Peer review in research assessment and data analysis of Italian publications in SSD M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography, library science)

IF 0.2 Q2 Arts and Humanities JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.36253/jlis.it-510
Rossana Morriello
{"title":"Peer review in research assessment and data analysis of Italian publications in SSD M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography, library science)","authors":"Rossana Morriello","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nSince the introduction of research assessment systems at institutional level in the 1980s, the ongoing debate on the roles and functions of peer review and bibliometrics has been vivid and lively. In the first part of the article, the main lines over time of this debate are traced, and a reflection on the epistemic functions of peer review and citations is proposed. In Italy, the first research assessment exercise (VTR) was based on peer review only, while the following ones (VQR) were based on different methods for bibliometric disciplines and non-bibliometric disciplines, namely bibliometric indicators and peer review. Starting from a data analysis on Italian publications, and using as a sample data from M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography and library science) area, the essay shows some trends and changes in publication habits in HSS. Conclusions open a perspective on revitalization of peer review as a solid qualitative method for research assessment.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"122 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JLIS.it","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the introduction of research assessment systems at institutional level in the 1980s, the ongoing debate on the roles and functions of peer review and bibliometrics has been vivid and lively. In the first part of the article, the main lines over time of this debate are traced, and a reflection on the epistemic functions of peer review and citations is proposed. In Italy, the first research assessment exercise (VTR) was based on peer review only, while the following ones (VQR) were based on different methods for bibliometric disciplines and non-bibliometric disciplines, namely bibliometric indicators and peer review. Starting from a data analysis on Italian publications, and using as a sample data from M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography and library science) area, the essay shows some trends and changes in publication habits in HSS. Conclusions open a perspective on revitalization of peer review as a solid qualitative method for research assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SSD M-STO/08(档案学、目录学、图书馆学)意大利出版物研究评估与数据分析的同行评议
自20世纪80年代在机构层面引入研究评估制度以来,关于同行评议和文献计量学的作用和功能的争论一直是生动活泼的。在文章的第一部分,追踪了这场争论的主线,并对同行评议和引文的认知功能提出了反思。在意大利,第一次研究评价工作(VTR)仅基于同行评议,而随后的研究评价工作(VQR)基于文献计量学科和非文献计量学科的不同方法,即文献计量指标和同行评议。本文从对意大利出版物的数据分析出发,以M-STO/08(档案学、目标学和图书馆学)领域的样本数据为例,展示了HSS出版习惯的一些趋势和变化。结论为重振同行评议作为一种可靠的研究评价定性方法开辟了前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JLIS.it
JLIS.it INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JLIS.it is an academic journal of international scope, peer-reviewed and open access, aiming to valorise international research in Library and Information Science. Contributions in LIS, Library and Information Science, are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Librarianship as Civic Engagement Hachette v. Internet Archive On the edge of knowledge Alberto Petrucciani. Un amico, un collega, un Maestro Document as a multifaceted knowledge object
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1