Prophylactic use of temporary uterine packing combined with topical tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing cesarean section: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial

A. A. Taha, N. Shady, H. Sallam, M. M. Ahmed
{"title":"Prophylactic use of temporary uterine packing combined with topical tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing cesarean section: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial","authors":"A. A. Taha, N. Shady, H. Sallam, M. M. Ahmed","doi":"10.21608/svuijm.2023.212595.1591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: since antiquity post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) has been a terrible event for obstetricians. It accounts for 34% of maternal deaths in Africa and developed countries. It complicates 6% of cesarean delivery (CD) and still raising and correlates with increased frequency of caesarean sections, many uterotonic agents have successfully used alone or in combinations for prevention of such catastrophic, but the most effective medication is still up for controversy. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of temporary uterine packing combined with topical tranexamic acid (TA) as adjunct for reducing blood loss following an elective cesarean delivery with intravenous tranexamic acid and placebo in women who have at least one risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage. Patients and methods: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial (: NCT03706339) conducted on 450 pregnant women at term (38 – 40 weeks) gestation scheduled for elective cesarean delivery, who were assigned to either intravenous TA, topical TA, or placebo(saline). The main outcome measures were blood loss at and 6 hours after cesarean delivery, the need for any additional oxytoxic drugs, and TA-related side effects. Results: There was a significant decrease in the intraoperative blood loss and total blood loss in both topical TA and IV TA groups compared to placebo group (p=0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001). Also, the need to extra uterotonics was significant decrease in IV TA group, 9 (6%) patients compared to 33 (22%) patients in placebo group, and 24 (16%) patients in topical TA group, (p=0.0001 and 0.006) respectively. Finally, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative hemoglobin, and post-operative complication showed no significant difference between the three groups (P= 0.276, 0.126, 0.853, 0.955, 1.00, 1.00) respectively. Conclusion: IV TA and temporary uterine packing combined with topical tranexamic acid is more effective than placebo in reducing total blood loss during and after cesarean delivery in women who have at least one risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage, but IV TA more effective.","PeriodicalId":34789,"journal":{"name":"SVU International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVU International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/svuijm.2023.212595.1591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: since antiquity post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) has been a terrible event for obstetricians. It accounts for 34% of maternal deaths in Africa and developed countries. It complicates 6% of cesarean delivery (CD) and still raising and correlates with increased frequency of caesarean sections, many uterotonic agents have successfully used alone or in combinations for prevention of such catastrophic, but the most effective medication is still up for controversy. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of temporary uterine packing combined with topical tranexamic acid (TA) as adjunct for reducing blood loss following an elective cesarean delivery with intravenous tranexamic acid and placebo in women who have at least one risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage. Patients and methods: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial (: NCT03706339) conducted on 450 pregnant women at term (38 – 40 weeks) gestation scheduled for elective cesarean delivery, who were assigned to either intravenous TA, topical TA, or placebo(saline). The main outcome measures were blood loss at and 6 hours after cesarean delivery, the need for any additional oxytoxic drugs, and TA-related side effects. Results: There was a significant decrease in the intraoperative blood loss and total blood loss in both topical TA and IV TA groups compared to placebo group (p=0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001). Also, the need to extra uterotonics was significant decrease in IV TA group, 9 (6%) patients compared to 33 (22%) patients in placebo group, and 24 (16%) patients in topical TA group, (p=0.0001 and 0.006) respectively. Finally, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative hemoglobin, and post-operative complication showed no significant difference between the three groups (P= 0.276, 0.126, 0.853, 0.955, 1.00, 1.00) respectively. Conclusion: IV TA and temporary uterine packing combined with topical tranexamic acid is more effective than placebo in reducing total blood loss during and after cesarean delivery in women who have at least one risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage, but IV TA more effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防性使用临时子宫填充物联合局部氨甲环酸减少剖宫产患者的失血和输血需求:一项双盲,随机对照试验
背景:自古以来,产后出血(PPH)一直是产科医生的可怕事件。它占非洲和发达国家孕产妇死亡人数的34%。它使6%的剖宫产(CD)复杂化,并且仍在上升,并与剖宫产的频率增加有关,许多子宫强张剂已经成功地单独使用或联合使用来预防这种灾难性的后果,但最有效的药物仍然存在争议。目的:比较临时子宫填塞联合外用氨甲环酸(TA)作为选择性剖宫产后静脉注射氨甲环酸和安慰剂减少出血量的疗效和安全性,用于至少有一种产后出血危险因素的妇女。患者和方法:一项双盲,随机临床试验(:NCT03706339),对450名计划择期剖宫产的妊娠期(38 - 40周)孕妇进行了随机临床试验,这些孕妇被分配为静脉TA,局部TA或安慰剂(生理盐水)。主要结局指标为剖宫产后6小时的出血量、是否需要额外的氧毒性药物以及ta相关的副作用。结果:与安慰剂组相比,局部TA组和静脉TA组术中出血量和总出血量均显著减少(p=0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001)。此外,静脉TA组需要额外子宫强张的患者显著减少,9例(6%)患者与安慰剂组33例(22%)患者和局部TA组24例(16%)患者相比,(p=0.0001和0.006)。三组手术时间、住院时间、术后血红蛋白、术后并发症差异均无统计学意义(P分别为0.276、0.126、0.853、0.955、1.00、1.00)。结论:对于存在至少一种产后出血危险因素的剖宫产患者,静脉注射TA和临时子宫填塞联合局部氨甲环酸在减少剖宫产术中和术后总出血量方面比安慰剂更有效,但静脉注射TA更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and risk factors for fatigue among health care providers in Qena University Hospitals: A hospital based study Intraoperative Color Doppler assessment of hepatic vasculature integrity: A Case Report Psychosocial impact of COVID-19 in rising generation: An observational study from India Application of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Pulmonology: Current Scenario and Future Prospective Functional Impairment and Quality of Life of patients with Major Depressive Disorder in Euthymia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1