Effectiveness of intravenous dexmedetomidine compared to intercostal nerve blocks in patients undergoing simple mastectomy with axillary dissection under general anaesthesia.

D. Kumar, S. Yeasmeen, Miraj Hossain, Montosh Kumar Mondal, A. F. Hoque, M. Islam, Ashfaqul Islam, Mohammad Mahabubuzzaman
{"title":"Effectiveness of intravenous dexmedetomidine compared to intercostal nerve blocks in patients undergoing simple mastectomy with axillary dissection under general anaesthesia.","authors":"D. Kumar, S. Yeasmeen, Miraj Hossain, Montosh Kumar Mondal, A. F. Hoque, M. Islam, Ashfaqul Islam, Mohammad Mahabubuzzaman","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v34i2.67748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: General anaesthesia is used for breast cancer surgery. The downside of generalanaesthesia includes inadequate pain control and a high incidence of nausea and vomiting. Generalanaesthesia with intravenous dexmedetomidine or intercostal nerve block reduce the incidence ofpostoperative pain.\nObjective: To evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous dexmedetomidine compared to intercostal nerveblocks in patients undergoing simple mastectomy with axillary dissection under general anaesthesia.Methods:It was a single-blinded prospective randomized comparative study. This study was conductedat the Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh MujibMedical University (BSMMU), Dhaka from March 2018 to March 2019. A total of 60 patients sufferingfrom breast cancer admitted in the Department of General Surgery of BSMMU Dhaka and scheduledfor simple mastectomy with axillary dissection, were enrolled in this study. Results: Age ,height andweight were almost identical between two groups. Duration of anaesthesia and surgery were almostsimilar between two groups. The mean heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure ,mean arterial pressure did not significantly fluctuate in subsequent baseline follow up and 15 minuteand at 160 minutes parameters were almost similar within two groups.Mean time to achieve adequateAldrete recovery score after extubation was almost similar between two groups. Postoperative sedationlevel was also similar between two groups. Majorty of the surgeon were satisfied about anaesthesiatechnique in both group A and group B. Mean time of rescue analgesic requirement in postoperativeperiod was satistically significant (p<0.05) between two group but it was clinically less significant(groupA= 112 minutes and groupB=141minutes.\nConclusion: Intravenous dexmedetomidine may be an alternative to intercostal nerve blocks inpatients undergoing simple mastectomy with axillary dissection under general anaesthesia as itprovided stable intraoperative haemodynamics, reduced blood loss and analgesic requirement, smoothrecovery, postoperative sedation level and surgeon satisfaction as well as intercostal nerve blocks.\nJBSA 2021; 34 (2) : 24-35","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v34i2.67748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General anaesthesia is used for breast cancer surgery. The downside of generalanaesthesia includes inadequate pain control and a high incidence of nausea and vomiting. Generalanaesthesia with intravenous dexmedetomidine or intercostal nerve block reduce the incidence ofpostoperative pain. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous dexmedetomidine compared to intercostal nerveblocks in patients undergoing simple mastectomy with axillary dissection under general anaesthesia.Methods:It was a single-blinded prospective randomized comparative study. This study was conductedat the Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh MujibMedical University (BSMMU), Dhaka from March 2018 to March 2019. A total of 60 patients sufferingfrom breast cancer admitted in the Department of General Surgery of BSMMU Dhaka and scheduledfor simple mastectomy with axillary dissection, were enrolled in this study. Results: Age ,height andweight were almost identical between two groups. Duration of anaesthesia and surgery were almostsimilar between two groups. The mean heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure ,mean arterial pressure did not significantly fluctuate in subsequent baseline follow up and 15 minuteand at 160 minutes parameters were almost similar within two groups.Mean time to achieve adequateAldrete recovery score after extubation was almost similar between two groups. Postoperative sedationlevel was also similar between two groups. Majorty of the surgeon were satisfied about anaesthesiatechnique in both group A and group B. Mean time of rescue analgesic requirement in postoperativeperiod was satistically significant (p<0.05) between two group but it was clinically less significant(groupA= 112 minutes and groupB=141minutes. Conclusion: Intravenous dexmedetomidine may be an alternative to intercostal nerve blocks inpatients undergoing simple mastectomy with axillary dissection under general anaesthesia as itprovided stable intraoperative haemodynamics, reduced blood loss and analgesic requirement, smoothrecovery, postoperative sedation level and surgeon satisfaction as well as intercostal nerve blocks. JBSA 2021; 34 (2) : 24-35
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉右美托咪定与肋间神经阻滞在全麻下单纯乳房切除术伴腋窝清扫患者中的疗效比较。
背景:全身麻醉用于乳腺癌手术。全麻的缺点包括疼痛控制不足和恶心和呕吐的高发。静脉右美托咪定全麻或肋间神经阻滞可减少术后疼痛的发生率。目的:评价右美托咪定静脉注射与肋间神经阻滞在全麻下单纯乳腺切除腋窝清扫术中的应用效果。方法:采用单盲、前瞻性、随机对照研究。本研究于2018年3月至2019年3月在达卡Bangabandhu Sheikh mujib医科大学(BSMMU)麻醉、镇痛和重症监护医学系进行。本研究选取60例在达卡BSMMU普外科接受单纯乳房切除术加腋窝清扫术的乳腺癌患者。结果:两组患者年龄、身高、体重基本一致。两组麻醉时间和手术时间基本相同。在随后的基线随访中,平均心率、收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压没有显著波动,15分钟和160分钟参数在两组内几乎相似。两组拔管后达到足够aldrete恢复评分的平均时间几乎相似。两组术后镇静水平相似。A组和b组对麻醉技术满意者均占多数。两组术后抢救镇痛所需平均时间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),临床差异有统计学意义(A组= 112 min, b组=141min)。结论:静脉注射右美托咪定可作为全麻下单纯乳房切除腋窝清扫术患者肋间神经阻滞的替代方法,术中血流动力学稳定,出血量减少,镇痛需求减少,恢复平稳,术后镇静水平提高,外科医生满意度提高。JBSA 2021;34 (2): 24-35
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Premedication of Oral Clonidine 2mcg/kg and 4mcg/kg for Analgesic and Pressure Response During First Twenty-four Hours After Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Comparative Study Comparison between effects of Clonazepam and Dexmedetomidine as sedative in elective Caesarean section under Subarachnoid anaesthesia A Dose Response Study Of Oral clonidine as premedication in patients undergoing abdominal gynaecological surgery Blood Glucose Variability as a Predictor of Mortality for Septic Patients in Intensive Care Unit Postoperative pain relief in pediatric surgery patients: Effect of intravenous paracetamol in comparison with diclofenac suppository
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1