Assessment of Stormwater Infiltration Basins Models Developed in Gaza Strip

{"title":"Assessment of Stormwater Infiltration Basins Models Developed in Gaza Strip","authors":"","doi":"10.33976/jert.9.2/2022/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stormwater remains the sole source of aquifer recharge in the Gaza strip, which should be utilized properly through artificial infiltration. The study objective is to investigate and analyze the infiltration efficiency of three large exiting infiltration basins in the Gaza strip (Alamal, Asadaqa, and Waqf) using different infiltration techniques. The technique applied in Ala-mal basin is the natural surface spreading of stormwater while Asadaqa basin used the surface spreading combined with graveled boreholes. Waqf basin used non-graveled boreholes (empty shafts cased with UPVC pipes). The infiltration rate and efficiency were recorded and estimated for each basin during the 2021-2022 wet season and compared to a past 2017-2018 wet season at a water depth of 1.70 m.\nThe study revealed that, the actual infiltration capacity of Waqf basin was estimated as 2,000 m3/day in the 2021-2022 wet season, twice that in the 2017-2018 wet season, with an infiltration efficiency of 57.47 %, that was attributed to the 18 drilled non-graveled boreholes, which enhanced the seepage of stormwater into the underlying soil. Asadaqa basin has the lowest infiltration efficiency of 3.90 % due to the continuous accumulation of thick and dense sediment layer on the basin floor, with nonchanged actual infiltration capacity (around 2,800 m3/day) between the two studied wet seasons. On the oth-er hand, Alamal basin infiltration efficiency was only 4.60 %, with actual infiltration capacity of 629 and 105.4 m3/day dur-ing the two wet seasons, respectively where some repair and upgrade works were performed at Alamal basin which enhanced the actual infiltration capacity but still far from the design infiltration capacity. For future studies, Waqf basin technique should be thoroughly studied and investigated as a novel artificial infiltration method, with deep study on the factors af-fecting the infiltration process.","PeriodicalId":14123,"journal":{"name":"International journal of engineering research and technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of engineering research and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33976/jert.9.2/2022/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Stormwater remains the sole source of aquifer recharge in the Gaza strip, which should be utilized properly through artificial infiltration. The study objective is to investigate and analyze the infiltration efficiency of three large exiting infiltration basins in the Gaza strip (Alamal, Asadaqa, and Waqf) using different infiltration techniques. The technique applied in Ala-mal basin is the natural surface spreading of stormwater while Asadaqa basin used the surface spreading combined with graveled boreholes. Waqf basin used non-graveled boreholes (empty shafts cased with UPVC pipes). The infiltration rate and efficiency were recorded and estimated for each basin during the 2021-2022 wet season and compared to a past 2017-2018 wet season at a water depth of 1.70 m. The study revealed that, the actual infiltration capacity of Waqf basin was estimated as 2,000 m3/day in the 2021-2022 wet season, twice that in the 2017-2018 wet season, with an infiltration efficiency of 57.47 %, that was attributed to the 18 drilled non-graveled boreholes, which enhanced the seepage of stormwater into the underlying soil. Asadaqa basin has the lowest infiltration efficiency of 3.90 % due to the continuous accumulation of thick and dense sediment layer on the basin floor, with nonchanged actual infiltration capacity (around 2,800 m3/day) between the two studied wet seasons. On the oth-er hand, Alamal basin infiltration efficiency was only 4.60 %, with actual infiltration capacity of 629 and 105.4 m3/day dur-ing the two wet seasons, respectively where some repair and upgrade works were performed at Alamal basin which enhanced the actual infiltration capacity but still far from the design infiltration capacity. For future studies, Waqf basin technique should be thoroughly studied and investigated as a novel artificial infiltration method, with deep study on the factors af-fecting the infiltration process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加沙地带开发的雨水入渗盆地模式的评估
雨水仍然是加沙地带含水层补给的唯一来源,应通过人工渗透加以适当利用。研究目的是利用不同的入渗技术,调查和分析加沙地带三个大型出口入渗盆地(Alamal, Asadaqa和Waqf)的入渗效率。Ala-mal盆地采用的是雨水自然地表扩散技术,Asadaqa盆地采用的是地表扩散与砾石钻孔相结合的技术。Waqf盆地采用非砾石钻孔(空井套有UPVC管)。记录和估计了2021-2022年雨季每个流域的入渗速率和效率,并与过去的2017-2018年雨季进行了比较,水深为1.70 m。研究表明,2021-2022年雨季,Waqf流域的实际入渗能力估计为2000 m3/d,是2017-2018年雨季的两倍,入渗效率为57.47%,这主要归因于18个非砾石钻孔,这些钻孔增强了雨水对下垫土的渗透。Asadaqa盆地的入渗效率最低,为3.90%,这是由于盆地底部厚而密的沉积物层不断堆积造成的,两个湿季的实际入渗能力没有变化(约2800 m3/d)。而Alamal流域的入渗效率仅为4.60%,两个雨季的实际入渗能力分别为629 m3/d和105.4 m3/d,在此期间,Alamal流域进行了一些修复和升级工程,提高了实际入渗能力,但与设计入渗能力仍有较大差距。今后的研究应深入研究Waqf盆地技术作为一种新型人工入渗方法,深入研究影响入渗过程的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Equations for Rate of Energy Dissipation of a Stepped Spillway with Slope less than Critical and Specific Step Height Blockchain-Based Secure Smart Health IoT solution Using RBAC Architecture Fatigue life assessment of high-speed train’s bogie frame due to dynamic loads under the influence of wheel flat Luenberger Observer-Based Speed Sensor Fault Detection: real time implementation to DC Motors Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) - Applications Worldwide: A State-of-the-Art Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1