A. Hegde, Shashwat Agrawal, B. S. Rao, P. Mane, Chethan B. Shetty, Vikrant Khanna, Samarth Thakkar, P. Divakar, Ankita Nigam
{"title":"Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft for Primary Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament","authors":"A. Hegde, Shashwat Agrawal, B. S. Rao, P. Mane, Chethan B. Shetty, Vikrant Khanna, Samarth Thakkar, P. Divakar, Ankita Nigam","doi":"10.32098/mltj.02.2023.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. Peroneus longus tendon graft is not a popular first choice for ACL reconstruction. However, newer literature has shown good outcomes with its use. This study compares functional outcome and donor site morbidity of peroneus longus with hamstring tendon autograft to assess if it can be considered as one of the first choices for ACLR. Methods. This prospective cohort study involves 54 patients who underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACLR. 27 patients each were operated on with hamstring and peroneus longus autografts. At 2 years follow-up, functional outcome was compared between groups using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Modified Cincinnati, and Tegner-Lysholm scores. Donor site morbidity in the peroneus longus group was assessed using Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores. Results. At 2 years follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean IKDC (77.26 vs 80.78), Modified Cincinnati (84.41 vs 89.07), and Tegner-Ly-sholm scores (85.19 vs 88.78) between the hamstring and peroneus groups respectively. Mean FADI and AOFAS scores at 2 years follow up were 96.11 and 91.67 respectively in the peroneus group suggesting no significant donor site morbidity as compared to preoperative scores. Conclusions. Peroneus longus performs similar to hamstring grafts and can be considered as one of the first choices for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":46318,"journal":{"name":"MLTJ-Muscles Ligaments and Tendons Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MLTJ-Muscles Ligaments and Tendons Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32098/mltj.02.2023.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose. Peroneus longus tendon graft is not a popular first choice for ACL reconstruction. However, newer literature has shown good outcomes with its use. This study compares functional outcome and donor site morbidity of peroneus longus with hamstring tendon autograft to assess if it can be considered as one of the first choices for ACLR. Methods. This prospective cohort study involves 54 patients who underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACLR. 27 patients each were operated on with hamstring and peroneus longus autografts. At 2 years follow-up, functional outcome was compared between groups using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Modified Cincinnati, and Tegner-Lysholm scores. Donor site morbidity in the peroneus longus group was assessed using Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores. Results. At 2 years follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean IKDC (77.26 vs 80.78), Modified Cincinnati (84.41 vs 89.07), and Tegner-Ly-sholm scores (85.19 vs 88.78) between the hamstring and peroneus groups respectively. Mean FADI and AOFAS scores at 2 years follow up were 96.11 and 91.67 respectively in the peroneus group suggesting no significant donor site morbidity as compared to preoperative scores. Conclusions. Peroneus longus performs similar to hamstring grafts and can be considered as one of the first choices for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.
目的。腓骨长肌腱移植并不是前交叉韧带重建的首选。然而,较新的文献显示其使用效果良好。本研究比较了腓骨长肌与腘绳肌腱自体移植的功能结果和供体部位的发病率,以评估其是否可以作为ACLR的首选之一。方法。这项前瞻性队列研究包括54例接受关节镜单束ACLR的患者。27例患者均行自体腘绳肌和腓骨长肌移植。在2年的随访中,使用国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)、改良辛辛那提评分和Tegner-Lysholm评分比较各组的功能结局。采用足踝残疾指数(FADI)和美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)评分对腓骨长肌组供体部位的发病率进行评估。结果。随访2年,腘绳肌组和腓骨肌组的平均IKDC (77.26 vs 80.78)、改良辛辛那提评分(84.41 vs 89.07)和Tegner-Ly-sholm评分(85.19 vs 88.78)差异均无统计学意义。腓骨肌组2年随访FADI和AOFAS平均评分分别为96.11和91.67,提示与术前评分相比,供区无明显发病率。结论。腓骨长肌的功能与腘绳肌移植物相似,可以被认为是关节镜下前交叉韧带重建的首选之一。
期刊介绍:
MLTJ (Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal) is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal, ligament, tendon, public health, exercise physiology and kinesiology issues. Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal (MLTJ) provides the platform for exchange of new clinical and scientific information in the most precise and expeditious way to achieve timely dissemination of information and cross-fertilization of ideas. It is the official journal of the Italian Society of Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons (I.S.Mu.L.T.), Società Italiana Terapia con Onde D’urto (S.I.T.O.D.) and Società Italiana Studio Piede e Caviglia (S.I.S.P.E.C)