Cognitive Function in Response to an Acute, High Intensity Exercise-Does Gender Plays a Role?

R. Pilz-Burstein, Hilla Klein-Grufi, Dina Yakobian, M. Arnon
{"title":"Cognitive Function in Response to an Acute, High Intensity Exercise-Does Gender Plays a Role?","authors":"R. Pilz-Burstein, Hilla Klein-Grufi, Dina Yakobian, M. Arnon","doi":"10.24018/ejsport.2023.2.2.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing evidence favoring the positive effect of exercise on cognition is mostly based on men participants (75%). We therefore exposed females and males to acute exercise and evaluated gender cognitive response to this intervention.\nThirty- two adults (M=17; F=15) ages 18-34 participated in the study. The exercise consisted of ten repetitions: 10 seconds sprints at maximal speed, followed by 50 seconds active recovery. Stroop test (ST) 1-3; Trail-making test (TMT) 1-2; Word fluency were evaluated prior to; immediately post exercise; and at 45’ recovery. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures (three test points X 2 gender groups) was used to test the effect of exercise on cognitive performance.\nAll participants reached close to maximal heart rates at the end of the 10th sprint round. Stroop 1- 2 results improved for both males and females from pre to post exercise (p<0.01). After 45’ males returned to pre-exercise while females retained high values. For Stroop 3 both genders improved from pre to post (p<0.01) and retained high values after 45’. For TMT-1 males showed no response while females’ results improved immediately and at 45’ post intervention (p<0.01). For TMT-2 both genders improved after exercise (p<0.01); however, only females continued improving at 45’ recovery. Word fluency was positively affected by exercise in males only.\nAcute bout of exercise has a positive immediate effect on cognitive performance both in males and females; whereas males returned to pre-intervention values at 45’ min recovery, females retained the positive effect of exercise also after 45 minutes.","PeriodicalId":36509,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsport.2023.2.2.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The growing evidence favoring the positive effect of exercise on cognition is mostly based on men participants (75%). We therefore exposed females and males to acute exercise and evaluated gender cognitive response to this intervention. Thirty- two adults (M=17; F=15) ages 18-34 participated in the study. The exercise consisted of ten repetitions: 10 seconds sprints at maximal speed, followed by 50 seconds active recovery. Stroop test (ST) 1-3; Trail-making test (TMT) 1-2; Word fluency were evaluated prior to; immediately post exercise; and at 45’ recovery. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures (three test points X 2 gender groups) was used to test the effect of exercise on cognitive performance. All participants reached close to maximal heart rates at the end of the 10th sprint round. Stroop 1- 2 results improved for both males and females from pre to post exercise (p<0.01). After 45’ males returned to pre-exercise while females retained high values. For Stroop 3 both genders improved from pre to post (p<0.01) and retained high values after 45’. For TMT-1 males showed no response while females’ results improved immediately and at 45’ post intervention (p<0.01). For TMT-2 both genders improved after exercise (p<0.01); however, only females continued improving at 45’ recovery. Word fluency was positively affected by exercise in males only. Acute bout of exercise has a positive immediate effect on cognitive performance both in males and females; whereas males returned to pre-intervention values at 45’ min recovery, females retained the positive effect of exercise also after 45 minutes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知功能对急性高强度运动的反应——性别起作用吗?
越来越多的证据支持运动对认知的积极影响,主要是基于男性参与者(75%)。因此,我们将女性和男性暴露于急性运动中,并评估了性别对这种干预的认知反应。32名成人(M=17;F=15)年龄在18-34岁的人参与了这项研究。这项运动包括10次重复:10秒以最大速度冲刺,然后是50秒主动恢复。Stroop测试(ST) 1-3;试车试验(TMT) 1-2;词汇流利度评估之前;运动后立即;在45 '恢复。采用重复测量的双因素方差分析(三个测试点X 2个性别组)来检验运动对认知表现的影响。在第10轮冲刺结束时,所有参与者的心率都接近最大心率。运动前后,男性和女性的Stroop 1- 2结果均有改善(p<0.01)。45分钟后,男性恢复到运动前,而女性则保持较高的数值。对于Stroop 3,两种性别在前后均有提高(p<0.01),并在45 '后保持较高值。对于TMT-1,男性没有反应,而女性在干预后即刻和45分钟的结果有所改善(p<0.01)。运动后男女TMT-2均改善(p<0.01);然而,只有女性在45岁恢复时继续改善。只有在男性中,锻炼对单词流利度有积极影响。急性运动对男性和女性的认知表现都有积极的立竿见影的影响;男性在45分钟后恢复到干预前的水平,而女性在45分钟后也保持了运动的积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Physiological Approach to Cardio-endurance Training: Indicators of Optimal Parasympathetic Input on Cardiovascular Regulation are Better Predictors of Running Performance of Distance Runners Impact of Coaches’ Transformational Leadership on Soccer Players’ Satisfaction in Selected Ethiopian Super and National League Football Clubs Major International Competition Funding and Money Laundering Risks Starting and Specialisation Ages of Elite Athletes across Olympic Sports: An International Cross-sectional Study Effect of Different Foam Rolling Sensitivities on the Amount of Change in Range of Motion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1