Land Governance and Conflict Management in Tanzania: Institutional Capacity and Policy-Legal Framework Challenges

IF 0.6 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Rural and Community Development Pub Date : 2017-04-18 DOI:10.12691/AJRD-5-2-3
P. John, S. Kabote
{"title":"Land Governance and Conflict Management in Tanzania: Institutional Capacity and Policy-Legal Framework Challenges","authors":"P. John, S. Kabote","doi":"10.12691/AJRD-5-2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines land governance in the Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor in Rukwa and Katavi regions in Tanzania. The four districts involved include Sumbawanga, Kalambo, Nkasi and Mpanda. Land governance and the management of related conflicts were assessed in views of the roles of local government and the challenges posed by policy and legal frameworks. Using a sample size of 270 smallholder farmers, a household survey was used to collect quantitative data, while qualitative data were collected from 74 Focus Group Discussions’ participants. The results confirmed the ‘legal dualism’ that embraces colonial policy and laws on land issues at local level despite the land reforms that have had taken place in Tanzania. In addition, land conflict was a common phenomenon. The results also show that the efforts of local governments, and other stakeholders, to manage land conflicts were hampered by serious challenges. The challenges include incapacitation of the local government with regard to legal issues, lack of education and unawareness of the policies and legal framework on the part of the citizenry. These resulted into ineffective implementation of informal and formal arrangements governing land issues. Ineffective land governance, in turn, stem from inadequate capacity to resolve land conflicts. This justifies poor land governance. To that effect, concerted efforts are needed to correct the situation.","PeriodicalId":45379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural and Community Development","volume":"17 1","pages":"46-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural and Community Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/AJRD-5-2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This paper examines land governance in the Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor in Rukwa and Katavi regions in Tanzania. The four districts involved include Sumbawanga, Kalambo, Nkasi and Mpanda. Land governance and the management of related conflicts were assessed in views of the roles of local government and the challenges posed by policy and legal frameworks. Using a sample size of 270 smallholder farmers, a household survey was used to collect quantitative data, while qualitative data were collected from 74 Focus Group Discussions’ participants. The results confirmed the ‘legal dualism’ that embraces colonial policy and laws on land issues at local level despite the land reforms that have had taken place in Tanzania. In addition, land conflict was a common phenomenon. The results also show that the efforts of local governments, and other stakeholders, to manage land conflicts were hampered by serious challenges. The challenges include incapacitation of the local government with regard to legal issues, lack of education and unawareness of the policies and legal framework on the part of the citizenry. These resulted into ineffective implementation of informal and formal arrangements governing land issues. Ineffective land governance, in turn, stem from inadequate capacity to resolve land conflicts. This justifies poor land governance. To that effect, concerted efforts are needed to correct the situation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坦桑尼亚的土地治理和冲突管理:机构能力和政策-法律框架挑战
本文考察了坦桑尼亚Rukwa和Katavi地区南部农业增长走廊的土地治理。涉及的四个县包括松巴旺加、卡兰博、恩卡西和潘达。根据地方政府的作用以及政策和法律框架带来的挑战,评估了土地治理和相关冲突的管理。本研究以270名小农为样本,采用入户调查收集定量数据,同时从74名焦点小组讨论参与者中收集定性数据。调查结果证实了“法律二元论”,尽管坦桑尼亚已经进行了土地改革,但这种法律二元论在地方一级支持关于土地问题的殖民政策和法律。此外,土地冲突也是一种普遍现象。研究结果还表明,地方政府和其他利益相关者管理土地冲突的努力受到严重挑战的阻碍。挑战包括地方政府在法律问题上的无能,缺乏教育和对公民的政策和法律框架的不了解。这导致有关土地问题的非正式和正式安排没有得到有效执行。而无效的土地治理则源于解决土地冲突的能力不足。这证明了土地管理不善。为此,需要作出协调一致的努力来纠正这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community Development from the Lens of Social Capital: A Sociological Study of Rupa Rural Municipality of Kaski, Nepal Penyuluhan Standar Produksi Ayam Petelur Jantan pada Kelompok Ternak Nawawi Farm Pengembangan dan Pemanfaatan Desain Kemasan sebagai Media Promosi pada UKM Heavenine Capital Structure, Asset Structure and Profitability of Rural Women Micro Enterprises in Kerala Trend Analysis of Hydro-climatic Historical Data and Future Scenarios of Climate Extreme Indices over Mono River Basin in West Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1