Lipoprotein (a) Status and Effect of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on it in Bangladeshi Patients with Cholelithiasis

Giasuddin Asm, K. A. Jhuma, A. Choudhury, Mujibul Haq Am
{"title":"Lipoprotein (a) Status and Effect of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on it in Bangladeshi Patients with Cholelithiasis","authors":"Giasuddin Asm, K. A. Jhuma, A. Choudhury, Mujibul Haq Am","doi":"10.4172/2167-0943.1000216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Although it was reported that cholecystectomy had complex impact on lipid profile in cholelithiasis, \n lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] was not studied. The present study was therefore conducted on serum Lp(a) status in \n Bangladeshi patients with cholelithiasis and effect of cholecystectomy on it. Patients and Methods: Adult patients (n=44) with cholelithiasis and 30 normal controls (NC) were included in the \n study. The blood sample was taken from fasting patients before cholecystectomy (Serum-I0), gall bladder bile \n sample during cholecystectomy (Bile-I0) and blood sample again after 2-3 months at follow-up (Serum-II0) and from \n fasting NC subjects. Lp(a) level was quantitated in serum and bile by immunoturbidimetric method using \n commercially available research kit. The results were compared statistically by ANOVA, Student’s t-test and Chisquared \n test using SPSS programme. Results: The Lp(a) status (mg/dl, Mean ± SD) in controls and patients and their statistical analysis revealed that \n Lp(a) was much higher in patients compared to controls (NC: 29.07 ± 14.1, Patients Serum-I0: 290.84 ± 110.93, \n Patients Bile-I0 : 37.12 ± 28.61, Patients Serum-II0: 203.70 ± 90.13) (P<0.001). Lp(a) was lowered after \n cholecystectomy, but remained elevated in patients Serum-II0 compared to NC significantly (P<0.001). No significant \n difference was observed for Lp(a) levels between NC and patients Bile-I0 (P=0.173). The proportions of patients for \n Serum-I0, Bile-I0 and Serum-II0 with Lp(a) levels above and within normal limits and their statistical analyses showed \n significant associations (P<0.001). \n Conclusions: Cholelithiasis had complex impact on Lp(a) status indicating a special function of gall bladder \n relevant to its metabolism. Further studies are warranted.","PeriodicalId":16452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic syndrome","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0943.1000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: Although it was reported that cholecystectomy had complex impact on lipid profile in cholelithiasis, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] was not studied. The present study was therefore conducted on serum Lp(a) status in Bangladeshi patients with cholelithiasis and effect of cholecystectomy on it. Patients and Methods: Adult patients (n=44) with cholelithiasis and 30 normal controls (NC) were included in the study. The blood sample was taken from fasting patients before cholecystectomy (Serum-I0), gall bladder bile sample during cholecystectomy (Bile-I0) and blood sample again after 2-3 months at follow-up (Serum-II0) and from fasting NC subjects. Lp(a) level was quantitated in serum and bile by immunoturbidimetric method using commercially available research kit. The results were compared statistically by ANOVA, Student’s t-test and Chisquared test using SPSS programme. Results: The Lp(a) status (mg/dl, Mean ± SD) in controls and patients and their statistical analysis revealed that Lp(a) was much higher in patients compared to controls (NC: 29.07 ± 14.1, Patients Serum-I0: 290.84 ± 110.93, Patients Bile-I0 : 37.12 ± 28.61, Patients Serum-II0: 203.70 ± 90.13) (P<0.001). Lp(a) was lowered after cholecystectomy, but remained elevated in patients Serum-II0 compared to NC significantly (P<0.001). No significant difference was observed for Lp(a) levels between NC and patients Bile-I0 (P=0.173). The proportions of patients for Serum-I0, Bile-I0 and Serum-II0 with Lp(a) levels above and within normal limits and their statistical analyses showed significant associations (P<0.001). Conclusions: Cholelithiasis had complex impact on Lp(a) status indicating a special function of gall bladder relevant to its metabolism. Further studies are warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂蛋白(a)孟加拉国胆石症患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术对其状况及影响
目的:虽然有报道称胆囊切除术对胆石症患者的脂质谱有复杂的影响,但没有对脂蛋白(a) [Lp(a)]进行研究。因此,本研究对孟加拉国胆石症患者的血清Lp(a)水平和胆囊切除术对其的影响进行了研究。患者与方法:选取44例成年胆石症患者和30例正常对照(NC)。取胆囊切除术前空腹患者的血样(血清- i0)、胆囊切除术期间的胆囊胆汁样本(胆汁- i0)和随访2-3个月后再次采集的血样(血清- ii0)以及空腹NC受试者的血样。采用市售试剂盒,用免疫比浊法测定血清和胆汁中Lp(a)水平。使用SPSS程序对结果进行方差分析、学生t检验和chisqusquared检验。结果:对照组和患者的Lp(a)水平(mg/dl, Mean±SD)及其统计学分析显示,患者的Lp(a)水平(NC: 29.07±14.1,患者血清- i0: 290.84±110.93,患者胆汁- i0: 37.12±28.61,患者血清- i0: 203.70±90.13)明显高于对照组(P<0.001)。胆囊切除术后Lp(a)降低,但与NC相比,血清ii0患者的Lp(a)仍显著升高(P<0.001)。NC患者与Bile-I0患者Lp(a)水平无显著差异(P=0.173)。血清- i0、胆汁- i0和血清- ii0中Lp(a)水平高于和在正常范围内的患者比例及其统计学分析显示有显著相关性(P<0.001)。结论:胆石症对Lp(a)状态有复杂的影响,提示胆囊具有与其代谢相关的特殊功能。进一步的研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Vitamin D Status withMetabolic Syndrome and itsComponents in Bangladeshi UrbanWomen The effects of a combined aerobic and resistance exercise programme on insulin resistance among prediabetes subjects The effects of (a combined exercise programme aerobic and resistance) on blood glucose and incretin hormone that could control the diabetes in type 2 diabetes. Acute renal failure due to anabolic steroid or creatinine supplement COX-2 Expression in the Aorta of Obese Zucker Rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1