Different Sitting Postures on Disability in Diamond Workers - A Cross Sectional Study

H. Patel, Umer Arfath, A. Ranganathan
{"title":"Effect of Three Different Sitting Postures on Disability in Diamond Workers - A Cross Sectional Study","authors":"H. Patel, Umer Arfath, A. Ranganathan","doi":"10.5455/JEOS.20150613011132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Diamond making industries are one of the widespread industries of Gujarat and Maharashtra. According to their nature of work, large number of diamond workers acquires different sitting position. We analyzed three different sitting positions depends upon their need in the profession. Thus in this study, we want to analyze the area specific symptoms according to the working posture and their impact on function. Materials and Methods: In this cross- sectional study, 754 diamond workers aged between 30 and 60 years were selected through quota sampling from Visnagar, Gujarat, India. The subjects were allocated in 3 × 3 factor grouping design, i.e., three age groups and 3 sitting postures. The age grouping variables were 30-39, 40-49, and 50-60 years. Grouping variable for posture were, without back supported sitting, back supported sitting and tailor sitting. Analysis of posture related disability was done by the standardized Nordic questionnaire and other four area-specific questionnaires such as neck disability index, revised oswestry disability index, disability arm shoulder and hand, and lower extremity functional scale. Results: Descriptive analysis was done using MS Excel 2007 to analyze the data. Results revealed that without back support group had highest disability across all three groups amounting to 48.82%, followed by the back supported group with 32.12%. Interestingly tailor sitting position groups accounting for least disability with 29.86%. Conclusion: Without back supported sitting was the worst posture attained during work. Tailor sitting revealed the lesser amount of disability when compared to both with or without back supported sitting for the diamond workers.","PeriodicalId":16086,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science","volume":"25 1","pages":"96-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JEOS.20150613011132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: Diamond making industries are one of the widespread industries of Gujarat and Maharashtra. According to their nature of work, large number of diamond workers acquires different sitting position. We analyzed three different sitting positions depends upon their need in the profession. Thus in this study, we want to analyze the area specific symptoms according to the working posture and their impact on function. Materials and Methods: In this cross- sectional study, 754 diamond workers aged between 30 and 60 years were selected through quota sampling from Visnagar, Gujarat, India. The subjects were allocated in 3 × 3 factor grouping design, i.e., three age groups and 3 sitting postures. The age grouping variables were 30-39, 40-49, and 50-60 years. Grouping variable for posture were, without back supported sitting, back supported sitting and tailor sitting. Analysis of posture related disability was done by the standardized Nordic questionnaire and other four area-specific questionnaires such as neck disability index, revised oswestry disability index, disability arm shoulder and hand, and lower extremity functional scale. Results: Descriptive analysis was done using MS Excel 2007 to analyze the data. Results revealed that without back support group had highest disability across all three groups amounting to 48.82%, followed by the back supported group with 32.12%. Interestingly tailor sitting position groups accounting for least disability with 29.86%. Conclusion: Without back supported sitting was the worst posture attained during work. Tailor sitting revealed the lesser amount of disability when compared to both with or without back supported sitting for the diamond workers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种不同坐姿对钻石工人残疾影响的横断面研究
目的:钻石制造行业是古吉拉特邦和马哈拉施特拉邦的广泛行业之一。根据他们的工作性质,大量钻石工人获得不同的坐姿。我们根据职业需求分析了三种不同的坐姿。因此,在本研究中,我们想根据工作姿势分析区域特异性症状及其对功能的影响。材料与方法:在这项横断面研究中,通过配额抽样,从印度古吉拉特邦的维斯纳加尔选择了754名年龄在30至60岁之间的钻石工人。受试者采用3 × 3因子分组设计,即3个年龄组和3种坐姿。年龄分组变量为30-39岁、40-49岁和50-60岁。体位分组变量为无背支撑坐姿、背支撑坐姿和贴身坐姿。采用标准化北欧问卷和颈部残疾指数、修订后的体态残疾指数、手臂、肩和手残疾、下肢功能量表等4个区域调查问卷对体态相关残疾进行分析。结果:采用MS Excel 2007对数据进行描述性分析。结果显示,无背部支持组的残疾程度最高,为48.82%,其次是背部支持组,为32.12%。有趣的是,裁缝坐姿组的残疾比例最低,为29.86%。结论:无背支撑的坐姿是工作中最差的坐姿。对于钻石工人来说,与有无背部支撑的坐姿相比,量身定制的坐姿显示出更少的残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling and Analyzing for Thermal Protection of Firefighters' Glove by Phase Change Material. Challenges in implementing of school-based recruitment for human biomonitoring research Occupational Exposure to Mercury in Dental Professionals Performing Mercury Dental Amalgam Restoration Removal Procedures: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Air Quality Risk Assessment Model Supported by In-Vitro Results Nesting materials may cause pneumonia-like findings in Sprague Dawley rats Screening of Selected Vegetables from Wudil, Farmlands In Kano State, Nigeria for Organophosphorus and Organochlorine Pesticide Residues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1