{"title":"What will T levels change? The portrayal of technical and vocational education in England: tensions in policy, and a conundrum for lecturers","authors":"Louise Misselke","doi":"10.1080/13636820.2022.2118948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT United Kingdom (UK) government reform for technical and vocational education (TVET) is underway. A goal of which is to address a perceived status issue. Literature identifies an interpretation which perceives TVET as less challenging or for the less academically able. This thesis used practitioner-based enquiry to explore lecturer perceptions, contextualised by UK government’s TVET documentation analysis of the last 35 years. The research uncovered tensions in policy as a result of significant policy churn in TVET and presented a conundrum for those lecturers interviewed in terms of their professional identity and relationship with local employers. Constant policy change has bought issues of performativity and managerialism into the sector as it deals with the twists and turns of government. Causing lecturers interviewed to feel disconnection from their profession of origin resulting in a pervading sense of devaluing the vocational aspects of their sense of self. Together with the increased pressure to develop generic teaching skills, rather than specialist vocational pedagogy, it is argued, will only perpetuate the portrayal of TVET as lower status. The findings were bought together to argue that the constant policy churn has resulted in a lack of trust and legitimacy for TVET, offering one possible explanation for the portrayal and the status issue that new T-level qualifications are designed to address.","PeriodicalId":46718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vocational Education and Training","volume":"20 1","pages":"708 - 708"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2022.2118948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
ABSTRACT United Kingdom (UK) government reform for technical and vocational education (TVET) is underway. A goal of which is to address a perceived status issue. Literature identifies an interpretation which perceives TVET as less challenging or for the less academically able. This thesis used practitioner-based enquiry to explore lecturer perceptions, contextualised by UK government’s TVET documentation analysis of the last 35 years. The research uncovered tensions in policy as a result of significant policy churn in TVET and presented a conundrum for those lecturers interviewed in terms of their professional identity and relationship with local employers. Constant policy change has bought issues of performativity and managerialism into the sector as it deals with the twists and turns of government. Causing lecturers interviewed to feel disconnection from their profession of origin resulting in a pervading sense of devaluing the vocational aspects of their sense of self. Together with the increased pressure to develop generic teaching skills, rather than specialist vocational pedagogy, it is argued, will only perpetuate the portrayal of TVET as lower status. The findings were bought together to argue that the constant policy churn has resulted in a lack of trust and legitimacy for TVET, offering one possible explanation for the portrayal and the status issue that new T-level qualifications are designed to address.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vocational Education and Training is a peer-reviewed international journal which welcomes submissions involving a critical discussion of policy and practice, as well as contributions to conceptual and theoretical developments in the field. It includes articles based on empirical research and analysis (quantitative, qualitative and mixed method) and welcomes papers from a wide range of disciplinary and inter-disciplinary perspectives. The journal embraces the broad range of settings and ways in which vocational and professional learning takes place and, hence, is not restricted by institutional boundaries or structures in relation to national systems of education and training. It is interested in the study of curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment, as well as economic, cultural and political aspects related to the role of vocational and professional education and training in society. When submitting papers for consideration, the journal encourages authors to consider and engage with debates concerning issues relevant to the focus of their work that have been previously published in the journal. The journal hosts a biennial international conference to provide a forum for researchers to debate and gain feedback on their work, and to encourage comparative analysis and international collaboration. From the first issue of Volume 48, 1996, the journal changed its title from The Vocational Aspect of Education to Journal of Vocational Education and Training.