Functional pharmacology: the drug discovery bottleneck?

Michael J.A. Walker , Terrance Barrett , Leon J. Guppy
{"title":"Functional pharmacology: the drug discovery bottleneck?","authors":"Michael J.A. Walker ,&nbsp;Terrance Barrett ,&nbsp;Leon J. Guppy","doi":"10.1016/S1741-8372(04)02449-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is our contention that functional pharmacology, particularly <em>in vivo</em>, must play a greater role in drug discovery if the promises of reductionist techniques are to be brought to full fruition. Despite the advent of high-throughput screening, combinatorial chemistry and informatics, the number of new chemical entities (NCEs) coming on the market has fallen. While the advent of these methodologies makes it possible to move very quickly from molecular target to lead compound, the problem of demonstrating therapeutic utility remains. Has proof of concept (<em>in vivo</em>) become the bottleneck in drug discovery? This article focuses on this problem, and discusses what can be done about it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100382,"journal":{"name":"Drug Discovery Today: TARGETS","volume":"3 5","pages":"Pages 208-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1741-8372(04)02449-1","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Discovery Today: TARGETS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1741837204024491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

It is our contention that functional pharmacology, particularly in vivo, must play a greater role in drug discovery if the promises of reductionist techniques are to be brought to full fruition. Despite the advent of high-throughput screening, combinatorial chemistry and informatics, the number of new chemical entities (NCEs) coming on the market has fallen. While the advent of these methodologies makes it possible to move very quickly from molecular target to lead compound, the problem of demonstrating therapeutic utility remains. Has proof of concept (in vivo) become the bottleneck in drug discovery? This article focuses on this problem, and discusses what can be done about it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能药理学:药物发现瓶颈?
我们的观点是,功能药理学,特别是体内功能药理学,必须在药物发现中发挥更大的作用,如果还原论技术的前景要得到充分实现的话。尽管出现了高通量筛选,组合化学和信息学,但市场上的新化学实体(nce)的数量已经下降。虽然这些方法的出现使得从分子靶点到先导化合物的快速转移成为可能,但证明治疗效用的问题仍然存在。概念验证(在体内)已经成为药物发现的瓶颈了吗?本文主要关注这个问题,并讨论可以为此做些什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genetic link to drug-induced weight gain identified The recombinant protein array: use in target identification and validation Ethics and patents: are patents bad or just misunderstood? Biomedical marker molecules for cancer – current status and perspectives Pleiotropy: the BAFFling truth of the TNF superfamily
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1