Does it hurt to ask? An analysis of iatrogenic risk during suicide risk assessment

Theodore W. Bender , Skye Fitzpatrick , Marco-Antonio Hartmann , Jennifer Hames , Lindsay Bodell , Edward A. Selby , Thomas E. Joiner Jr.
{"title":"Does it hurt to ask? An analysis of iatrogenic risk during suicide risk assessment","authors":"Theodore W. Bender ,&nbsp;Skye Fitzpatrick ,&nbsp;Marco-Antonio Hartmann ,&nbsp;Jennifer Hames ,&nbsp;Lindsay Bodell ,&nbsp;Edward A. Selby ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Joiner Jr.","doi":"10.1016/j.npbr.2019.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There remains concern regarding whether suicide risk screening is harmful despite literature suggesting that it is not. The present study aimed to replicate and extend literature demonstrating that suicide risk assessment does not influence immediate or persistent distress, and examine its impact on implicit suicidality. Further, it examined whether having a suicide attempt history, higher depression symptoms, and high alcohol use yielded a beneficial effect of suicide risk assessment on distress and implicit suicidality.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Undergraduates (N = 147) were randomized to undergo suicide risk assessment or not. Distress was measured before and after survey/interviews, and again two days later along with implicit suicidality via <em>The Suicide Implicit Association Task</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The two groups did not differ in immediate or persistent distress, nor implicit suicidality. Individuals with high alcohol use comparable exhibited less immediate distress reduction following suicide risk assessment than those with low alcohol use, but comparable reductions in persistent distress. Those with a suicide attempt history who underwent suicide risk assessment exhibited lower levels of implicit suicidality than those who did not, but suicide risk assessment did not influence implicit sucidality for those without an attempt history.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>This study is limited by its small predominantly Caucasian and college sample, with a low base rate of suicidal behavior.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings add to a literature suggesting that suicide risk assessment may not be iatrogenic, even implicitly, and may be beneficial for those with a suicide attempt history. Clinicians are urged to continue suicide risk assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49756,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.npbr.2019.07.005","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0941950019300648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background

There remains concern regarding whether suicide risk screening is harmful despite literature suggesting that it is not. The present study aimed to replicate and extend literature demonstrating that suicide risk assessment does not influence immediate or persistent distress, and examine its impact on implicit suicidality. Further, it examined whether having a suicide attempt history, higher depression symptoms, and high alcohol use yielded a beneficial effect of suicide risk assessment on distress and implicit suicidality.

Methods

Undergraduates (N = 147) were randomized to undergo suicide risk assessment or not. Distress was measured before and after survey/interviews, and again two days later along with implicit suicidality via The Suicide Implicit Association Task.

Results

The two groups did not differ in immediate or persistent distress, nor implicit suicidality. Individuals with high alcohol use comparable exhibited less immediate distress reduction following suicide risk assessment than those with low alcohol use, but comparable reductions in persistent distress. Those with a suicide attempt history who underwent suicide risk assessment exhibited lower levels of implicit suicidality than those who did not, but suicide risk assessment did not influence implicit sucidality for those without an attempt history.

Limitations

This study is limited by its small predominantly Caucasian and college sample, with a low base rate of suicidal behavior.

Conclusions

These findings add to a literature suggesting that suicide risk assessment may not be iatrogenic, even implicitly, and may be beneficial for those with a suicide attempt history. Clinicians are urged to continue suicide risk assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
问一下会有伤害吗?自杀风险评估中的医源性风险分析
关于自杀风险筛查是否有害的问题仍然存在,尽管文献表明并非如此。本研究旨在复制和扩展文献,证明自杀风险评估不影响即时或持续的痛苦,并检查其对内隐自杀的影响。此外,该研究还研究了自杀未遂史、较高的抑郁症状和大量饮酒是否会对自杀风险评估产生有益的影响。方法将大学生(N = 147)随机分为是否进行自杀风险评估两组。在调查/访谈前后,以及两天后通过自杀内隐联想任务测量抑郁和内隐自杀。结果两组在即时或持续性痛苦以及隐性自杀倾向方面没有差异。高酒精使用的个体在自杀风险评估后表现出比低酒精使用的个体更少的即时痛苦减轻,但持续痛苦的减少是可比的。那些有自杀企图史的人比那些没有自杀企图史的人表现出更低的内隐自杀水平,但自杀风险评估对没有自杀企图史的人的内隐自杀没有影响。局限性:这项研究的样本主要是白人和大学生,自杀行为的基础率很低。结论:这些发现进一步证明了自杀风险评估可能不是医源性的,甚至是隐性的,并且可能对那些有自杀企图史的人有益。敦促临床医生继续进行自杀风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research publishes original papers and reviews in biological psychiatry, brain research, neurology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychoimmunology, psychopathology, psychotherapy. The journal has a focus on international and interdisciplinary basic research with clinical relevance. Translational research is particularly appreciated. Authors are allowed to submit their manuscript in their native language as supplemental data to the English version. Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research is related to the oldest German speaking journal in this field, the Centralblatt fur Nervenheilkunde, Psychiatrie und gerichtliche Psychopathologie, founded in 1878. The tradition and idea of previous famous editors (Alois Alzheimer and Kurt Schneider among others) was continued in modernized form with Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research. Centralblatt was a journal of broad scope and relevance, now Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research represents a journal with translational and interdisciplinary perspective, focusing on clinically oriented research in psychiatry, neurology and neighboring fields of neurosciences and psychology/psychotherapy with a preference for biologically oriented research including basic research. Preference is given for papers from newly emerging fields, like clinical psychoimmunology/neuroimmunology, and ideas.
期刊最新文献
Seizure and COVID-19: Association and review of potential mechanism Mental health research in the lower-middle-income countries of Africa and Asia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review Acute changes in cerebral blood flow after single-infusion ketamine in major depression: A pilot study Depression and its association with quality of life among elderly: An elderly home- cross sectional study Quality of Thai media reporting of suicidal behavior: Compliance against the World Health Organization media guidelines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1