Feature selection for stress level classification into a physiologycal signals set

Marco A. Jimenez-Limas, C. A. Ramirez-Fuentes, B. Tovar-Corona, Laura Ivoone Garay Jiménez
{"title":"Feature selection for stress level classification into a physiologycal signals set","authors":"Marco A. Jimenez-Limas, C. A. Ramirez-Fuentes, B. Tovar-Corona, Laura Ivoone Garay Jiménez","doi":"10.1109/ICEEE.2018.8533968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the methodology and results obtained when classifying two states of stress, low and high using a data base from Physionet that contains the recordings of physiological signals under several stress conditions. The signals were first denoised and then, features were extracted for segments of 5 minutes. Four out of 6 signals were chosen: heart rate variability, respiration, galvanic skin response from the hand, and galvanic skin response from the foot. Two non-lineal features were extracted: approximate entropy and correlation dimension, both with m=2 and m=3. Besides, three linear features were extracted: energy, mean and standard deviation. Five machine learning classifiers were compared: K-nearest neighbours, Support vector machines with a linear kernel, support vector machines with a Gaussian kernel, Naïve Bayes classifier, Random forest classifier and logistic regression. It was found that approximate entropy and correlation dimension with m=3 provide the greater differences between the two stress states. It was also found that choosing only three physiological signals and correlation dimension with m=3 the logistic regression classifier achieved and accuracy of 81.38%, the best performance compared to other combinations of signals and classifiers. The three physiological signals that provided the best features were heart rate variability, respiration and galvanic skin response on the foot.","PeriodicalId":6924,"journal":{"name":"2018 15th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE)","volume":"97 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 15th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEE.2018.8533968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper describes the methodology and results obtained when classifying two states of stress, low and high using a data base from Physionet that contains the recordings of physiological signals under several stress conditions. The signals were first denoised and then, features were extracted for segments of 5 minutes. Four out of 6 signals were chosen: heart rate variability, respiration, galvanic skin response from the hand, and galvanic skin response from the foot. Two non-lineal features were extracted: approximate entropy and correlation dimension, both with m=2 and m=3. Besides, three linear features were extracted: energy, mean and standard deviation. Five machine learning classifiers were compared: K-nearest neighbours, Support vector machines with a linear kernel, support vector machines with a Gaussian kernel, Naïve Bayes classifier, Random forest classifier and logistic regression. It was found that approximate entropy and correlation dimension with m=3 provide the greater differences between the two stress states. It was also found that choosing only three physiological signals and correlation dimension with m=3 the logistic regression classifier achieved and accuracy of 81.38%, the best performance compared to other combinations of signals and classifiers. The three physiological signals that provided the best features were heart rate variability, respiration and galvanic skin response on the foot.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特征选择将应力水平分类为生理信号集
本文描述了使用Physionet数据库(包含几种应激条件下的生理信号记录)对低和高两种应激状态进行分类的方法和结果。首先对信号去噪,然后对5分钟的片段进行特征提取。从6个信号中选择了4个:心率变异性、呼吸、手部皮肤电反应和足部皮肤电反应。提取两个非线性特征:近似熵和相关维数,均为m=2和m=3。此外,提取了三个线性特征:能量、均值和标准差。比较了五种机器学习分类器:k近邻、线性核支持向量机、高斯核支持向量机、Naïve贝叶斯分类器、随机森林分类器和逻辑回归。发现近似熵和m=3的相关维数提供了两种应力状态之间较大的差异。我们还发现,仅选择3个生理信号,且相关维数m=3时,逻辑回归分类器的准确率达到81.38%,是其他信号与分类器组合的最佳选择。提供最佳特征的三个生理信号是心率变异性、呼吸和足部皮肤电反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Performance Evaluation of Transmission Between Two Wireless Devices Based on Radio-over-Fiber Technology CCE 2018 Tutorial Validation of an EMG sensor for Internet of Things and Robotics Robust Control for Stabilization of Non-Inertial System: Pendulum-Acrobot Design of Log-Periodic Dipole Array Antenna with Implemmented Extra Dipole
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1