Correlation of room acoustic parameters and noise level in eating establishments

IF 1 3区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ACOUSTICS Acta Acustica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1051/aacus/2023026
Lukáš Zelem, Vojtech Chmelík, C. Glorieux, M. Rychtáriková
{"title":"Correlation of room acoustic parameters and noise level in eating establishments","authors":"Lukáš Zelem, Vojtech Chmelík, C. Glorieux, M. Rychtáriková","doi":"10.1051/aacus/2023026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the impact of the occupancy level, the average acoustic absorption and the so-called acoustic capacity of a space, which is proportional with the volume and inversely proportional with the reverberation time, on the behavior of talking people in an eating establishments. Four different settings were compared: two casual dining restaurants, a self-service student canteen and a small faculty club. The Lombard effect was observed in all cases. In a restaurant with an average amount of absorbing surface of 2.4 m2 or more per person, the sound pressure level increased with more than 3 dB per doubling of the number of people. Results for the student canteen show that people started to communicate less when the number of people present was so high that the absorbing surface dropped under 1.5 m2/person (80 people). The level even stopped to increase with increasing occupancy from 150 people present and beyond, corresponding with 0.8 m2 of absorbing surface per person. This is roughly consistent with an estimated value for the acoustic capacity of that space, which was 189 people (corresponding with a table occupancy of about 72%). In the latter circumstances, the background noise level, as expressed by LA,95 was as high as 69 dB. Overcoming this level for oral communication would require a not sustainable vocal effort. In the tests performed in other restaurants, the observed occupancy was below 60%, which, thanks to the higher number of absorbing surfaces in those restaurants, was well below the acoustic capacity.","PeriodicalId":48486,"journal":{"name":"Acta Acustica","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Acustica","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2023026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses the impact of the occupancy level, the average acoustic absorption and the so-called acoustic capacity of a space, which is proportional with the volume and inversely proportional with the reverberation time, on the behavior of talking people in an eating establishments. Four different settings were compared: two casual dining restaurants, a self-service student canteen and a small faculty club. The Lombard effect was observed in all cases. In a restaurant with an average amount of absorbing surface of 2.4 m2 or more per person, the sound pressure level increased with more than 3 dB per doubling of the number of people. Results for the student canteen show that people started to communicate less when the number of people present was so high that the absorbing surface dropped under 1.5 m2/person (80 people). The level even stopped to increase with increasing occupancy from 150 people present and beyond, corresponding with 0.8 m2 of absorbing surface per person. This is roughly consistent with an estimated value for the acoustic capacity of that space, which was 189 people (corresponding with a table occupancy of about 72%). In the latter circumstances, the background noise level, as expressed by LA,95 was as high as 69 dB. Overcoming this level for oral communication would require a not sustainable vocal effort. In the tests performed in other restaurants, the observed occupancy was below 60%, which, thanks to the higher number of absorbing surfaces in those restaurants, was well below the acoustic capacity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
餐饮场所室内声学参数与噪声水平的相关性
本文讨论了用餐场所的占用水平、平均声吸收和所谓的空间声容量(与体积成正比,与混响时间成反比)对说话人行为的影响。四种不同的设置进行了比较:两个休闲餐厅,一个自助学生食堂和一个小型教师俱乐部。在所有情况下都观察到伦巴第效应。在人均平均吸声面积在2.4 m2以上的餐厅中,每增加一倍的人数,声压级就会增加3db以上。对学生食堂的研究结果表明,当人数过多时,人们的交流开始减少,以至于吸收面降至1.5平方米/人(80人)以下。随着入住人数从150人增加到超过150人,这一水平甚至停止了增长,相当于每人0.8平方米的吸收面积。这与该空间的声学容量估计值大致一致,该空间的声学容量为189人(对应的桌子占用率约为72%)。在后一种情况下,以LA 95表示的背景噪声级高达69 dB。要想在口头交流中达到这个水平,就需要在发声方面做出不可持续的努力。在其他餐馆进行的测试中,观察到的入住率低于60%,这要归功于这些餐馆的吸收面数量较多,远远低于声学容量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Acustica
Acta Acustica ACOUSTICS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Acustica, the Journal of the European Acoustics Association (EAA). After the publication of its Journal Acta Acustica from 1993 to 1995, the EAA published Acta Acustica united with Acustica from 1996 to 2019. From 2020, the EAA decided to publish a journal in full Open Access. See Article Processing charges. Acta Acustica reports on original scientific research in acoustics and on engineering applications. The journal considers review papers, scientific papers, technical and applied papers, short communications, letters to the editor. From time to time, special issues and review articles are also published. For book reviews or doctoral thesis abstracts, please contact the Editor in Chief.
期刊最新文献
Auralization based on multi-perspective ambisonic room impulse responses Amplitude-dependent modal coefficients accounting for localized nonlinear losses in a time-domain integration of woodwind model A direct-hybrid CFD/CAA method based on lattice Boltzmann and acoustic perturbation equations Acta Acustica: State of art and achievements after 3 years Impact of wearing a head-mounted display on localization accuracy of real sound sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1