Why We Speak Up: The Effect of Preconceived Cause of Sexual Orientation on Heterosexual Engagement in the Homosexual Movement for Social Equality

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4243
Simran Goraya
{"title":"Why We Speak Up: The Effect of Preconceived Cause of Sexual Orientation on Heterosexual Engagement in the Homosexual Movement for Social Equality","authors":"Simran Goraya","doi":"10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the increasing societal acceptance of homosexual individuals, the perception of homosexuality by heterosexual individuals is polluted by personal bias. My study observed the interaction between 422 heterosexuals and the homosexual community. First, my subjects self reported their beliefs on the determinant of sexual orientation (genetic or lifestyle). Next, they took the Activism Orientation (AO) and Sexual Prejudice (SP) Scales as a baseline measure of their relationship with members homosexual community. Subjects were randomly assigned to listen to an interview of two fictional homosexual individuals that spoke of life experience which either supported or contradicted the subjects’ self reported beliefs. Additionally, subjects were assigned to a high or low empathy condition toward the interviewee. After listening to the interview, subjects were given the choice to allocate $0 - $8,000 in support of a pro - LGBT charity. Subjects then retook the AO and SP scales to measure for significant changes in perception of homsexuals after the fictional scenario. Results indicated a significant decrease in the AO of subjects that viewed interviews that contradicted their beliefs. Additionally, subjects assigned to the low empathy condition donated significantly larger amounts. The present study has two main implications: Heterosexual individuals’ generalize their advocacy toward the LGBT community based on the actions of a singular homosexual. Furthermore, many activists naturally approach issues regarding social justice from a place of empathy, it is more sustainable to approach social justice movements from a logical perspective to allow for more meaningful and long term participation in a social justice movement. \n","PeriodicalId":46753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the increasing societal acceptance of homosexual individuals, the perception of homosexuality by heterosexual individuals is polluted by personal bias. My study observed the interaction between 422 heterosexuals and the homosexual community. First, my subjects self reported their beliefs on the determinant of sexual orientation (genetic or lifestyle). Next, they took the Activism Orientation (AO) and Sexual Prejudice (SP) Scales as a baseline measure of their relationship with members homosexual community. Subjects were randomly assigned to listen to an interview of two fictional homosexual individuals that spoke of life experience which either supported or contradicted the subjects’ self reported beliefs. Additionally, subjects were assigned to a high or low empathy condition toward the interviewee. After listening to the interview, subjects were given the choice to allocate $0 - $8,000 in support of a pro - LGBT charity. Subjects then retook the AO and SP scales to measure for significant changes in perception of homsexuals after the fictional scenario. Results indicated a significant decrease in the AO of subjects that viewed interviews that contradicted their beliefs. Additionally, subjects assigned to the low empathy condition donated significantly larger amounts. The present study has two main implications: Heterosexual individuals’ generalize their advocacy toward the LGBT community based on the actions of a singular homosexual. Furthermore, many activists naturally approach issues regarding social justice from a place of empathy, it is more sustainable to approach social justice movements from a logical perspective to allow for more meaningful and long term participation in a social justice movement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们为什么大声疾呼:在争取社会平等的同性恋运动中,性取向的先入为主的原因对异性交往的影响
尽管社会对同性恋个体的接受程度越来越高,但异性恋个体对同性恋的看法却受到个人偏见的污染。我的研究观察了422名异性恋者和同性恋者之间的互动。首先,我的研究对象自我报告了他们对性取向决定因素的信念(基因或生活方式)。接下来,他们以行动主义取向(AO)和性偏见(SP)量表作为衡量他们与同性恋群体成员关系的基准。实验对象被随机分配听两个虚构的同性恋者的采访,他们讲述的生活经历要么支持,要么与实验对象自我报告的信念相矛盾。此外,受试者被分配到对受访者的高或低同理心条件。在听完访谈后,受试者被要求选择拨出0 - 8000美元来支持一个支持LGBT的慈善机构。然后,研究对象重新使用AO和SP量表来测量虚构场景后对同性恋认知的显著变化。结果表明,观看与他们的信念相矛盾的采访的受试者的AO显着下降。此外,被分配到低同理心条件下的受试者捐赠的金额明显更多。目前的研究有两个主要的含义:异性恋个体基于单一同性恋者的行为来推广他们对LGBT群体的支持。此外,许多积极分子自然地从同理心的角度来处理社会正义问题,从逻辑的角度来处理社会正义运动,以允许更有意义和长期参与社会正义运动,这是更可持续的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice
Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The vision of the Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice (JSARP) is to publish the most rigorous, relevant, and well-respected research and practice making a difference in student affairs practice. JSARP especially encourages manuscripts that are unconventional in nature and that engage in methodological and epistemological extensions that transcend the boundaries of traditional research inquiries.
期刊最新文献
How White Undergraduates Experience and Make Meaning of Parental Messages about Race The Overlooked Influence of Advising and Supporting Upon Leadership in Student Affairs Delivering on the Promise of High-Impact Practices: Research and Models for Achieving Equity, Fidelity, Impact, and Scale LGBTQ Leadership in Higher Education How Sorority and Fraternity Life Professionals Validate Culturally Based Sororities and Fraternities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1