Recent Advances in Color and Whiteness Evaluations in Dentistry

M. M. Pérez, O. Pecho, R. Ghinea, R. Pulgar, A. D. Bona
{"title":"Recent Advances in Color and Whiteness Evaluations in Dentistry","authors":"M. M. Pérez, O. Pecho, R. Ghinea, R. Pulgar, A. D. Bona","doi":"10.2174/2542579x01666180719125137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n The final goal of color measurement or shade specification in dentistry is\nthe reproduction by prosthetic materials of all important appearance characteristics of natural oral\nstructures. The application of color science in dentistry is an objective way to measure and evaluate\nsuch structures and dental materials in clinical practice and dental research.\n\n\n Literature on color science was reviewed to present new metrics to evaluate color differences\nof dental materials and dental structures. Visual acceptability and perceptibility values of color\ndifferences are reviewed and new whiteness indexes to describe whiteness in dentistry are presented.\n\n\nIn the last decade, the CIELAB 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds were set\nto 1.2 and 2.7, respectively, and the CIEDE2000 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds\nwere set to 0.8 and 1.8. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula became increasingly popular in\ndentistry. Developments in color science have led to the description of tooth whiteness and changes\nin tooth whiteness based on whiteness indexes, with the most relevant being the WID whiteness index,\nwhich is a customized index based in CIELAB color space.\n\n\n\n The application of color science in dentistry has allowed the precise description of\ntooth color and whiteness. The revised and new CIEDE2000 color-difference formula is expected to\nfully replace the outdated CIELAB formula in almost all dental applications. Recent psychophysical\nstudies have reported values of visual thresholds and new whiteness indexes, which can serve as\nquality control tools to guide the selection of esthetic dental materials, evaluate clinical performance,\nand interpret visual and instrumental findings in clinical dentistry, dental research, and subsequent\nstandardization.","PeriodicalId":10853,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in dentistry","volume":"6 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579x01666180719125137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

The final goal of color measurement or shade specification in dentistry is the reproduction by prosthetic materials of all important appearance characteristics of natural oral structures. The application of color science in dentistry is an objective way to measure and evaluate such structures and dental materials in clinical practice and dental research. Literature on color science was reviewed to present new metrics to evaluate color differences of dental materials and dental structures. Visual acceptability and perceptibility values of color differences are reviewed and new whiteness indexes to describe whiteness in dentistry are presented. In the last decade, the CIELAB 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds were set to 1.2 and 2.7, respectively, and the CIEDE2000 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds were set to 0.8 and 1.8. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula became increasingly popular in dentistry. Developments in color science have led to the description of tooth whiteness and changes in tooth whiteness based on whiteness indexes, with the most relevant being the WID whiteness index, which is a customized index based in CIELAB color space. The application of color science in dentistry has allowed the precise description of tooth color and whiteness. The revised and new CIEDE2000 color-difference formula is expected to fully replace the outdated CIELAB formula in almost all dental applications. Recent psychophysical studies have reported values of visual thresholds and new whiteness indexes, which can serve as quality control tools to guide the selection of esthetic dental materials, evaluate clinical performance, and interpret visual and instrumental findings in clinical dentistry, dental research, and subsequent standardization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙科颜色和白度评价的最新进展
牙科中颜色测量或色度规范的最终目标是通过假体材料再现自然口腔结构的所有重要外观特征。色彩科学在牙科中的应用,是在临床实践和牙科研究中对这些结构和牙科材料进行测量和评价的一种客观方法。本文回顾了有关颜色科学的文献,提出了评估牙齿材料和牙齿结构颜色差异的新指标。综述了色差的视觉可接受性和可感知性值,并提出了描述牙医学中白度的新指标。在过去十年中,CIELAB 50:50%的可感知性和可接受性阈值分别被设置为1.2和2.7,CIEDE2000 50:50%的可感知性和可接受性阈值被设置为0.8和1.8。CIEDE2000色差配方越来越受行业欢迎。随着颜色科学的发展,基于白度指数来描述牙齿白度和牙齿白度的变化,其中最相关的是WID白度指数,这是一个基于CIELAB颜色空间的定制指数。颜色科学在牙科中的应用使牙齿颜色和白度的精确描述成为可能。修订后的新CIEDE2000色差配方有望在几乎所有牙科应用中完全取代过时的CIELAB配方。最近的心理物理学研究报道了视觉阈值和新的白度指数的值,它们可以作为质量控制工具来指导美观牙科材料的选择,评估临床性能,解释临床牙科、牙科研究和随后的标准化中的视觉和仪器结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teeth with Apical Periodontitis Obturated in the Presence or Absence of Cultivable Micro-Organisms: a Two-Year Prospective Study of Treatment Outcomes Determine the Applicability of Moyers Analysis in the Contemporary Western Australian Adolescent Population The Top 102 Most Cited Publications Relevant to Dental Education Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Dental Radiology Anterior Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness After Orthodontic Retraction Of Anterior Teeth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1