Managerial philosophy of Chinese CEOs in modern business: A cross-cultural study

Y.-F.L. Lee
{"title":"Managerial philosophy of Chinese CEOs in modern business: A cross-cultural study","authors":"Y.-F.L. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.tekhne.2013.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Contrasting between the Hofstede cultural dimensions and the philosophical constituents of Confucianism, this study discloses the idiosyncrasy and incongruence of the leadership and stakeholder management of Chinese corporate executive officers (CEOs) across mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. As supported by the dialogs from 54 pan-Chinese corporate leaders, such peculiarity is perceptible thanks to the practical variation in respective local culture in that mainland Chinese CEOs are more autocratic and power-lopsided, emphasizing Confucian loyalty and ritual/propriety; Hong Kongese CEOs are hierarchical but flexible, accentuating Confucian loyalty and integrity, and the leaders of Taiwan are alternatively modest and less patriarchal, avowing the importance of Confucian integrity, righteousness, and humaneness. For business practitioners around the world, a fundamental but thorough understanding of such cross-cultural managerial dissimilarity is crucial not only to enrich one's inter-personal and inter-corporate experience, but also to prosper mutual corporate relationships and business capacity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101212,"journal":{"name":"Tékhne","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 54-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tekhne.2013.09.001","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tékhne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1645991113000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Contrasting between the Hofstede cultural dimensions and the philosophical constituents of Confucianism, this study discloses the idiosyncrasy and incongruence of the leadership and stakeholder management of Chinese corporate executive officers (CEOs) across mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. As supported by the dialogs from 54 pan-Chinese corporate leaders, such peculiarity is perceptible thanks to the practical variation in respective local culture in that mainland Chinese CEOs are more autocratic and power-lopsided, emphasizing Confucian loyalty and ritual/propriety; Hong Kongese CEOs are hierarchical but flexible, accentuating Confucian loyalty and integrity, and the leaders of Taiwan are alternatively modest and less patriarchal, avowing the importance of Confucian integrity, righteousness, and humaneness. For business practitioners around the world, a fundamental but thorough understanding of such cross-cultural managerial dissimilarity is crucial not only to enrich one's inter-personal and inter-corporate experience, but also to prosper mutual corporate relationships and business capacity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代企业中中国ceo的管理哲学:跨文化研究
通过对比Hofstede文化维度和儒家哲学成分,本研究揭示了中国大陆、香港和台湾地区的中国企业高管在领导力和利益相关者管理方面的特质和不一致性。从54位泛中国企业领导人的对话中可以看出,由于各自地方文化的实际差异,这种独特性是可以感知的,因为中国大陆的首席执行官更专制和权力不平衡,强调儒家的忠诚和礼仪;香港的首席执行官等级森严,但灵活,强调儒家的忠诚和正直;台湾的领导人谦逊,不那么家长式,强调儒家的正直、正义和人性的重要性。对于世界各地的商业从业者来说,对这种跨文化管理差异的基本而透彻的理解是至关重要的,不仅可以丰富个人和企业间的经验,还可以促进相互之间的企业关系和业务能力的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Networks, Exchange Rate Fluctuation, and Economic Growth: ARDL Approach A Content Analysis on the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the United States of America Entrepreneurship and Income Inequality: A Dynamic Spatial Panel Data Analysis Ethics, Legal and Privacy Concerns for the Next Generation of Insurance Policies Brand management and internationalization: A case study in the sports equipment industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1