NATO enlargement after the first round

IF 1.6 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Spectator Pub Date : 1999-04-01 DOI:10.1080/03932729908456865
F. Larrabee
{"title":"NATO enlargement after the first round","authors":"F. Larrabee","doi":"10.1080/03932729908456865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the Washington Summit in April, NATO will formally admit three new members: Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic. Together with the future enlargement of the European Union, the integration of these three countries into NATO will significantly diminish the prospect that Central Europe will again become a source of international tension and geopolitical rivalry. It will also resolve Germany’s historical security dilemma. Rather than being the most exposed edge of the Western security community, Germany will now be surrounded by a group of democratic, peaceful allies. However, the entry of Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic into NATO does not end the process of enlargement. At the Madrid Summit, the Alliance agreed to maintain an “open door” to new members. Several countries – Slovenia, Romania, and the Baltic states – were singled out as potential candidates, though no explicit guarantee of membership or timetable was given. This raises a number of new policy dilemmas for NATO. How should the enlargement issue be handled at the Washington Summit? If NATO does not issue invitations to any new members at the Washington Summit, how can the credibility of its “open door” policy be maintained? Who should be invited to join in the second round and when should it take place? What will be the impact of any further enlargement on relations with Russia and Ukraine? What effect will further enlargement have on NATO’s cohesion and military effectiveness? Finally, and most importantly, how does enlargement contribute to NATO’s overall transformation and new missions? This question needs to be addressed","PeriodicalId":46246,"journal":{"name":"International Spectator","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Spectator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729908456865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

At the Washington Summit in April, NATO will formally admit three new members: Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic. Together with the future enlargement of the European Union, the integration of these three countries into NATO will significantly diminish the prospect that Central Europe will again become a source of international tension and geopolitical rivalry. It will also resolve Germany’s historical security dilemma. Rather than being the most exposed edge of the Western security community, Germany will now be surrounded by a group of democratic, peaceful allies. However, the entry of Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic into NATO does not end the process of enlargement. At the Madrid Summit, the Alliance agreed to maintain an “open door” to new members. Several countries – Slovenia, Romania, and the Baltic states – were singled out as potential candidates, though no explicit guarantee of membership or timetable was given. This raises a number of new policy dilemmas for NATO. How should the enlargement issue be handled at the Washington Summit? If NATO does not issue invitations to any new members at the Washington Summit, how can the credibility of its “open door” policy be maintained? Who should be invited to join in the second round and when should it take place? What will be the impact of any further enlargement on relations with Russia and Ukraine? What effect will further enlargement have on NATO’s cohesion and military effectiveness? Finally, and most importantly, how does enlargement contribute to NATO’s overall transformation and new missions? This question needs to be addressed
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一轮北约东扩之后
在4月的华盛顿峰会上,北约将正式接纳三个新成员:匈牙利、波兰和捷克共和国。再加上欧洲联盟未来的扩大,这三个国家加入北约将大大减少中欧再次成为国际紧张局势和地缘政治竞争根源的可能性。它还将解决德国的历史安全困境。德国不再是西方安全共同体中最暴露的边缘,而是将被一群民主、和平的盟友包围。然而,匈牙利、波兰和捷克共和国加入北约并没有结束北约东扩的进程。在马德里首脑会议上,联盟同意对新成员保持“敞开大门”。几个国家——斯洛文尼亚、罗马尼亚和波罗的海国家——被挑出来作为潜在的候选国,尽管没有明确保证加入欧盟,也没有给出时间表。这给北约带来了一系列新的政策困境。华盛顿峰会应如何处理扩员问题?如果北约在华盛顿峰会上不向任何新成员发出邀请,其“门户开放”政策的可信度如何维持?应该邀请谁参加第二轮,什么时候举行?欧盟进一步扩大将对与俄罗斯和乌克兰的关系产生什么影响?进一步的东扩将对北约的凝聚力和军事效能产生什么影响?最后,也是最重要的一点,东扩对北约的整体转型和新使命有何贡献?这个问题需要解决
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Spectator
International Spectator INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Weathering the Geopolitical Storms: The Ever-elusive Success of EU Policy towards Iran Opposing Nuclear Weapons Testing in the Global South: A Comparative Perspective Oops! … EU Did It Again! The EU’s Preference for Global Treaties vis-a-vis the Reality of WHO Politics The Falklands/Malvinas as an Identity Dispute: A Constructivist Analysis of the British and Argentinian Positions Kuwait as a Mediator in Regional Affairs: The Gulf Crises of 2014 and 2017
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1