Characterisation of type 2 diabetes subgroups and their association with ethnicity and clinical outcomes: a UK real-world data study using the East London Database

R. Mathur, S. Hull, S. Hodgson, S. Finer
{"title":"Characterisation of type 2 diabetes subgroups and their association with ethnicity and clinical outcomes: a UK real-world data study using the East London Database","authors":"R. Mathur, S. Hull, S. Hodgson, S. Finer","doi":"10.1101/2021.08.26.21262657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Subgroups of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have been well characterised in experimental studies. However, it is unclear whether T2DM subgroups can be identified in UK based real-world populations and if they impact clinical outcomes. Aim: To derive T2DM subgroups using primary care data from a multi-ethnic population, evaluate associations with glycaemic control, treatment initiation and vascular outcomes, and understand how these vary by ethnicity. Design and setting: An observational cohort study in the East London Primary Care Database from 2008-2018. Method: Latent class analysis using age, sex, glycated haemoglobin, and body mass index at diagnosis was used to derive T2DM subgroups in White, South Asian, and Black groups. Time to treatment initiation and vascular outcomes was estimated using multivariable Cox-proportional hazards regression. Results: 31,931 adults with T2DM were included: 47% south Asian, 25% White, 20% Black. We replicated two previously described subgroups, \"Mild Age-Related Diabetes\" (MARD), \"Mild Obesity-related Diabetes\" (MOD), and characterised a third \"Severe Hyperglycaemic Diabetes\" (SHD). Compared to MARD, SHD had the poorest long term glycaemic control, fastest initiation of antidiabetic treatment (HR 2.02, 1.76-2.32), and highest risk of microvascular complications (HR 1.38, 1.28-1.49). MOD had the highest risk of macrovascular complications (HR 1.50, 1.23-1.83). Subgroup differences in treatment initiation were most pronounced for the White group, and vascular complications for the Black group. Conclusions: Clinically useful T2DM subgroups, identified at diagnosis, can be generated in routine real-world multi-ethnic populations, and may offer a pragmatic means to develop stratified primary care pathways and improve healthcare resource allocation.","PeriodicalId":22333,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of General Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"e421 - e429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.26.21262657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Subgroups of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have been well characterised in experimental studies. However, it is unclear whether T2DM subgroups can be identified in UK based real-world populations and if they impact clinical outcomes. Aim: To derive T2DM subgroups using primary care data from a multi-ethnic population, evaluate associations with glycaemic control, treatment initiation and vascular outcomes, and understand how these vary by ethnicity. Design and setting: An observational cohort study in the East London Primary Care Database from 2008-2018. Method: Latent class analysis using age, sex, glycated haemoglobin, and body mass index at diagnosis was used to derive T2DM subgroups in White, South Asian, and Black groups. Time to treatment initiation and vascular outcomes was estimated using multivariable Cox-proportional hazards regression. Results: 31,931 adults with T2DM were included: 47% south Asian, 25% White, 20% Black. We replicated two previously described subgroups, "Mild Age-Related Diabetes" (MARD), "Mild Obesity-related Diabetes" (MOD), and characterised a third "Severe Hyperglycaemic Diabetes" (SHD). Compared to MARD, SHD had the poorest long term glycaemic control, fastest initiation of antidiabetic treatment (HR 2.02, 1.76-2.32), and highest risk of microvascular complications (HR 1.38, 1.28-1.49). MOD had the highest risk of macrovascular complications (HR 1.50, 1.23-1.83). Subgroup differences in treatment initiation were most pronounced for the White group, and vascular complications for the Black group. Conclusions: Clinically useful T2DM subgroups, identified at diagnosis, can be generated in routine real-world multi-ethnic populations, and may offer a pragmatic means to develop stratified primary care pathways and improve healthcare resource allocation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病亚组的特征及其与种族和临床结果的关系:一项使用东伦敦数据库的英国真实世界数据研究
背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)的亚群在实验研究中已经得到了很好的表征。然而,目前尚不清楚T2DM亚组是否可以在英国的真实人群中确定,以及它们是否会影响临床结果。目的:利用来自多种族人群的初级保健数据得出T2DM亚组,评估与血糖控制、治疗开始和血管结局的关系,并了解这些因素如何因种族而异。设计和环境:2008-2018年东伦敦初级保健数据库中的观察性队列研究。方法:使用年龄、性别、糖化血红蛋白和诊断时的体重指数进行潜在分类分析,得出白人、南亚人和黑人组的T2DM亚群。使用多变量cox比例风险回归估计开始治疗的时间和血管预后。结果:31931例成人T2DM患者包括:47%南亚人,25%白人,20%黑人。我们重复了先前描述的两个亚组,“轻度年龄相关糖尿病”(MARD),“轻度肥胖相关糖尿病”(MOD),并描述了第三个“严重高血糖糖尿病”(SHD)。与MARD相比,SHD的长期血糖控制最差,抗糖尿病治疗开始最快(HR 2.02, 1.76-2.32),微血管并发症风险最高(HR 1.38, 1.28-1.49)。MOD的大血管并发症风险最高(HR 1.50, 1.23-1.83)。治疗开始的亚组差异在白人组最为明显,在黑人组血管并发症最为明显。结论:临床上有用的T2DM亚组,在诊断时确定,可以在现实世界的常规多民族人群中产生,并可能为发展分层初级保健途径和改善医疗资源分配提供实用手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: leading the fight in primary care Dealing with symptoms in the general population: lessons learned from the Danish Symptom Cohort Towards new definitions of avoidable hospital admissions Diagnosing myeloma in general practice: how might earlier diagnosis be achieved? General practice and the Medical Licensing Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1