Pub Date : 2021-09-10DOI: 10.2174/2542579x03666210910164329
F. Chu, Xun Ding, T. Chow, L. Samaranayake
This prospective study aims to evaluate the one-year and two-year outcomes of root canals with apical periodontitis obturated in the presence or absence of cultivable micro-organisms, and define the influence on endodontic treatment outcome from different independent variables. 87 patients with 45 exposed and 43 unexposed canals who previously participated in a microbiological study of primary endodontic infections were invited back for review in 12 and 24 months after endodontic treatment. The review involves clinical examination, questionnaire interview and radiographic assessment in order to determine the treatment outcomes. The influence of independent variables, such as gender, age, tooth location, etc., on the treatment outcome, has also been analysed. A total of 85 teeth of 84 patients were reviewed one and two years after obturation. Chi-square test for trend showed that the one-year radiographic healing of apical lesions was significantly different between culture-positive and negative canals (P<0.05). However, there is no significant difference in the two-year radiographic healing between the two groups of canals (P>0.05). None of the independent variables was found to be significant in affecting the endodontic treatment outcome on logistic regression analysis. The presence of positive culture prior to obturation seemed to affect the healing of periapical tissues in a one-year review, but the effect appeared to be temporal and not affected the long-term outcome.
{"title":"Teeth with Apical Periodontitis Obturated in the Presence or Absence of Cultivable Micro-Organisms: a Two-Year Prospective Study of Treatment Outcomes","authors":"F. Chu, Xun Ding, T. Chow, L. Samaranayake","doi":"10.2174/2542579x03666210910164329","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579x03666210910164329","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000\u0000This prospective study aims to evaluate the one-year and two-year outcomes of root canals with apical periodontitis obturated in the presence or absence of cultivable micro-organisms, and define the influence on endodontic treatment outcome from different independent variables.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000 87 patients with 45 exposed and 43 unexposed canals who previously participated in a microbiological study of primary endodontic infections were invited back for review in 12 and 24 months after endodontic treatment. The review involves clinical examination, questionnaire interview and radiographic assessment in order to determine the treatment outcomes. The influence of independent variables, such as gender, age, tooth location, etc., on the treatment outcome, has also been analysed.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000A total of 85 teeth of 84 patients were reviewed one and two years after obturation. Chi-square test for trend showed that the one-year radiographic healing of apical lesions was significantly different between culture-positive and negative canals (P<0.05). However, there is no significant difference in the two-year radiographic healing between the two groups of canals (P>0.05). None of the independent variables was found to be significant in affecting the endodontic treatment outcome on logistic regression analysis.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000The presence of positive culture prior to obturation seemed to affect the healing of periapical tissues in a one-year review, but the effect appeared to be temporal and not affected the long-term outcome.\u0000","PeriodicalId":10853,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in dentistry","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82012817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-05DOI: 10.2174/2542579x03666210805100624
S. Abaid, S. Zafar, E. Kruger, M. Tennant
Moyers probability tables have been widely used to determine the mesiodistal dimensions of unerupted canines and premolars for mixed dentition space analysis. Secular, racial, and sexual dimorphism have been reported in the literature and applicability of Moyer analysis has been doubted in many other populations. The present study was conducted to determine the applicability of Moyers probability tables and develop a more accurate prediction method in a contemporary Western Australian adolescent population if needed. A retrospective study including 500 participants [323 females, 177 males] between 13-18 years old attending the orthodontic private practice was conducted. Mesiodistal dimensions of selected participants were obtained from pre-orthodontic treatment digital dental records using Invisalign® technology [ Invisalign®, Align Tech¬nology, Santa Clara, CA, USA] Data were analysed using SPSS. New regression equations were derived based on the sum of permanent mandibular incisors, and probability tables were proposed for more accurate prediction. Significant differences were found between the measured sum of permanent canine-premolar segments and those predicted with the Moyers probability table, at all percentile levels, except the 50th percentile, where no significant difference was observed. Moyers probability table can be applied at the 50th percentile for estimation of sum of mesiodistal dimensions of canine-premolars segments. Newly developed regression equations and tables could be considered to provide more accurate mixed dentition space analysis.
