The Effect of Peri-Bracket Excess Adhesive on Shear Bond Strength and Enamel–Adhesive Interface Morphology With Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy: An In Vitro Comparative Study

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Oral Research Pub Date : 2021-01-25 DOI:10.1177/2320206820987397
Bana Almashali, N. Alqahtani, A. Almahdy
{"title":"The Effect of Peri-Bracket Excess Adhesive on Shear Bond Strength and Enamel–Adhesive Interface Morphology With Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy: An In Vitro Comparative Study","authors":"Bana Almashali, N. Alqahtani, A. Almahdy","doi":"10.1177/2320206820987397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the effect of leaving excess adhesive around orthodontic brackets on the shear bond strength and on the enamel–adhesive interface characteristics. Materials and Methods: One hundred forty four human premolars were randomly divided into two groups according to the test performed. For the shear bond strength, 120 teeth were bonded with stainless steel orthodontic brackets using Transbond XT light cure adhesive composites. After positioning the bracket and before light curing, excess adhesive was removed according to the test group: group 1, all excess adhesive was removed (0 mm excess); group 2, 1 mm excess adhesive was left; group 3, 2 mm excess adhesive was left; shear bond strength was measured immediately and after three months of natural aging using a universal testing machine; and adhesive remnant index scores were also evaluated. For the enamel–adhesive interface characteristics, 24 teeth were bonded with stainless steel orthodontic brackets using Transbond XT light cure adhesive composites mixed with Rhodamine B fluorescent dye, excess adhesive was removed in the same manner according to the test groups, and teeth were evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Results: Time did not significantly affect the bond strength results (P = .888) but the amount of excess adhesive significantly affected the results (P < .05). Interaction terms were not significant (P = .337). In both immediate and aged conditions, group 1 (0 mm excess) presented the highest bond strength results (MPa; P < .05). No significant difference was found in adhesive remnant index scores or enamel–adhesive interface characteristics. Conclusion: Excess adhesive around orthodontic bracket does not increase shear bond strength.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2320206820987397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of leaving excess adhesive around orthodontic brackets on the shear bond strength and on the enamel–adhesive interface characteristics. Materials and Methods: One hundred forty four human premolars were randomly divided into two groups according to the test performed. For the shear bond strength, 120 teeth were bonded with stainless steel orthodontic brackets using Transbond XT light cure adhesive composites. After positioning the bracket and before light curing, excess adhesive was removed according to the test group: group 1, all excess adhesive was removed (0 mm excess); group 2, 1 mm excess adhesive was left; group 3, 2 mm excess adhesive was left; shear bond strength was measured immediately and after three months of natural aging using a universal testing machine; and adhesive remnant index scores were also evaluated. For the enamel–adhesive interface characteristics, 24 teeth were bonded with stainless steel orthodontic brackets using Transbond XT light cure adhesive composites mixed with Rhodamine B fluorescent dye, excess adhesive was removed in the same manner according to the test groups, and teeth were evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Results: Time did not significantly affect the bond strength results (P = .888) but the amount of excess adhesive significantly affected the results (P < .05). Interaction terms were not significant (P = .337). In both immediate and aged conditions, group 1 (0 mm excess) presented the highest bond strength results (MPa; P < .05). No significant difference was found in adhesive remnant index scores or enamel–adhesive interface characteristics. Conclusion: Excess adhesive around orthodontic bracket does not increase shear bond strength.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在共聚焦激光扫描显微镜下,支架周围过量胶粘剂对剪切结合强度和牙釉质-胶粘剂界面形态的影响:体外比较研究
目的:探讨矫治托槽周围残留过量粘接剂对牙釉质-粘接剂界面特性及剪切强度的影响。材料与方法:144颗人前磨牙按试验情况随机分为两组。采用Transbond XT光固化复合材料将120颗牙与不锈钢正畸托槽进行剪切粘接。支架定位后,光固化前,按试验组进行多余的胶粘剂去除:1组,所有多余的胶粘剂去除(多余0 mm);第2组,剩余黏合剂1 mm;第三组,剩余胶粘剂2mm;用万能试验机立即和自然老化三个月后测定剪切粘结强度;并对粘着残余指数进行评分。针对牙釉质-粘接剂界面特征,采用混合罗丹明B荧光染料的Transbond XT光固化复合粘接剂将24颗牙与不锈钢正畸托槽粘接,按试验组按相同方式去除多余的粘接剂,用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜对牙齿进行评价。结果:时间对粘接强度无显著影响(P = 0.888),但过量粘接量对粘接强度有显著影响(P < 0.05)。相互作用项不显著(P = .337)。在即时和老化条件下,1组(过量0 mm)的粘结强度结果最高(MPa;P < 0.05)。黏著剂残留指数评分及釉质-黏著剂界面特征无显著差异。结论:矫治托槽周围过量的粘接剂不能增加剪切粘接强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Microbiological and Immunological Assessment of Peri-implant Sites in Healthy and Diabetic Individuals After Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Prospective Case Control Study Translucency and Color Difference of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations: The Effect of Surface Finishing on Background Color Effects of Fluoride Varnish on Roughness of Polyacid-Modified Composite Resins at Different Temperatures: An In Vitro Study Synthesis and Characterization of Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles Based on Hemidesmus Indicus Extract: Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Bioactivity for Prosthetic Implant Coatings Comparative Evaluation of Penetrability of Various Bioceramic Sealers into the Tubules of Radicular Dentin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1