Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Evaluating Improvement Networks

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Religion & Education Pub Date : 2021-01-12 DOI:10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0271
David G Sherer, Richard Paquin-Morel, Adrian Larbi-Cherif, J. Russell
{"title":"Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Evaluating Improvement Networks","authors":"David G Sherer, Richard Paquin-Morel, Adrian Larbi-Cherif, J. Russell","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educators and education-related organizations are increasingly joining and forming networks to improve learning opportunities and outcomes for students. The turn to networks reflects growing recognition in the education field that problems in education are too complex for any one educator or organization to solve on their own and that collaboration has the potential to accelerate improvement. While there is a history of networks in education to support informal sharing and collaboration, improvement networks are intentionally designed and structured to organize systematic inquiry that enables educators to learn how to better respond to a specific problem of practice. For example, Tony Bryk, Louis Gomez, and Alicia Grunow from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching introduced the concept of the “networked improvement community” to the educational field. These networks bring together communities of educators, reformers, researchers, and leaders, and they provide a structure for organizing inquiry into the root causes and potential solutions to high-leverage problems, such as inequities in student achievement and college access. This article explores the improvement network concept and ways to measure and evaluate these networks. It is organized into four sections, three of which are further divided into subsections. The first section explores how to conceptualize improvement networks. It makes a crucial distinction between the social organization and technical work of networks, and this distinction is preserved and highlighted in subsequent parts of the article. The second section explores approaches to evaluating improvement networks. This is followed by a section on measuring the technical and social organization of networks. The article concludes with a selected set of cases of improvement network evaluations.","PeriodicalId":43359,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Education","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educators and education-related organizations are increasingly joining and forming networks to improve learning opportunities and outcomes for students. The turn to networks reflects growing recognition in the education field that problems in education are too complex for any one educator or organization to solve on their own and that collaboration has the potential to accelerate improvement. While there is a history of networks in education to support informal sharing and collaboration, improvement networks are intentionally designed and structured to organize systematic inquiry that enables educators to learn how to better respond to a specific problem of practice. For example, Tony Bryk, Louis Gomez, and Alicia Grunow from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching introduced the concept of the “networked improvement community” to the educational field. These networks bring together communities of educators, reformers, researchers, and leaders, and they provide a structure for organizing inquiry into the root causes and potential solutions to high-leverage problems, such as inequities in student achievement and college access. This article explores the improvement network concept and ways to measure and evaluate these networks. It is organized into four sections, three of which are further divided into subsections. The first section explores how to conceptualize improvement networks. It makes a crucial distinction between the social organization and technical work of networks, and this distinction is preserved and highlighted in subsequent parts of the article. The second section explores approaches to evaluating improvement networks. This is followed by a section on measuring the technical and social organization of networks. The article concludes with a selected set of cases of improvement network evaluations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念化、测量和评估改进网络
教育工作者和教育相关组织越来越多地加入并形成网络,以改善学生的学习机会和成果。向网络的转变反映了教育领域越来越多的认识,即教育问题太复杂,任何一个教育者或组织都无法单独解决,而合作有可能加速改进。虽然网络在教育中有支持非正式共享和协作的历史,但改进网络是有意设计和构建的,以组织系统的探究,使教育者能够学习如何更好地应对具体的实践问题。例如,卡内基教学促进基金会的Tony Bryk、Louis Gomez和Alicia Grunow将“网络化改进社区”的概念引入了教育领域。这些网络将教育工作者、改革者、研究人员和领导人聚集在一起,并为组织调查学生成绩不平等和大学入学机会不平等等高杠杆问题的根本原因和潜在解决方案提供了一个结构。本文探讨了改进网络的概念以及对改进网络进行测量和评价的方法。它被组织成四个部分,其中三个部分进一步分为小节。第一部分探讨如何概念化改进网络。它在社会组织和网络的技术工作之间做出了关键的区分,这一区别将在本文的后续部分得到保留和强调。第二部分探讨评估改进网络的方法。接下来是关于度量网络的技术和社会组织的一节。文章最后选取了一组改进网络评价的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
50 Years of Religion & Education: The Origins of the Journal and the Interdisciplinary Study of Religion and Education Religion, Education, and the Future of Democratic Pluralism Review: Spirituality That Makes a Difference, by Charles R. Kniker, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022; ISBN: 978-1-6667-1789-1 “One More Thing”: Clarifying the Evidence Around Christian Privilege in Higher Education Catholic and Public Schools Compared: Examining Achievement Growth in an Urban Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1