Comparative effectiveness of parent-child interaction therapy based on trauma exposure and attrition.

Erica P Messer, Emily A Eismann, Alonzo T Folger, Alex Grass, Julie Bemerer, Heather Bensman
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of parent-child interaction therapy based on trauma exposure and attrition.","authors":"Erica P Messer, Emily A Eismann, Alonzo T Folger, Alex Grass, Julie Bemerer, Heather Bensman","doi":"10.1037/tra0001259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is as effective at reducing behavior problems for children with a history of trauma and for those who do not complete therapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective chart review of patients between 2.5 and 6.5 years of age who participated in PCIT between January 1, 2012, and December 1, 2019, at a child advocacy center within a large Midwestern children's hospital was performed. Demographics, trauma history, and Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) and parenting confidence scores were collected. Changes in child behavior and parenting confidence over time were compared between patients with and without trauma exposure using separate generalized estimating equation models for those who did and did not complete PCIT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 212 PCIT participants, 116 (54.72%) had a trauma history and 96 (45.28%) did not, and 98 (46.23%) completed PCIT and 114 (53.77%) did not. Patient demographics were fairly diverse and representative of the region. Patients with trauma exposure were significantly less likely to complete PCIT (38.79%) than patients without trauma exposure (55.21%). ECBI intensity scores significantly decreased over time among both patients who did and did not complete PCIT. The change in ECBI intensity scores over time did not differ between patients with and without trauma exposure regardless of whether or not they completed PCIT. Parenting confidence significantly improved over time regardless of trauma exposure or attrition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standard PCIT can be used effectively with children with trauma exposure and results in significant improvement even for those who do not complete therapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":10674,"journal":{"name":"Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications","volume":"20 1","pages":"S97-S105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is as effective at reducing behavior problems for children with a history of trauma and for those who do not complete therapy.

Method: Retrospective chart review of patients between 2.5 and 6.5 years of age who participated in PCIT between January 1, 2012, and December 1, 2019, at a child advocacy center within a large Midwestern children's hospital was performed. Demographics, trauma history, and Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) and parenting confidence scores were collected. Changes in child behavior and parenting confidence over time were compared between patients with and without trauma exposure using separate generalized estimating equation models for those who did and did not complete PCIT.

Results: Of the 212 PCIT participants, 116 (54.72%) had a trauma history and 96 (45.28%) did not, and 98 (46.23%) completed PCIT and 114 (53.77%) did not. Patient demographics were fairly diverse and representative of the region. Patients with trauma exposure were significantly less likely to complete PCIT (38.79%) than patients without trauma exposure (55.21%). ECBI intensity scores significantly decreased over time among both patients who did and did not complete PCIT. The change in ECBI intensity scores over time did not differ between patients with and without trauma exposure regardless of whether or not they completed PCIT. Parenting confidence significantly improved over time regardless of trauma exposure or attrition.

Conclusions: Standard PCIT can be used effectively with children with trauma exposure and results in significant improvement even for those who do not complete therapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于创伤暴露和损耗的亲子互动疗法的有效性比较。
目的:确定亲子互动疗法(PCIT)是否能有效减少有创伤史的儿童和未完成治疗的儿童的行为问题:确定亲子互动疗法(PCIT)在减少有创伤史的儿童和未完成治疗的儿童的行为问题方面是否同样有效:方法:对2012年1月1日至2019年12月1日期间在美国中西部一家大型儿童医院内的儿童权益保护中心接受PCIT治疗的2.5至6.5岁患者进行回顾性病历审查。研究收集了人口统计学、创伤史、艾伯格儿童行为量表(ECBI)和养育信心评分。使用单独的广义估计方程模型,对完成和未完成 PCIT 的患者进行比较,比较有和没有创伤经历的患者在儿童行为和养育信心方面随时间的变化:在 212 名 PCIT 参与者中,116 人(54.72%)有心理创伤史,96 人(45.28%)没有;98 人(46.23%)完成了 PCIT,114 人(53.77%)没有。患者的人口统计学特征相当多样化,在该地区具有代表性。有外伤经历的患者完成 PCIT 的可能性(38.79%)明显低于无外伤经历的患者(55.21%)。随着时间的推移,完成和未完成 PCIT 的患者的 ECBI 强度评分均明显下降。无论是否完成 PCIT,有心理创伤暴露和没有心理创伤暴露的患者的 ECBI 强度得分随时间的推移没有差异。随着时间的推移,为人父母的信心有了明显的提高,无论是否有心理创伤:结论:标准PCIT可有效用于有创伤暴露的儿童,即使未完成治疗的儿童也能获得显著改善。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 months
期刊最新文献
Stress Accumulation, Depressive Symptoms, and Sleep Problems among Black Americans in the Rural South. Comparative effectiveness of parent-child interaction therapy based on trauma exposure and attrition. Orbital Exenteration: Tumour Diversity and Survival-Report from a Cancer Centre of Northeast India. Early-life respiratory tract infections and the risk of school-age lower lung function and asthma: a meta-analysis of 150 000 European children. [Study of an ocular ptosis in a 13th century illuminated manuscript].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1