An Artificial Intelligence Hypothetical Approach for Masseter Muscle Segmentation on Ultrasonography in Patients With Bruxism

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Oral Research Pub Date : 2021-04-04 DOI:10.1177/23202068211005611
K. Orhan, G. Yazici, M. Kolsuz, N. Kafa, I. Bayrakdar, Özer Çelik
{"title":"An Artificial Intelligence Hypothetical Approach for Masseter Muscle Segmentation on Ultrasonography in Patients With Bruxism","authors":"K. Orhan, G. Yazici, M. Kolsuz, N. Kafa, I. Bayrakdar, Özer Çelik","doi":"10.1177/23202068211005611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The present study is aimed to assess the segmentation success of an artificial intelligence (AI) system based on the deep convolutional neural network (D-CNN) method for the segmentation of masseter muscles on ultrasonography (USG) images. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was carried out by using the radiology archive of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology of the Faculty of Dentistry in Ankara University. A total of 195 anonymized USG images were used in this retrospective study. The deep learning process was performed using U-net, Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet), and Fuzzy Petri Net (FPN) architectures. Muscle thickness was assessed using USG by manual segmentation and measurements using USG’s software. The neural network model (CranioCatch, Eskisehir-Turkey) was then used to determine the muscles, following automatic measurements of the muscles. Accuracy, ROC area under the curve (AUC), and Precision-Recall Curves (PRC) AUC were calculated in the test dataset and compare a human observer and the AI model. Manual segmentation and measurements were compared statistically with AI (P < .05). The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze whether there is a statistically significant difference between the predicted values and the actual values. Results: The AI models detected and segmented all test muscle data for FPN and U-net, while only two cases of muscles were not detected by PSPNet (false negatives). Accuracies of FPN, PSPNet, and U-net were estimated as 0.985, 0.947, and 0.969, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic scores of FPN, PSPNet, and U-net were estimated as 0.977, 0.934, and 0.969, respectively. The D-CNN measurements of the muscles were similar to manual measurements. There was no significant difference between the two measurement methods in three groups (P > .05). Conclusion: The proposed AI system approach for the analysis of USG images seems to be promising for automatic masseter muscle segmentation and measurement of thickness. This method can help surgeons, radiologists, and other professionals such as physical therapists in evaluating the time correctly and saving time for diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068211005611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aim: The present study is aimed to assess the segmentation success of an artificial intelligence (AI) system based on the deep convolutional neural network (D-CNN) method for the segmentation of masseter muscles on ultrasonography (USG) images. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was carried out by using the radiology archive of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology of the Faculty of Dentistry in Ankara University. A total of 195 anonymized USG images were used in this retrospective study. The deep learning process was performed using U-net, Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet), and Fuzzy Petri Net (FPN) architectures. Muscle thickness was assessed using USG by manual segmentation and measurements using USG’s software. The neural network model (CranioCatch, Eskisehir-Turkey) was then used to determine the muscles, following automatic measurements of the muscles. Accuracy, ROC area under the curve (AUC), and Precision-Recall Curves (PRC) AUC were calculated in the test dataset and compare a human observer and the AI model. Manual segmentation and measurements were compared statistically with AI (P < .05). The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze whether there is a statistically significant difference between the predicted values and the actual values. Results: The AI models detected and segmented all test muscle data for FPN and U-net, while only two cases of muscles were not detected by PSPNet (false negatives). Accuracies of FPN, PSPNet, and U-net were estimated as 0.985, 0.947, and 0.969, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic scores of FPN, PSPNet, and U-net were estimated as 0.977, 0.934, and 0.969, respectively. The D-CNN measurements of the muscles were similar to manual measurements. There was no significant difference between the two measurement methods in three groups (P > .05). Conclusion: The proposed AI system approach for the analysis of USG images seems to be promising for automatic masseter muscle segmentation and measurement of thickness. This method can help surgeons, radiologists, and other professionals such as physical therapists in evaluating the time correctly and saving time for diagnosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磨牙患者咬肌超声分割的人工智能假设方法
目的:本研究旨在评估基于深度卷积神经网络(D-CNN)方法的人工智能(AI)系统在超声图像(USG)上对咬肌的分割效果。材料和方法:本回顾性研究利用安卡拉大学牙科学院口腔颌面放射学系的放射学档案进行。在这项回顾性研究中,共使用了195张匿名USG图像。深度学习过程使用U-net、金字塔场景解析网络(PSPNet)和模糊Petri网(FPN)架构进行。肌肉厚度采用USG进行人工分割和USG软件测量。神经网络模型(CranioCatch, Eskisehir-Turkey)随后被用来确定肌肉,随后是肌肉的自动测量。在测试数据集中计算准确率、曲线下ROC面积(AUC)和精确召回曲线(PRC) AUC,并将人类观察者和人工智能模型进行比较。人工分割和测量与人工智能比较有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。采用Mann-Whitney U检验分析预测值与实际值之间是否存在统计学显著性差异。结果:人工智能模型对FPN和U-net的所有测试肌肉数据进行了检测和分割,只有2例肌肉未被PSPNet检测到(假阴性)。FPN、PSPNet和U-net的准确率分别为0.985、0.947和0.969。FPN、PSPNet和U-net的受试者工作特征得分分别为0.977、0.934和0.969。D-CNN对肌肉的测量与人工测量相似。三组间两种测量方法比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:本文提出的USG图像分析的人工智能系统方法在咬肌自动分割和厚度测量方面很有前景。这种方法可以帮助外科医生、放射科医生和其他专业人士如物理治疗师正确评估时间,节省诊断时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Microbiological and Immunological Assessment of Peri-implant Sites in Healthy and Diabetic Individuals After Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Prospective Case Control Study Translucency and Color Difference of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations: The Effect of Surface Finishing on Background Color Effects of Fluoride Varnish on Roughness of Polyacid-Modified Composite Resins at Different Temperatures: An In Vitro Study Synthesis and Characterization of Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles Based on Hemidesmus Indicus Extract: Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Bioactivity for Prosthetic Implant Coatings Comparative Evaluation of Penetrability of Various Bioceramic Sealers into the Tubules of Radicular Dentin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1