Social Distance from Mental Illness Among Counseling, Social Work, and Psychology Students and Helping Professionals

D. Tillman, D. Hof, A. Pranckevičienė, A. Endriulaitienė, R. Markšaitytė, K. Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė
{"title":"Social Distance from Mental Illness Among Counseling, Social Work, and Psychology Students and Helping Professionals","authors":"D. Tillman, D. Hof, A. Pranckevičienė, A. Endriulaitienė, R. Markšaitytė, K. Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė","doi":"10.33043/JSACP.10.1.24-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Negative stereotypes of people with mental illness may lead to stigma of those with mental illness, impacting their self-confidence and willingness to seek mental health treatment. Few studies have looked at the health professional’s role and the impact they may have on the stigmatization process of people with mental illness. The purpose of this article was to better understand the concept of social distance among individuals in the helping professions of counseling, social work, and psychology. A total of 305 students and 95 professionals from counseling, social work and psychology participated in this study. Results revealed that counseling, social work, and psychology students, and helping professionals do not differ in their need for social distance from people with mental illness. Helping professionals reported significantly more social distance from people with mental health problems in close personal relationships, compared to their social relationships. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in social distance observed as a function of professional experience.","PeriodicalId":37436,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33043/JSACP.10.1.24-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Negative stereotypes of people with mental illness may lead to stigma of those with mental illness, impacting their self-confidence and willingness to seek mental health treatment. Few studies have looked at the health professional’s role and the impact they may have on the stigmatization process of people with mental illness. The purpose of this article was to better understand the concept of social distance among individuals in the helping professions of counseling, social work, and psychology. A total of 305 students and 95 professionals from counseling, social work and psychology participated in this study. Results revealed that counseling, social work, and psychology students, and helping professionals do not differ in their need for social distance from people with mental illness. Helping professionals reported significantly more social distance from people with mental health problems in close personal relationships, compared to their social relationships. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in social distance observed as a function of professional experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理咨询、社会工作和心理专业学生与心理疾病的社会距离
对精神疾病患者的负面刻板印象可能导致对精神疾病患者的污名化,影响他们的自信和寻求精神健康治疗的意愿。很少有研究关注卫生专业人员的角色以及他们对精神疾病患者的污名化过程可能产生的影响。这篇文章的目的是为了更好地理解在咨询、社会工作和心理学的帮助职业中个体的社会距离的概念。共有305名学生和95名心理咨询、社会工作和心理学专业人员参与了本研究。结果显示,心理咨询、社会工作、心理学专业的学生和帮助专业人员对社会距离的需求与精神疾病患者没有差异。据报告,与有社会关系的人相比,有亲密个人关系的心理健康问题的专业人士与他们的社会距离要远得多。综上所述,社会距离作为职业经验的函数没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology
Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology promotes deep reflection on community change and system transformation in which counselors, psychologists, and other human service professionals play a role. This open access journal aims to highlight ‘engaged scholarship’ and the very important social change work done by professionals and activists that would not normally find its way into publication. The journal attempts to break down the divide between theory and practice in one of the most critical areas of our work: social transformation toward social and ecological justice and peace. This journal features action oriented articles, meaning manuscripts that discuss actual work (e.g., advocacy, activism, research, policy formulation and implementation, training, legislation) that has been conducted by the submitting author(s) and not proposed work or simple conceptualizations of issues. JSACP features four unique sections: -Activism and Advocacy -Education and Training -Policy and Theory -Program Development and Evaluation
期刊最新文献
Description and Pilot Evaluation of a Dreamer Ally Training for Higher Education Staff and Faculty Visions of Health: The GirlPower Photovoice Project Supporting Crossover Students in an Urban School District: A Participatory Project The Counselors for Social Justice (CSJ) Code of Ethics A Call for Social Justice in the American Counseling Association (ACA)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1