Conventional and rapid diagnosis of fungal infections including mucormycosis linked to COVID-19

P. Punia, Savita Bhatiya, Aparna Parmar, D. Kumar
{"title":"Conventional and rapid diagnosis of fungal infections including mucormycosis linked to COVID-19","authors":"P. Punia, Savita Bhatiya, Aparna Parmar, D. Kumar","doi":"10.5455/ijmrcr.2023-04-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Introduction: COVID-19 is a primary respiratory viral illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2). It has been a challenge to diagnose COVID-19-associated mucormycosis as the clinical and radiological findings are nonspecific and could overlap. This study was done to estimate the incidence of various fungal infections during the COVID 19 pandemic and to evaluate the merits of conventional microbiological diagnostic approach. Method: All the nasal swabs and endoscopic biopsy samples received for fungal diagnosis from suspected mucormycosis COVID positive or COVID suspected patients were included in the study and were processed as per conventional microbiological techniques including direct KOH mount and culture growth on LPCB. Results: A total of 434 samples from suspected mucormycosis patients were received during the study period including 214 nasal swabs and nasal biopsies each, 1 sample each of nasal fluid, BAL and pus along with 3 sputum samples. The positivity rate in direct microscopy of swabs was 38.3%, and for tissue samples was 72.4%. Culture positivity rate was 47.6% amongst swabs with 19 Mucorales, 41 Aspergillus spp., 22 dematiaceious and 20 Candida spp. Culture positivity rate amongst biopsy samples was 40.6% with 35 for Mucorales, 36 for Aspergillus spp., 8 for dematiaceious and 8 for Candida spp. Conclusion: In our study, tissue samples had a greater culture positivity rate as compared to the nasal swabs, so they should be the preferred samples to be sent to the laboratory. However, nasal swabs performed better in culture growth, so their value need not be underestimated. In countries like India where RT-PCR not available in all clinical setups conventional techniques such as KOH wet mounts from samples and culture findings hold a promising outcome to start the antifungal therapy.","PeriodicalId":13694,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmrcr.2023-04-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: COVID-19 is a primary respiratory viral illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2). It has been a challenge to diagnose COVID-19-associated mucormycosis as the clinical and radiological findings are nonspecific and could overlap. This study was done to estimate the incidence of various fungal infections during the COVID 19 pandemic and to evaluate the merits of conventional microbiological diagnostic approach. Method: All the nasal swabs and endoscopic biopsy samples received for fungal diagnosis from suspected mucormycosis COVID positive or COVID suspected patients were included in the study and were processed as per conventional microbiological techniques including direct KOH mount and culture growth on LPCB. Results: A total of 434 samples from suspected mucormycosis patients were received during the study period including 214 nasal swabs and nasal biopsies each, 1 sample each of nasal fluid, BAL and pus along with 3 sputum samples. The positivity rate in direct microscopy of swabs was 38.3%, and for tissue samples was 72.4%. Culture positivity rate was 47.6% amongst swabs with 19 Mucorales, 41 Aspergillus spp., 22 dematiaceious and 20 Candida spp. Culture positivity rate amongst biopsy samples was 40.6% with 35 for Mucorales, 36 for Aspergillus spp., 8 for dematiaceious and 8 for Candida spp. Conclusion: In our study, tissue samples had a greater culture positivity rate as compared to the nasal swabs, so they should be the preferred samples to be sent to the laboratory. However, nasal swabs performed better in culture growth, so their value need not be underestimated. In countries like India where RT-PCR not available in all clinical setups conventional techniques such as KOH wet mounts from samples and culture findings hold a promising outcome to start the antifungal therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规和快速诊断真菌感染,包括与COVID-19相关的毛霉病
摘要:简介:COVID-19是由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV2)引起的原发性呼吸道病毒性疾病。诊断与covid -19相关的毛霉菌病一直是一项挑战,因为临床和放射学发现是非特异性的,并且可能重叠。本研究旨在估计2019冠状病毒病大流行期间各种真菌感染的发病率,并评估传统微生物学诊断方法的优点。方法:将疑似或疑似毛霉菌病患者的鼻拭子和内镜活检标本纳入研究,并按常规微生物学技术进行处理,包括直接安装KOH和在LPCB上培养生长。结果:研究期间共收集疑似毛霉菌病患者标本434份,其中鼻拭子和鼻活检各214份,鼻液、BAL、脓各1份,痰液3份。拭子直接镜检阳性率为38.3%,组织标本阳性率为72.4%。粘膜菌19种、曲霉菌41种、线虫22种、念珠菌20种,活检标本培养阳性率为40.6%,其中粘膜菌35种、曲霉菌36种、线虫8种、念珠菌8种。结论:本研究组织标本培养阳性率高于鼻拭子,应作为实验室首选标本。然而,鼻拭子在培养生长中表现更好,因此其价值不可低估。在像印度这样的国家,RT-PCR不能在所有的临床设置中使用,传统的技术,如KOH湿载样品和培养结果,有希望开始抗真菌治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Vaccine for HIV Medicinal Common Seed-Acorus Calamus A Rare Case of Placental Site Trophoblastic Tumor Post-Traumatic Feelings of Vulnerability, Psychological Disability, And Connection to Others in Victims of the 2016 Seka Train Derailment in Cameroon Multiple Polycystic Organs in A Middle Age Female: A Rare Case of More Than Ten Years Without Surgical Intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1