"EFFECTIVE" CITIZENSHIP IN THE EU STATES: AN INSTRUMENT OF TERRITORIAL AND POLITICAL (DE)CONSTRUCTION

«пе-© Узун
{"title":"\"EFFECTIVE\" CITIZENSHIP IN THE EU STATES: AN INSTRUMENT OF TERRITORIAL AND POLITICAL (DE)CONSTRUCTION","authors":"«пе-© Узун","doi":"10.18524/2707-5206.2022.35.261281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the transformation and modern conceptual problems of interpreting the essence of the institution of citizenship. The reasons and conditions for rethinking the concept of \"citizenship\" as the basic principle of relations between the state and a citizen from the state (national) \"belonging\" to \"legal connection\" are traced. Historical changes in the understanding of citizenship from Exclusive and Territorial Citizenship to Overlapping, Portable, Elective, Dual or Double, Multiple, and even – Strategic and Effective Citizenship. It is noted that a conceptual shift in understanding the legal relationship between a citizen and the state produces far-reaching implications for the processes of political and legal global integration, transnationalization, international migration, economic and national-territorial transformation, geopolitical (de)construction. It is shown that the modern use of the categories \"Strategic\" and \"Effective\" Citizenship \"demonstrates a new instrumental approach to the institution of citizenship, especially in the states of the European Union that have introduced supranational European citizenship and agreed on the development of subnational (regional) citizenship, as evidenced by the experience of the Aland Islands Finland. and a general course towards regionalization. The transformation of the institution takes place in the context of legitimizing a new political and legal order, solving the problem of democratic “inclusion”, political participation and its legal regulation in conditions of high migration and socio-economic mobility, and the orientation of the states of the European space towards macro-regional integration against the backdrop of growing needs for demographic labor force replacement. \n ","PeriodicalId":38327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2707-5206.2022.35.261281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the transformation and modern conceptual problems of interpreting the essence of the institution of citizenship. The reasons and conditions for rethinking the concept of "citizenship" as the basic principle of relations between the state and a citizen from the state (national) "belonging" to "legal connection" are traced. Historical changes in the understanding of citizenship from Exclusive and Territorial Citizenship to Overlapping, Portable, Elective, Dual or Double, Multiple, and even – Strategic and Effective Citizenship. It is noted that a conceptual shift in understanding the legal relationship between a citizen and the state produces far-reaching implications for the processes of political and legal global integration, transnationalization, international migration, economic and national-territorial transformation, geopolitical (de)construction. It is shown that the modern use of the categories "Strategic" and "Effective" Citizenship "demonstrates a new instrumental approach to the institution of citizenship, especially in the states of the European Union that have introduced supranational European citizenship and agreed on the development of subnational (regional) citizenship, as evidenced by the experience of the Aland Islands Finland. and a general course towards regionalization. The transformation of the institution takes place in the context of legitimizing a new political and legal order, solving the problem of democratic “inclusion”, political participation and its legal regulation in conditions of high migration and socio-economic mobility, and the orientation of the states of the European space towards macro-regional integration against the backdrop of growing needs for demographic labor force replacement.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟国家的“有效”公民身份:领土和政治建构的工具
本文分析了公民权制度本质解释的变迁和现代观念问题。从国家(民族)角度重新思考作为国家与公民关系基本原则的“公民权”概念的原因与条件“归属”与“法律关系”是有渊源的。公民权认识的历史变迁:从排他性、地域性公民权到重叠性、可移动性、可选择性、双重或双重、多重乃至战略性、有效性公民权。值得注意的是,理解公民与国家之间法律关系的概念转变对政治和法律全球一体化、跨国化、国际移民、经济和国家-领土转型、地缘政治(去)建设的过程产生了深远的影响。本文表明,“战略”和“有效”公民身份这两个类别的现代使用表明了公民身份制度的一种新的工具方法,特别是在引入超国家欧洲公民身份并同意发展次国家(地区)公民身份的欧盟国家,正如芬兰奥兰群岛的经验所证明的那样。以及走向区域化的总体进程。该制度的转型发生在使新的政治和法律秩序合法化的背景下,在高移民和社会经济流动性的条件下解决民主“包容”、政治参与及其法律规制的问题,以及在人口劳动力替代需求日益增长的背景下,欧洲空间各国朝着宏观区域一体化的方向发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies
International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Politikayı Yeniden Düşünmenin Bir İmkânı Olarak Jacques Rancière’de Politik Özneleşme Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarının Afet Yönetimindeki Rolü: 6 Şubat Depremi Hatay Örneği Türkiye İşçi Partisi’nin İnşa ve Gelişimini Tetikleyen Koşullar (1960 – 1966) Adil Düzen Kavramı Bağlamında Necmettin Erbakan’ın Dış Politika Anlayışı Alimcan Ablet, Çin-İsrail İlişkileri, İstanbul: İyidüşün Yayınları, (Mayıs 2021), ss. 208.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1