莫耶斯概率表被广泛用于确定未出牙和前磨牙的中远端尺寸,用于混合牙列空间分析。世俗的、种族的和性别的二态性在文献中有报道,Moyer分析的适用性在许多其他人群中受到质疑。本研究旨在确定莫耶斯概率表的适用性,并在必要时开发一种更准确的预测方法,适用于当代西澳大利亚青少年人群。回顾性研究纳入500名13-18岁在正畸私人诊所就诊的患者[女性323人,男性177人]。使用Invisalign®技术(Invisalign®,Align technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA)从正畸治疗前的数字牙科记录中获得所选参与者的中远端尺寸。以下颌恒切牙总数为基础,建立了新的回归方程,并建立了概率表进行预测。除了第50个百分位数外,在所有百分位数水平上,永久性犬-前磨牙节的测量总数与Moyers概率表预测的总数之间没有显著差异。Moyers概率表可以在第50百分位数处用于估计犬-前磨牙节段中-远端尺寸之和。新开发的回归方程和回归表可以提供更准确的混合牙列空间分析。
{"title":"Determine the Applicability of Moyers Analysis in the Contemporary Western Australian Adolescent Population","authors":"S. Abaid, S. Zafar, E. Kruger, M. Tennant","doi":"10.2174/2542579x03666210805100624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579x03666210805100624","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000\u0000 Moyers probability tables have been widely used to determine the mesiodistal dimensions of unerupted canines and premolars for mixed dentition space analysis. Secular, racial, and sexual dimorphism have been reported in the literature and applicability of Moyer analysis has been doubted in many other populations.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000The present study was conducted to determine the applicability of Moyers probability tables and develop a more accurate prediction method in a contemporary Western Australian adolescent population if needed.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000 A retrospective study including 500 participants [323 females, 177 males] between 13-18 years old attending the orthodontic private practice was conducted. Mesiodistal dimensions of selected participants were obtained from pre-orthodontic treatment digital dental records using Invisalign® technology [ Invisalign®, Align Tech¬nology, Santa Clara, CA, USA] Data were analysed using SPSS. New regression equations were derived based on the sum of permanent mandibular incisors, and probability tables were proposed for more accurate prediction. \u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000Significant differences were found between the measured sum of permanent canine-premolar segments and those predicted with the Moyers probability table, at all percentile levels, except the 50th percentile, where no significant difference was observed.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000Moyers probability table can be applied at the 50th percentile for estimation of sum of mesiodistal dimensions of canine-premolars segments. Newly developed regression equations and tables could be considered to provide more accurate mixed dentition space analysis.\u0000\u0000","PeriodicalId":10853,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in dentistry","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78583570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-28DOI: 10.2174/2542579x03666210728141256
Andy Wai Kan Yeung
None of the webpages fulfilled the recommendations from the National Institute of Health and the American Medical Association of being written below a seventh-grade level. More online patient education materials for dental radiology were recommended, and they should be written in a more easily understood way.
{"title":"Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Dental Radiology","authors":"Andy Wai Kan Yeung","doi":"10.2174/2542579x03666210728141256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579x03666210728141256","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000\u0000 None of the webpages fulfilled the recommendations from the National Institute of Health and the American Medical Association of being written below a seventh-grade level. More online patient education materials for dental radiology were recommended, and they should be written in a more easily understood way. \u0000\u0000","PeriodicalId":10853,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in dentistry","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90257066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-28DOI: 10.2174/2542579x03666210728130040
Andy Wai Kan Yeung, R. Tanaka, W. K. Leung
Growth and development in dental education globally depend on effective experience sharing and advocation of evidence-based practice, preferably tested via vigorous peer evaluation. This study aimed to evaluate the most cited dental education publications. The objectives were to identify the most productive entities, and the most frequently investigated themes and specialties. The top publications included 83 original articles, 15 reviews, 3 books, and 1 online document, written by 30 different authors, with 38 publications from dental journals not dedicated to education, and with an average of 5.5 citations per year. The most productive author was William Hendrickson. The most productive institutions were from Europe and the United States. There were 11 papers focused on operative dentistry, 9 on endodontology, 4 on special care dentistry, 2 on community dentistry, 2 on periodontology, and 2 on implantology. Within the top 102 list, 21 publications focused on the stress experienced by dental students at school. A multiple ANCOVA indicates that citation counts in these highly cited publications are associated with a number of authors and document types, such as “reviews/books/online document” compared with original articles (p < 0.001). Influential dental education studies were published on a variety of platforms. Over the past 20 years, the field witnessed the emergence of highly cited reports/articles. Similar to influential papers in various fields, the number of authors per top-cited dental education publications appeared to be associated with high citations indicating top quality and high appreciation/acceptance of the articles involved.
