Flat-Smacked! Converting to Flat Eartherism

IF 0.9 0 RELIGION Journal of Media and Religion Pub Date : 2020-02-25 DOI:10.1080/15348423.2020.1774257
A. Olshansky, R. M. Peaslee, A. Landrum
{"title":"Flat-Smacked! Converting to Flat Eartherism","authors":"A. Olshansky, R. M. Peaslee, A. Landrum","doi":"10.1080/15348423.2020.1774257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Flat Earth movement appears to have emerged from a combination of Biblical literalism (e.g., young Earth creationism, geocentrism) and conspiracy theorizing (e.g., belief that NASA faked the moon landings). Interviews with participants of the first International Flat Earth Conference in 2017 revealed that the majority of Flat Earthers have come to endorse Flat Earth ideas only within the last few years after watching videos on YouTube. However, the novelty of the movement means that there is a lack of literature on this group, including what exactly convinced these new Flat Earthers and how that conversion took place. Here, we provide evidence for a gradual process of conversion after multiple exposures to Flat Earth YouTube videos to which viewers were initially skeptical but report failing to adequately debunk. Furthermore, evidence is presented here regarding the crucial role YouTube played in their conversion process, suggesting the platform is potentially a strong avenue for changing beliefs. The narratives provided here also support much of the research on conversion, describing a gradual process of deep personal change, via the relatively new mechanism of social media, where one finds a new center of concern, interest, and behavior, as well as a different view of reality.","PeriodicalId":55954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media and Religion","volume":"6 1","pages":"46 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2020.1774257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Flat Earth movement appears to have emerged from a combination of Biblical literalism (e.g., young Earth creationism, geocentrism) and conspiracy theorizing (e.g., belief that NASA faked the moon landings). Interviews with participants of the first International Flat Earth Conference in 2017 revealed that the majority of Flat Earthers have come to endorse Flat Earth ideas only within the last few years after watching videos on YouTube. However, the novelty of the movement means that there is a lack of literature on this group, including what exactly convinced these new Flat Earthers and how that conversion took place. Here, we provide evidence for a gradual process of conversion after multiple exposures to Flat Earth YouTube videos to which viewers were initially skeptical but report failing to adequately debunk. Furthermore, evidence is presented here regarding the crucial role YouTube played in their conversion process, suggesting the platform is potentially a strong avenue for changing beliefs. The narratives provided here also support much of the research on conversion, describing a gradual process of deep personal change, via the relatively new mechanism of social media, where one finds a new center of concern, interest, and behavior, as well as a different view of reality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flat-Smacked !转变为地球平说
地平论似乎是从圣经字面主义(例如,年轻地球神创论,地心说)和阴谋论(例如,相信美国宇航局伪造了登月)的结合中产生的。对2017年第一届国际地平论会议参与者的采访显示,大多数地平论者都是在最近几年看了YouTube上的视频后才开始支持地平论的。然而,这一运动的新颖性意味着缺乏关于这一群体的文献,包括究竟是什么说服了这些新的地平论者,以及这种转变是如何发生的。在这里,我们提供了证据,证明在多次观看YouTube上的“地球是平的”视频后,观众最初对这些视频持怀疑态度,但报告未能充分揭穿。此外,有证据表明YouTube在他们的转变过程中发挥了至关重要的作用,这表明该平台可能是改变信仰的有力途径。这里提供的叙述也支持了许多关于转换的研究,描述了一个深刻的个人变化的渐进过程,通过社交媒体的相对较新的机制,人们找到了一个新的关注、兴趣和行为中心,以及对现实的不同看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Still Fighting the God-Vs.-Gays Battle: Twitter Reaction to Presidential Candidate Pete Buttigieg’s Identification as a Gay Member of the Christian Left Tweeting for Religion: How Indonesian Islamic Fundamentalist Organizations Use Twitter Differences in Religious Framing of Muslims and Islam in American Media Coverage Before and After the Trump Campaign Faith Discourses in the Context of Racial Tension: Black Lives Matter and Its Counter-Narratives Digital Merit: A Case Study of a Chinese Buddhist Meditation Group on WeChat During the Early Outbreak of Covid-19 in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1