Land and justice from the indigenous perspective: a study on the Tayal philosophy of “sbalay”

Da-wei Kuan, G. Charlton
{"title":"Land and justice from the indigenous perspective: a study on the Tayal philosophy of “sbalay”","authors":"Da-wei Kuan, G. Charlton","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2020.1853917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Balay, kbalay, and sbalay are a series of related terms in the language of Tayal indigenous people in Taiwan. They connote Tayal people’s philosophy of reconciliation which is not only for resolving conflicts in the society but also embodied in the human–land relations. This article discusses the concept of justice in the sbalay philosophy that entrusts consensus and reconciliation with the truth. Examining the recent Pyanan Cypress Tree Incident sbalay case, this article analyzes the difference between Tayal people’s value system and Taiwanese state law and discusses some of the reasons behind the land conflicts between the state and indigenous peoples. This article suggests that it is necessary to provide legal space for Tayal people to practice the sbalay philosophy and human-land relations as part of the recognition of indigenous self-determination.","PeriodicalId":44432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2020.1853917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Balay, kbalay, and sbalay are a series of related terms in the language of Tayal indigenous people in Taiwan. They connote Tayal people’s philosophy of reconciliation which is not only for resolving conflicts in the society but also embodied in the human–land relations. This article discusses the concept of justice in the sbalay philosophy that entrusts consensus and reconciliation with the truth. Examining the recent Pyanan Cypress Tree Incident sbalay case, this article analyzes the difference between Tayal people’s value system and Taiwanese state law and discusses some of the reasons behind the land conflicts between the state and indigenous peoples. This article suggests that it is necessary to provide legal space for Tayal people to practice the sbalay philosophy and human-land relations as part of the recognition of indigenous self-determination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土着视角下的土地与正义:塔雅族“沙拉伊”哲学研究
Balay、kbalay、shbalay是台湾泰雅族语言中的一系列相关词汇。它们蕴含着塔雅尔人的和解哲学,不仅是为了解决社会冲突,而且体现在人地关系中。本文论述了夏莱哲学中的正义概念,即与真理的共识与和解。本文以最近发生的柏树事件为例,分析了塔雅人的价值体系与台湾国家法律的差异,并探讨了国家与原住民之间土地冲突的一些原因。本文认为,作为承认土著民族自决的一部分,有必要为塔亚尔人实践沙拉伊哲学和人地关系提供法律空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: As the pioneering journal in this field The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JLP) has a long history of publishing leading scholarship in the area of legal anthropology and legal pluralism and is the only international journal dedicated to the analysis of legal pluralism. It is a refereed scholarly journal with a genuinely global reach, publishing both empirical and theoretical contributions from a variety of disciplines, including (but not restricted to) Anthropology, Legal Studies, Development Studies and interdisciplinary studies. The JLP is devoted to scholarly writing and works that further current debates in the field of legal pluralism and to disseminating new and emerging findings from fieldwork. The Journal welcomes papers that make original contributions to understanding any aspect of legal pluralism and unofficial law, anywhere in the world, both in historic and contemporary contexts. We invite high-quality, original submissions that engage with this purpose.
期刊最新文献
Construing the transformed property paradigm of South Africa’s water law: new opportunities presented by legal pluralism? Wait, what are we fighting about? – Kelsen, Ehrlich and the reconciliation of normative jurisprudence and sociology of law Interview article: water movements’ defense of the right to water. From the European arena to the Dutch exception Scientific versus folk legal pluralism An exploration of legal pluralism, power and custom in South Africa. A conversation with Aninka Claassens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1