{"title":"The Top 102 Most Cited Publications Relevant to Dental Education","authors":"Andy Wai Kan Yeung, R. Tanaka, W. K. Leung","doi":"10.2174/2542579x03666210728130040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579x03666210728130040","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000\u0000 Growth and development in dental education globally depend on effective experience sharing and advocation of evidence-based practice, preferably tested via vigorous peer evaluation. \u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000 This study aimed to evaluate the most cited dental education publications. The objectives were to identify the most productive entities, and the most frequently investigated themes and specialties.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000The top publications included 83 original articles, 15 reviews, 3 books, and 1 online document, written by 30 different authors, with 38 publications from dental journals not dedicated to education, and with an average of 5.5 citations per year. The most productive author was William Hendrickson. The most productive institutions were from Europe and the United States. There were 11 papers focused on operative dentistry, 9 on endodontology, 4 on special care dentistry, 2 on community dentistry, 2 on periodontology, and 2 on implantology. Within the top 102 list, 21 publications focused on the stress experienced by dental students at school. A multiple ANCOVA indicates that citation counts in these highly cited publications are associated with a number of authors and document types, such as “reviews/books/online document” compared with original articles (p < 0.001). \u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000 Influential dental education studies were published on a variety of platforms. Over the past 20 years, the field witnessed the emergence of highly cited reports/articles. Similar to influential papers in various fields, the number of authors per top-cited dental education publications appeared to be associated with high citations indicating top quality and high appreciation/acceptance of the articles involved.\u0000\u0000","PeriodicalId":10853,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in dentistry","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78853454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-16DOI: 10.2174/2542579x03666210616150715
H. Lubis, A. Rachmawati, Stephani Tanius
Correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion generally requires extraction of the premolars, followed by the retraction of the anterior teeth to reduce overjet. Morphometric evaluation of alveolar bone can be used to study the limitation of tooth movement to avoid adverse effects. The purpose of this study is to measure the changes in the bone thickness of the maxillary incisors in skeletal Class II malocclusion patients after retraction and determine the relationship between changes in bone thickness and the amount of retractions using lateral cephalometric radiographs. The design of this study was to determine the cross-sectional changes in bone thickness in linear directions after retraction and the relationship between changes in bone thickness and the amount of retraction. Bone thickness in the linear directions was measured using digital cephalometric radiographs. The measurement results from tracing 43 lateral cephalometric before and after anterior retraction treatment showed that there was a difference in alveolar bone thickness at the 9mm level from the CEJ in a linear direction on the anterior retraction of skeletal Class II malocclusion maxillary incisors (p <0.05), however, there was no difference in alveolar bone thickness at levels 3 and 6 mm from CEJ in the linear direction, and the angular direction (p> 0.05). Changes in alveolar bone thickness did not correlate with the amount of incisor retraction (p> 0.05). The results showed that the change in labial alveolar bone thickness was not significantly correlated to the amount of retraction.
{"title":"Anterior Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness After Orthodontic Retraction Of Anterior Teeth","authors":"H. Lubis, A. Rachmawati, Stephani Tanius","doi":"10.2174/2542579x03666210616150715","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579x03666210616150715","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000\u0000Correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion generally requires extraction of the premolars, followed by the retraction of the anterior teeth to reduce overjet. Morphometric evaluation of alveolar bone can be used to study the limitation of tooth movement to avoid adverse effects. The purpose of this study is to measure the changes in the bone thickness of the maxillary incisors in skeletal Class II malocclusion patients after retraction and determine the relationship between changes in bone thickness and the amount of retractions using lateral cephalometric radiographs.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000The design of this study was to determine the cross-sectional changes in bone thickness in linear directions after retraction and the relationship between changes in bone thickness and the amount of retraction. Bone thickness in the linear directions was measured using digital cephalometric radiographs.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000The measurement results from tracing 43 lateral cephalometric before and after anterior retraction treatment showed that there was a difference in alveolar bone thickness at the 9mm level from the CEJ in a linear direction on the anterior retraction of skeletal Class II malocclusion maxillary incisors (p <0.05), however, there was no difference in alveolar bone thickness at levels 3 and 6 mm from CEJ in the linear direction, and the angular direction (p> 0.05). Changes in alveolar bone thickness did not correlate with the amount of incisor retraction (p> 0.05).\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000The results showed that the change in labial alveolar bone thickness was not significantly correlated to the amount of retraction.\u0000","PeriodicalId":10853,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in dentistry","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77505622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}