Diálogo con el 'Manifiesto por una pedagogía post-crítica' desde la esperanza como acción social transformadora

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teoria de la Educacion Pub Date : 2020-05-13 DOI:10.14201/teri.22451
Marc Pallarès Piquer, María Lozano Estivalis
{"title":"Diálogo con el 'Manifiesto por una pedagogía post-crítica' desde la esperanza como acción social transformadora","authors":"Marc Pallarès Piquer, María Lozano Estivalis","doi":"10.14201/teri.22451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this article is the analysis of the Manifesto for a Post-critical Pedagogy, published by Hodgson, Vlieghe and Zamojski in 2017. This manifesto announces five principles that drive post-critical pedagogy towards a redefinition of the frameworks of the Education and training. We present agreements and disagreements regarding these five principles based on the following belief: it is necessary to overcome the reduction of education to a path of adaptation and/or social mobility, since the ultimate purpose of post-critical pedagogy should be to deepen. The development of the pedagogical subject. The result of the research allows us to advocate for a pedagogy that, subject to reality and to what things are, becomes «a meta-in-itself», enabled to analyze and relocate possible instrumentalizations. This leads us to demand a reformulation of the social and the political as a claim and revelation of certain existing distortions but also as an intersection that brings together the challenges of pedagogy. It is concluded that, based on a hermeneutic that goes beyond the contrast between understanding and explanation, hope can give us the opportunity to get certain opportunities and some social challenges to make utopias into commitments. And we do it because we conceive hope as an attitude that generates transformations and as an articulating aspiration for human actions, not as a chimeric resource that seeks to avoid the realization of the normative professional guidelines that pertain to pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":44731,"journal":{"name":"Teoria de la Educacion","volume":"86 1","pages":"65-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teoria de la Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.22451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The objective of this article is the analysis of the Manifesto for a Post-critical Pedagogy, published by Hodgson, Vlieghe and Zamojski in 2017. This manifesto announces five principles that drive post-critical pedagogy towards a redefinition of the frameworks of the Education and training. We present agreements and disagreements regarding these five principles based on the following belief: it is necessary to overcome the reduction of education to a path of adaptation and/or social mobility, since the ultimate purpose of post-critical pedagogy should be to deepen. The development of the pedagogical subject. The result of the research allows us to advocate for a pedagogy that, subject to reality and to what things are, becomes «a meta-in-itself», enabled to analyze and relocate possible instrumentalizations. This leads us to demand a reformulation of the social and the political as a claim and revelation of certain existing distortions but also as an intersection that brings together the challenges of pedagogy. It is concluded that, based on a hermeneutic that goes beyond the contrast between understanding and explanation, hope can give us the opportunity to get certain opportunities and some social challenges to make utopias into commitments. And we do it because we conceive hope as an attitude that generates transformations and as an articulating aspiration for human actions, not as a chimeric resource that seeks to avoid the realization of the normative professional guidelines that pertain to pedagogy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与“后批判教育学宣言”对话,希望是一种变革性的社会行动
本文的目的是分析霍奇森、弗利格和扎莫伊斯基于2017年出版的《后批判教育学宣言》。该宣言宣布了推动后批判教学法重新定义教育和培训框架的五项原则。我们基于以下信念提出了关于这五个原则的同意和分歧:有必要克服将教育减少到适应和/或社会流动的道路上,因为后批判教学法的最终目的应该是深化。教育学科的发展。这项研究的结果使我们能够倡导一种教学法,这种教学法服从于现实和事物的本来面目,成为“元本身”,能够分析和重新定位可能的工具化。这导致我们要求对社会和政治的重新表述,作为对某些现有扭曲的要求和启示,但也作为汇集教育学挑战的交叉点。本文的结论是,基于一种超越理解与解释之间的对比的解释学,希望可以给我们机会获得一定的机会和一些社会挑战,使乌托邦成为承诺。我们这样做是因为我们认为希望是一种产生转变的态度,是对人类行为的一种明确的渴望,而不是一种试图避免实现与教育学相关的规范性专业指导方针的混合资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teoria de la Educacion
Teoria de la Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria was founded in 1986. It is an international academic journal on Pedagogy that publishes original research articles, in open access, from a theoretical perspective and methodology of education, aiming at providing pedagogical knowledge to researchers and professionals to improve, through a discussion substantiated criticism, descriptions, explanations, understandings and applications of educational thought and action. The journal belongs to the Publication Services of the University of Salamanca. It is a biannual journal, publishing one issue per semester. The reception of articles is permanently open, welcoming original works in Spanish, English or Portuguese, admitting exceptionally proposals in other languages.
期刊最新文献
Populismo, legitimidad y educación financiada por el Estado Revisión sistemática sobre la evaluación de propuestas de gamificación en siete disciplinas educativas Identidad narrativa en la relación educativa: promesa, solicitud y don Análisis de una experiencia de prácticas cotidianas de democracia en educación infantil Prevención de la violencia y el acoso en la red en adolescentes: estrategias familiares de crecimiento personal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1